Does anyone find it funny that Julie Taymor directed one of the largest grossing show, the lion king, and one of the largest flopping shows, spider man. Also does anyone thing Diane Paulus and Taymor look a like?
In our millions, in our billions, we are most powerful when we stand together. TW4C unwaveringly joins the worldwide masses, for we know our liberation is inseparably bound.
Signed,
Theater Workers for a Ceasefire
https://theaterworkersforaceasefire.com/statement
She is a great visual storyteller. One story was clearly defined before her involvement, and the other was not. Nothing funny, really. I rather more people try to create art and fail hugely than not.
Taymor didn't direct all of Spider-Man though, only for 1.0. Additional directing for 2.0 was done by someone else (Forgot his name). But I have had that thought myself. Directors have their good and bad shows.
Spiderman 2.0 is essentially Taymor's 1.0 fleshed out a bit, and the mythology downsized. They didn't create something new, just cobbled her vision into something approaching a cohesive story. I saw both.
I totally disagree; Spider-Man 1.0 was a feverdream wrapped in a bad trip wrapped in a circus. 2.0 used most of her most expensive images, but was a pretty standard theme park show.
"I totally disagree; Spider-Man 1.0 was a feverdream wrapped in a bad trip wrapped in a circus. 2.0 used most of her most expensive images, but was a pretty standard theme park show."
I still don't think they changed much there, just removed the crazy stuff, a lot of the arachne stuff, fired the geeks, and toned it up. Like, Act I used to end with the fight over the audience, so they made that the finale, etc., I saw very little in the final version that wasn't floating around lost in the original.
Boner and The Urge stabbed her in the back. They deserve every bit of bad karma their stupid new Apple album and somebody's ridiculous Hassidic bike accident has delivered to them.
Wow, that was really uncalled for. I take it you didn't care for the score but that was a pretty nasty swipe at a tremendous humanitarian who endured a horrible accient.
She has hits and flops just like anyone else. Spider-Man 1.0 was a mess but I applaud her for going out on a limb and taking a risk with the story she was trying to tell. Yes the risk failed but like haterobics said, I'd rather people took risks and failed than to have people not take any risks at all. Even though being raked over the coals by the press, the theater community and her own collaborators was a harsh price for failure.
"You drank a charm to kill John Proctor's wife! You drank a charm to kill Goody Proctor!" - Betty Parris to Abigail Williams in Arthur Miller's The Crucible
wait a second, can someone correct me if I'm wrong? They had 7 MONTHS of previews? I was actually only a freshman in high school when that show started previews, and didn't follow Broadway as much then. Julie Taymor got fired during previews is that right? And then they drastically changed the show after she left?
The choices at this point in her career are what make the difference.
She might have wanted to take on the Spider-Man challenge, but it would be naive to think she didn't know it had to work commercially and that everyone was ging to be on her case. A very different monster than The Lion King.
Her artistry works best when she can have control of the project as a whole. If there are outside sources trying to put their two cents in her work, then she's not the right choice for the project.
Listen, I don't take my clothes off for anyone, even if it is "artistic". - JANICE
You people need to read "The Song of Spider-Man" written by the playwright hired personally by Julie to help revamp the show after she fired the first writer. Amazing story and great insight on the making of Spiderman. It's really a shame the musical ended so poorly. Maybe she didn't have the best way to carry it out, but it seems like the vision Julie had for the show was incredible.