I have seen Phylicia Rashad give the same performance in five different roles since 2004.
I take it this performance will be no different.
"Winning a Tony this year is like winning Best Attendance in third grade: no one will care but the winner and their mom."
-Kad
"I have also met him in person, and I find him to be quite funny actually. Arrogant and often misinformed, but still funny."
-bjh2114 (on Michael Riedel)
The problem, as Foster pointed out, is that every one of her performances in recent years has been identical.
I can tell you already exactly how she is going to play this. Lots of raised eyebrows, speaking in a soft, authoritative voice, plenty of glaring, and a definite sense of "Aren't I brilliant?" oozing from the stage.
That's what you get with Rashad. When it works, like in Raisin, it's brilliant. The problem is that since her success in Raisin, she's played EVERY single role she's done onstage just like that one.
I just saw Estelle in August yesterday, and I'm honestly wondering how Phylicia Rashad can do this part. She looks like someone who takes good care of herself and healthy, whereas Estelle Parsons looked a big worn and frankly, unhealthy. I've never see Phylicia Rashad onstage, so I don't know her acting too well, but I just can't see this working visually.
While I support colorblind casting in general, I'm not sure that it's quite appropriate for a play that focuses so heavily on the concept of family AND touches on race issues. Not to mention that the suspension of disbelief required will feel out of place in such a highly naturalistic production.
That said, what do I know? It may very well work, and I hope my post doesn't step on anyone's toes.
I chose, and my world was shaken. So what?
The choice may have been mistaken. The choosing was not.
I'm with the others who feel that regardless of your take on colorblind casting, this seems like a bad choice. I just think that Rashad has spent a good deal of her recent stage time grandstanding. While I can see her making the insults good and withering, I hesitate to imagine her in the softer moments. I can see the last scene in my mind's eye, and it ain't pretty. That said, I'd be thrilled if she proved me wrong!
Wow, that's some interesting casting for sure. I can't imagine how this will work, as the material is so sensitive and currently works so well as it is. As I see it Violet is not supposed to be played as anything but damaged, frail, and at times pretty evil. I just don't see Rashad as able to pull it off in this sense. I shudder to imagine Act II with her in it, not to mention the actual ending of the play.
Apparently Beverly Weston has some VERY dominant genes.
"Grease," the fourth revival of the season, is the worst show in the history of theater and represents an unparalleled assault on Western civilization and its values. - Michael Reidel
Not sure how I feel. Seems odd. I doubt both the choice of Rashad AS the right actress as well as questioning whether color blind casting will work in this situation.
Hm. IF the show lasts long enough...it will be interesting to hear the reviews.
I'm excited to be seeing this again in two weeks...I doubt I'll make it three though.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
worst news in the world. this play is my favorite because its so real and having a black lady who is too young to play an old white woman part kills it. ill have to see it again sometime before she comes.
-married a white man and had his children they wouldn't look predominantly white?
They didn't cast Grace Jones:
I love America. Just because I think gay dudes should be allowed to adopt kids and we should all have hybrid cars doesn't mean I don't love America.
[turns and winks directly into the camera]
- Liz Lemon (Tina Fey) on 30 Rock