I caught a production at the Drury Lane Oakbrook (outside Chicago) during the summer of 2015. Some time later, one of the creators passed away, and the project was stalled. Then several months ago it was reported here on BWW that a London production would be opening this year. Still on, anyone? Just curious.
Seriously, I think BEACHES would be hard to adapt for the stage. It's very episodic (it's like a fictional version of the "Then I wrote" movies about composers and playwrights), a style that is more conducive to film, where the camera itself is the unifying element.
Stage plays are unified by elements like plot and character. ("Unity", per Aristotle, is that feeling that everything that happens on stage is both necessary to advance the plot, and probable, meaning it follows logically from what came before.)
We enjoy unity in a play/musical because it is reassuring as opposed to real life, which is so often random.
This isn't to say BEACHES can't be adapted, but IMHO it will take a more radical transformation than merely singing "Under the Boardwalk" and "Otto Titsling".
All that being said, I admit that despite being a dyed-in-the-wool Bette Midler fan, I found the film mostly tedious when she wasn't singing. And to me, "The Wind Beneath My Wings" has always sounded condescending, if not an actual song about farting. Yet millions of moviegoers (mostly women, I assume) loved the movie.
This isn't to say BEACHES can't be adapted, but IMHO it will take a more radical transformation than merely singing "Under the Boardwalk" and "Otto Titsling".
BrodyFosse123 said: "This isn't to say BEACHES can't be adapted, but IMHO it will take a more radical transformation than merely singing "Under the Boardwalk" and "Otto Titsling".
Sweets, it WAS adapted:
"
Well, now I know. Isn't the internet wonderful? It will be interesting to see what they did with it.
GavestonPS said: All that being said, I admit that despite being a dyed-in-the-wool Bette Midler fan, I found the film mostly tedious when she wasn't singing. And to me, "The Wind Beneath My Wings" has always sounded condescending, if not an actual song about farting.
Farting...(snickers) this is a side of you we don’t often get to see, Gaveston. I like it! Yes, it’s a condescending song. Never more so than when Corky on “Life goes on” was forced to sit and adoringly watch La LuPone belt out this tedious tribute to the human spirit (or the human intestinal tract) in his ‘honor’. Corky was probably looking for the fastest route of escape.
Another day, another dollar is the reality of my mentality. Otherwise, don't even bother.- TLC
All that being said, I admit that despite being a dyed-in-the-wool Bette Midler fan, I found the film mostly tedious when she wasn't singing. And to me, "The Wind Beneath My Wings" has always sounded condescending, if not an actual song about farting.
Agreed. I've never been a fan of this treacly tear-jerker and I truly hate Wind Beneath My Wings. I mean, the first line alone just pisses me off. The creepy co-dependent You Raise Me Up is almost as bad, but Wind Beneath My Wings is like ipecac for the soul.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian