Oh look, another thinly-veiled homophobic/racist/misogynist/ (interchangeable) piece of crap from Page Six and its toadies.
What makes it homophobic/racist/misogynist (interchangeable)? It looks like any other gossip article about backstage bickering with a high-profile celebrity and spouse. If anything, it's an equal-opportunity hack piece.
I loved it when it first opened, with the exception of the choreography for the dancing hyenas that remind me more of episodes of Fame than anything else. But the rest of the show was a visual feast and much of the score still sounded fresh and new. I took my husband to see it for the first time in London about 3 years ago and the show is starting to feel a bit dated. The London cast was very hit-or-miss (to put it kindly) and while the design is still lovely in parts, the s
Not because of a performer's power, but in last year's famous Company revival, which everyone but me loved, the understudy for Bobbi was black so when she was on they just cut the entirety of Tick Tock (it was staged with a sudden influx of Bobbi lookalikes and so they only that many white women). I love diversifying casts and understudies but you have to ensure you can still do the show as intended, guys. It was pretty bad.
Did you make it to closing? Lots of fun social media on it.
I really wanted to, but it sold out early and tickets on Stubhub were going for over $300 each. I'd rather put that money towards a trip to see it on Broadway (already have plans to see it in London next year).
