You know, I was always curious as to why Lea Michele had such a bad rep. I literally only started watching Glee three weeks ago. I had seen the pilot when it premiered in my senior year of college, but stayed away until I was in bed for three days and decided to Netflix the whole thing. I think Rivera is super talented, I think Michele is super talented. But the OP is right. If this is in fact true (which for all we know, it's not), it's reason enough for her divazilla image.
Wow. So much ridiculousness here. First of all, this next season IS the final season. So she's not in the final season. Too bad.
Secondly, ucj was partially correct in his original post... had he included "Reports say" or "The rumors are" since there are dozens of publications running with the rumor about Michele and Rivera feuding. Whether you believe them or not is UP TO YOU, but it's laughable that on a Broadway message board we are chastising ucj for simply sharing what he saw in the link.
And in case you need the sources he is referring to, have a look:
Maybe she will get a role in American Horror Story- she cameoed there before and looked unbelievably good as the top news anchor in the country in Season 2.
Thanks for those links. This seems to be the consensus:
The New York Daily News also reports that Naya is indeed being written out of the finale, but it has nothing to do with Lea. “She went off,” the newspaper reports. “But it had nothing to do with Lea.
I think it's hardly fair to criticize an OP for using what's in the source material as his thread title. Whether you choose to believe it or not is up to you. If you have an issue with the message, you take it up with the Post. Not the innocent messenger.
Wait, I'm confused. I thought the issue was the OP's saying that Michele was responsible for the firing, when all the articles (well, the one or two I looked at) were at pains to say it had nothing to do with her or their spat.
"I thought the issue was the OP's saying that Michele was responsible for the firing, when all the articles (well, the one or two I looked at) were at pains to say it had nothing to do with her or their spat."
Naya Rivera 'has been written out of Glee's fifth season finale' following her feud with co-star Lea Michele. It was already uncertain whether Rivera would be returning at all for the musicals' sixth season. The news comes after reports of 'a major altercation' occurring on the set between Naya and Lea on April 15. 'They're always icy to each other,' a source told Us Weekly.
Rumours recently suggested that Lea Michele and Naya Rivera had fallen out on the set of Glee and according to new reports, this has now resulted in Naya being "written out" of the show's Season 5 finale. After days of alleged arguments between the actresses on set, sources close to production have now confirmed to the New York Daily News that Naya will not be appearing in Glee's final episode.
“Last week rumors began circulating that an on-set ‘diva off’ between Lea Michele and Naya Rivera led to Naya being removed from set and allegedly fired,” reported PopWrapped.
^^^^ That is from the first three links I posted. So, Reg, I have no idea what you're talking about. It is inferred in five of the six articles that it was a combination of Naya's attitude and her on-set "altercation" with Lea. If you choose to believe that, Lea is part of the reason for Naya being fired. That doesn't mean it is Lea's fault. Though I don't think ucj was ever trying to suggest that. He was just posting what he read in the article, which does suggest that Lea is involved. You will clearly interpret it differently and that's your prerogative to do so, but ucj was not in the wrong and he had every right to post what he posted. Are you still confused, Reg? Or is this just your way of being incredibly passive aggressive?
And she can't use the casting couch to get back on the show like Chord Overstreet did.
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
Your attitude is, as always, crystal clear; it's your logic I didn't follow. At any rate, the OP apologizing and subsequently changing his headline implies that he thought he was drawing a conclusion without evidence.