It looks just like Alice in Wonderland to me. And while I love Franco and Kuniz it'll probably butcher the books in just the same fashion. While people might hate Return to Oz, I still think it captured the bizarre fantastical elements of the Oz books, albeit being very dark.
I like that they are creating a relationship with the Wizard and the WWW. I have a feeling that he breaks her heart and that how she becomes who she is.
"I think lying to children is really important, it sets them off on the right track" -Sherie Rene Scott-
"While people might hate Return to Oz, I still think it captured the bizarre fantastical elements of the Oz books, albeit being very dark."
I love Return to Oz and it has a huge cult following, but all the people who say that it's faithful to the books IMHO haven't read the Baum books in a very long time, particularly the ones from Ozma on. Yes it uses elements, but Baum's books simply were never that dark or scary--the first one probably has the darkest elements.
If it focuses on backstory, etc, I'm ok with that--Alice in Wonderland was a mess to me because they turned it into some epic quest fantasy, which the books never were remotely.
Fun fact about Alice in Wonderland (The Johnny Depp one), the entire movie is based off of 1 poem from the original book. The big beast is the Jabberwocky, and the entire movie is about finding that beast. The entire 10-or-so line poem is about hunting the Jabberwocky. In one part of the movie, Johnny Depp is actually reciting part of the poem. I know its irrelevant to this thread, but some people brought up Alice in Wonderland, so I thought I'd throw this in.
They all call me a troll. Ok, call me a troll. If I stand on my own, so be it.
That is a fun fact, and one I'm sure nobody had ever heard before! Except it's from the second book, Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There, not the original, and probably closer to 30 or so lines, but who's counting. :P I found that aspect annoying, but of course several adaptations of Alice have used the Jabberwocky before to try to impose some sort of dramatic tension.
Most adaptations of Alice fuse both books. Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum aren't in Alice in Wonderland, either, but rather in Through the Looking-Glass.
Combining the two books generally causes confusion between the Queen of Hearts and the Red Queen, as well.
Back on topic...
The trailer does make it look very similar to the Burton Wonderland. But both share Robert Stromberg as production designer, so I suppose that was inevitable.
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."
Ri--the films ofteve it more of a narrative arc, but the books, aside from their respective entries into the the rabbit hole/mirror and the climaxes, I guess could be in almost any order (looking Glass maybe a bit less so since they try to follow some rules of chess, but...)
That is a fun fact, and one I'm sure nobody had ever heard before! Except it's from the second book, Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There, not the original, and probably closer to 30 or so lines, but who's counting. :P I found that aspect annoying, but of course several adaptations of Alice have used the Jabberwocky before to try to impose some sort of dramatic tension.
Oh! Thanks for the corrections. My girlfriend pointed this out to me a long time ago when we were watching the movie together, so I guess some of the details escaped from my mind. She actually went online and found the poem. I did find it very interesting how they could make an entire movie off of 1 poem.
They all call me a troll. Ok, call me a troll. If I stand on my own, so be it.
Alice in Wonderland is the comparison everyone keeps throwing around, and while there's definitely a fair basis for that conclusion to be made, I personally think that what's happening here visually is far more impressive than anything in that film. Not to mention, this one seems to actually have a story worth telling. I'm excited.
I just wish that Robert Downey Jr. had stayed with the project. James Franco as the Wizard isn't entirely believable to me... seems very hoaky... "I'm James Franco AS The Wizard of Oz!"...
Glad to see Zach Braff doing more, though! Even if it is a small role.
To be fair, the marketing team has pointed out that it's from the producer of Alice every chance they get, which I think has also led to the comparison (I know Alice was a huge hit, but I wish they wouldn't--nevermind the fact that many projects share at least one of the same producers and it means little--it's like all the movies sold, particularly in the late 80s, on Spielberg's name when he was a producer but didn't have all that much actual creative involvement, and the films often didn't live up to what audiences would expect from him--they still do it with the TV shows he's one of many producers on like Terra Nova and Smash last year).
I've never been satisfied with any version of AIW. The "best" might be the Tom Petty video. At least it was short. Worst offenders: 1930s version and the Irwin Allen version.
"Through The Sacrifice You Made, We Can't Believe The Price You Paid..For Love!"
I think there was a grea thread a while back in the off topic area about AIW adaptations, but yeah it's always been a problemic piece. I admit, I grew up with the Irwin Allen version so kinda adore it, even if I know it's not very good (although Carol Channing singing Jam Tomorrow *is* sheer brilliance only topped by the scene where she becomes a goat). While critics and audiences initially disliked it, I've come to appreciate the Disney version more and more (and I still think the Burton film is a stinking mess).
Anyway, Mister Matt I agree with you--aside from the saturated colours, I guess, it doesn't remind me of Wonderland.