What do citizens do if the USA becomes a 3rd world country?

[chicagodannyd]

If the USA does deteriorate into a one party system where the Supreme Court is "packed," our original constitution dismantled, freedom of speech gone like on Twitter, and the major media represents only the voices of the people in power, then, obviously, millions of Americans will need to seek a remedy as we will be living in a 3rd world county.

Option one:  Never vote again.  Just live out your life as best as you can in any 3rd world country.
2.  Relocate to another country and start over, maybe New Zealand - or some place where there are no huge inner cities afflicted with violence, ANTIFA like crime, other violent crime, and where the government  actually represents the people by one man, one legal vote. 
3.  Try to find a place in the USA, far removed from big corrupt inner cities, less population, with communities favorable to our original constitution, if that is possible.  Could Idaho or Alaska serve this need, or maybe Montana?  Don't know the details here.

But I do know that if the government becomes a corrupt one party system and the original constitution is dismantled, Houston we got problems for millions of Americans, especially veterans who risked their lives for the original constitution.
Veteran of the Viet Nam War 1968-1970

Many people are unaware that all soldiers literally take the oath to defend the constitution of America.  We did not defend court packing or dismantling the constitution or morphing it into a document that benefits only the people in power, or terminating the 1st  Amendment.

 

[Jordan Catalano]

Probably move into whatever run down trailer park you’re in.

[Kad]

chicagodannyd said: "Don't know the details here."

You sure don't.

[Huss417]

I thought your sell by date had passed!

[dramamama611]

We did not miss you or your ridiculous theories. Go away. None of that is happening, nor will it. (The irony is that it is YOUR cheeto-idol that tries to do most of what you suggest.)

[Sutton Ross]

Bye Danny/Donny

[Mr Roxy]

NYC and State are one party and are basically destroyed. .Parts of NYC are 3rd world now .

[BroadwayNYC2]

The only thing that is third world is both of your brains

[Sutton Ross]

Mr Roxy said: "NYC and State are one party and are basically destroyed. .Parts of NYC are 3rd world now ."

Yeah man, I was walking on 72nd street and Central Park West earlier and I was thinking to myself "God, this reminds me of the month I spent in Eritrea years ago!!".

Totally

 

[TheatreFan4]

>2.  Relocate to another country and start over, maybe New Zealand.

Lol, as if you'd ever survive in liberal NZ where their COVID response was literally "We're locking down for 6 weeks and you WILL sit your ass home."

[Islander_fan]

I just got a good laugh from someone who thinks that banning things on twitter, or any other social media platform, is a violation of the first amendment.

Twitter, facebook, instagram, hell, even here on BroadwayWorld are all places with rules. They all have every right to say that one can post on their site. But, they also have the right to say that if you violate their rules (Terms of Service) then they can kick you out. I have never seen anyone on here say, regarding a comment in a thread get deleted, and the initial poster complaining that it was a violation if their first amendment rights. 

[yankeefan7]

"I just got a good laugh from someone who thinks that banning things on twitter, or any other social media platform, is a violation of the first amendment. Twitter, facebook, instagram, hell, even here on BroadwayWorld are all places with rules. "

Fine, tell me what rule did Twitter and FB have that had them take down anybody who posted a link about the Hunter Biden labtop/email story of the NY Post. Did either one of these tech giants prove it was not Hunter Biden's labtop or emails in the NY Post stories? Let's say the story was BS, don't you think we should be allowed to determine that ourselves and not have Twitter or FB censor it. Will be interesting to see if these tech giants continue to be protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

Of course, they have rules but those usually include things like foul language and hate speech for example.

[MysteriousLady]

yankeefan7 said: ""I just got a good laugh from someone who thinks that banning things on twitter, or any other social media platform, is a violation of the first amendment. Twitter, facebook, instagram, hell, even here on BroadwayWorld are all places with rules. "

Fine, tell me what rule did Twitter and FB have that had them take down anybody who posted a link about the Hunter Biden labtop/email story of the NY Post. Did either one of these tech giants prove it was not Hunter Biden's labtop or emails in the NY Post stories? Let's say the story was BS, don't you think we should be allowed to determine that ourselves and not have Twitter or FB censor it. Will be interesting to see if these tech giants continue to be protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

Of course, they have rules but those usually include things like foul language and hate speech for example."

Nothing stopped anyone from determining for themselves the validity of the laptop story; the stories were published for those interested to read them. Facebook and Twitter have the right to change rules as they go. They irritate Left and Right all the time. Users who disagree are free to not use those platforms. 

 

[Lavieboheme3090]

3rd world?

Considering that 1st world was Defined as the United States and its allies, the United States will always be “1st world country.” Not that anyone has seriously used the terms 1st or 3rd world in past 25 years.

[Kad]

Aw, remember Hunter Biden’s laptop?

[Sutton Ross]

Nah, just his laBtop.

[FindingNamo]

It was a lie the reporter didn't want his name on because it was a lie and he didn't want to be the reporter who followed orders from the Rupert Murdock managers to repeat the lie because the lie is there to make idiots (no offense) like you come across like idiots.

[CarlosAlberto]

FindingNamo said: "It was a lie the reporter didn't want his name on because it was a lie and he didn't want to be the reporter who followed orders from the Rupert Murdock managers to repeat the lie because the lie is there to make idiots (no offense) like you come across like idiots."

Huh? Wha...?!? I'm confusified...

 

[FindingNamo]

And that was me trying to keep it simple.