Huh, I don't think it's too bad. I kinda like it. I actually didn't notice the eye until you guys pointed it out, but now that I see it I also wish it was a bit less prominent. Still, I think the artwork is kinda nice overall.
I don't love it, but I get it. I prefer the ART artwork as well.
Still can't wait to see the changes, I'm in the camp that is rooting for its success. While flawed in Boston, I really loved it, it pulled my heartstrings nearly the right direction all evening.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
It's not hideous but nor is it very evocative. I'd replace the London scape with one of the ship with all the boys and Peter half way up the mast lookking out for them. This one would work better if the show were "Finding London."
I love that y'all love the ART artwork. It's just Times New Roman font with a basic background and some twinkle? How is that better? At least the new one is trying to give it a "logo," which I admire.
UGLY. And laughable. And amateur. Did they let an intern design it?
Not sure how that artwork is supposed to inspire curiosity and capture the attention of prospective ticket buyers. This design inspires nothing but VOMIT.
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle