How is it absurd? The show has signs warning of "authentic Jersey language." Even if they got rid of only half of them in the show for the movie, it would still be rated R. Plus, I highly doubt they're upset to lose the audience of under-17s showing up without a parent/guardian.
"This thread reads like a series of White House memos." — Mister Matt
I agree with the OP in my surprise. I had forgotten is was even opening soon, with so little talk.
Every other day there's a post wondering when a trailer will be released for INTO THE WOODS, and yet there's general disinterest in this movie musical.
My theory: Eastwood. It seems the sentiment here is the movie was taken up by the wrong filmmaker and looks boring.
I think it might have something to do with the fact that there's bigger movies coming out soon as well (Edge of Tomorrow, 22 Jump Street, How to Train Your Dragon 2, Transformers 4, etc.)
I agree with the OP in my surprise. I had forgotten is was even opening soon, with so little talk.
I think it's that Jersey Boys hasn't historically had a ton of discussion here no matter what. Even when the tour had just launched in 2006 and there was a 30+ page thread on it that went on to encompass the Chicago sit-down and second national tour, it was pretty much confined only to that thread. I'm going to guess it's because a lot of us lived in California at that time (three companies launched in SF and the 1NT played LA for a long time; there was the Vegas sit-down as well) and that one thread was one of the main places to talk about the show.
"This thread reads like a series of White House memos." — Mister Matt
Jersey Boys isn't a tentpole movie like the ones Jeffrey just listed, it is counter-programming, so it is going to get lost in the noise. Whereas Into the Woods is hoping to be a tentpole so they are promoting it. This movie is for people who want to see a movie, and check the listings to see if anything's playing that isn't based on a comic book, a Japanese monster, an old TV show, or a relaunch of one of the previous listed things.
Eastwood is more in the Woody Allen mode of filmmaking, make them cheaply and you'll always make your money back and, every so often, one hits and becomes bigger. Either way, you get to keep making movies. It doesn't have the $100+ million overhead of all the other movies.
It is also opening nationwide on a weekend without too much major competition (one other movie with Guy Pearce and Robert Pattinson) as far as new movies. So, it will either modestly make its money back or become a hit, both successes for Eastwood.
As for the sentiment on here, there are a lot of Broadway shows doing well that wouldn't if we used BWW sentiment as a reliable gauge of success.
"How is it absurd? The show has signs warning of "authentic Jersey language."
So what? Chicago has sex, violence, murder, adultery, etc, and yet it got a PG-13. But a few f-bombs in Jersey Boys, and it automatically gets an R rating? The MPAA is screwed up.
Jukebox musicals are fun to watch on stage due to the live element. However, they lose their specialness when brought to screen especially in this age of GLEE. Granted, the music to Jersey Boys is related to the plot, it becomes no different than movies like Walk The Line or Ray, biopics with music.
So what? Chicago has sex, violence, murder, adultery, etc, and yet it got a PG-13. But a few f-bombs in Jersey Boys, and it automatically gets an R rating? The MPAA is screwed up.
Maybe so.
And it certainly is not "a few." Don't get me wrong -- I've seen 5 companies of Jersey Boys in 3 countries, so the swearing hasn't kept me away -- but there are a lot of f-bombs. A lot. The R rating didn't surprise me at all. And you can't do anything about it now, so why waste the energy?
"This thread reads like a series of White House memos." — Mister Matt
There are already documentaries on that topic. It barely changes the fact that most people don't pay any attention to the rating of a movie they want to see. And no one who wants to see Jersey Boys is going to skip it because it is rated R. So, I don't understand the relevance?
Who are you talking to when you say sh*t like that? Complaining about the lack of attention for the movie and the rating? I hope your work on the Jersey Boys film was fantastic and you had a great time!
While I can't vouch for the Jersey Boys movie in particular, not knowing much about the show or the movie, I do agree about there being some silly imbalances in the MPAA rating guidelines. There are R-rated movies that are just as tame as other PG-13 movies (or tamer) except for a few f-bombs. Of course it's often about demographics and all. The RENT movie got a PG-13 with at least two f-bombs because that movie's fan base includes a lot of under 17 people, but here it doesn't matter as much because the intended audience is older people. Plus there are evidently more than just two or three. I think the OP was taking issue with the entire system, not just this one instance.
And as the OP says, there really hasn't been much talk about it. It's a pretty successful musical, so you would think its movie would be getting more buzz. Maybe it's because the people who are probably going to see it aren't the type who post fanatically on the internet, or the theater super-fans who post here in particular. People are going to see an advertisement on TV, go see it when it comes out and that'll be that. It's not like INTO THE WOODS where there are multiple changes, casting and various other things to speculate and discuss. It looks like a pretty straightforward adaptation.
Do the people who post here ALWAYS have to be so snarky and rude?
"Who are you talking to when you say sh*t like that? Complaining about the lack of attention for the movie and the rating?"
I'm the QUEEN. Bow down to me.
"Do the people who post here ALWAYS have to be so snarky and rude?"
I know, right? Every time I post a comment, I get snarky, sarcastic replies. Even when I'm not doing anything wrong. So I might as well play their silly little game.
How is this thread "dumb"? How is "why is nobody talking about the Jersey Boys movie" such a stupid, dumb question? I just wanna know the answer to that question. Fortunately, a couple of people agreed with me, and actually gave me reasonable explanations instead of giving me sarcastic remarks. Meanwhile, you are calling me a "f*cking idiot" when I have never EVER said anything insulting to YOU. I don't even know where you're coming from.
Please, give me more snarky comments. Go ahead and call me rude, childish names if you think that makes you mature.