Saw it on Monday night with the changes. STILL hard to sit through. The show's direction is as flat as a pancake. Freeman still only knew about 30% of what he was doing, and he has 0% chemistry with FM - who is only okay herself. Again, with this pedigree - it's a pretty big disapointment.
Why then are director Mike Nichols and playwright Jon Robin Baitz (co-executor of the Odets estate) butchering it as if it were a third-rate effort by a fourth-rate hack?
Audience members familiar with the play surely were startled Monday to discover that an entire six-page scene was dropped from Act 1. Audience members unfamiliar with the play must have sensed something was missing, since the first act ran a skimpy 37 minutes (with a top ticket price of $100, thank you very much).
But backstage sources whisper that the scene was cut, in part, because Freeman is struggling with his lines - which is ironic, since he's playing a character who's terrified of forgetting his lines on opening night.
Is Baitz really the playwright you want to turn to when you want to make things less boring??
"Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they've been given than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration. It's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing.”
~ Muhammad Ali
Now I am worried. It is one thing to cut a four hour Shakespeare play - another to cut a significant scene in a short play about relationships. (Ironically the one scene that I thought worked when I read it!) I am so sorry to hear that Freeman isn't better prepared - if I believe Riedel, which I usually don't.
I am surprised that they are tinkering this much. Odets' Estate may have a lot of authority, but this is a published and performed play, and people (like me) have expectations about seeing it as written. I expect the reviewers will be brutal if this goes too far from the known work.
I will wait till after the reviews and opening night...When it comes to PLAY REVIVALS- I only wanna see the 4 Tony-nominated plays.... So far... I have seen 5 - THE RITZ, PYGMALION & OLD ACQUIANTANCE..... most likely the other two that Ive seen will be nominated- CYRANO de BERGERAC & HOMECOMING.... I dont mind seeing LES LIASONS..... just to see the costumes & scenic design.... so I am still waiting for the other two nominated plays!? I live in Boston and I cannot go every weekend to NYC.
Just got back from it. I won't say too much, but the missing scene leaves a HUGE hole in proceedings. It was still listed in the actual Playbill, but an insert had the new scene listings. And yes, the "Mrs. Dodd" stuff is indeed gone.
Dropping lines is no longer a real problem, but it still feels incredibly under-rehearsed.
I've worked with Mike Nichols before...this is not unusual early in previews. I've seen him work his magic--he can turn it around surprisingly quickly. It's an odd method, but it's worked for him for many years.
I'll hold my thoughts until he's done doing his job!!
"It's not so much do what you like, as it is that you like what you do." SS
"Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana." GMarx
When The director of the recent GYPSY cut two scenes not one reviwer seemed to notice. Yes I know he wrote it. But I still feel the two missing scenes eliminate some insights into Rose's character. Was that a thread jack?
"When The director of the recent GYPSY cut two scenes not one reviwer seemed to notice. Yes I know he wrote it. But I still feel the two missing scenes eliminate some insights into Rose's character. Was that a thread jack?"
I don't necessarily have a problem with it, because as you said, it's his own work. If he's still tinkering with it all these years later, that's his choice.
In this case, we have Mike Nichols (presumably with Baitz' permission) eliminating a lengthy scene from the show because the actors can't learn their lines. Does anyone really think Odets would have approved?