So it's great to have an article about dance captains, but that photo of Moulin Rouge is a terrible example- and a terrible production still- with body angles all over the place. So untidy!
We're talking about that photo or about that other one?
It's the first picture on the first page of THIS WEBSITE! The one you are on. With a headline about dance captains. Do you get spoon-fed?https://www.broadwayworld.com/index.php
^ ^ ^ Is it in your nature to always be rude, or did you wake up on the wrong side of life? You could have EASILY done without that smartash comment and still posted the link.
It's the top story on this website.All the snark about "which picture?" was hardly necessary. And it's still a crap photo.
^ ^ ^ I also didn’t see it because I’m on a mobile platform (iPhone) so when I come to these message boards it’s not via the home page (I have a marker that sends me directly here to the forum). I never would’ve seen it had you not pointed it out.
Why call out a photo, when the whole page is unreadable?The layout is jumbled and none of the photos are readable. Too small and too many portraits of actors foreheads.
So we're talking about that photo? (Also, do people actually enter the website and then click on the chat board and THEN click on the Broadway section? Who have time for all that?)
It's the first picture on the first page of THIS WEBSITE! The one you are on. With a headline about dance captains. Do you get spoon-fed?It is always a good idea to provide a direct link in your post to what you are referring to because it won't always be "the first picture on the first page of this website".
© 2019 Wisdom Digital Media