MOTOWN is a huge,sell-able brand name. People know it, know exactly what to expect and will pay for it.
Or at least they think they do. In my years selling records I had all kinds of people who wanted "Motown CDS" that had great Motown songs like "When a Man Loves a Woman" and "R-E-S-P-E-C-T" and, of course, neither of those songs are on Motown.
It doesn't matter if this show gets good reviews or a single Tony nomination.
It will run for many years.
Witness the power of instant brand recognition (in the best of ways), plus a huge marketing campaign, and a man who knew from the beginning how to spin straw into gold.
That's entertainment.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Really? I just never understood that. Instead of buying a $10 CD of the music you're going to buy a $120 ticket to sit and watch other people sing the songs?
Instead of buying a $10 CD of the music you're going to buy a $120 ticket to sit and watch other people sing the songs?
Yes, I'm sure that is all there is to the show. It's exactly like listening to a CD, but with other people singing. Why would anyone see the revival of Chicago if they have the Original Cast recording at home? It's madness!
I don't think this would do well at all in the West End even though they do like some trash.
This is totally West End-able. With long runs of Buddy, The Rat Pack, Jersey Boys, Thriller: Live, Dreamboats and Petticoats, Mamma Mia and We Will Rock You, I think this may be a slam dunk.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
"Diana Ross, for instance, is more more revered there than here."
There's a reason her last tour bombed...
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
Yes, I think it brings a lot of people to the theatre who don't normally go. First of all, it's pretty rare to see so many black people in the theatre (just being honest). Second, I heard *tons* of comments about how this was the first Broadway show people were seeing, or the first show they were seeing in years, and the Motown name is what brought them there.
Why does Riedel think that Hands on a Hardbody is going to get a Best Musical nomination. iIt couldn't sell tickets, closed after a few weeks, was felt to be a total bore by a good portion of the people who did see it (judging from many comments on the boards among other things) and got mixed reviews at best
CZJ at opening night party for A Little Night Music, Dec 13, 2009.
There was a Motown musical in the UK and in the West End called Dancing in the Streets back in the 2000s so it'll interesting if Motown does come over, I'm sure it will.
This is definitely the next Mamma Mia and Jersey Boys combined. It is perfect for tourists who want to know what they're getting for their $120. They know the songs by heart and will love watching them performed regardless of plot or "drama." There's a reason those shows like Smokey Joe's Cafe ran for years.
There were so many movie to musical adaptations that wanted to use these songs (Sister Act, First Wives Club, etc) but the higher ups at Motown held their cards until they had their own show. Congrats to them. This show is cheap-ish to run (no names, no huge sets, etc) and will go for years and years.