perhaps they could come to a deal with the "monster" offering say a certain percentage of the population as sacrifice in order that the majority might live in peace.
r.i.p. marco, my guardian angel.
...global warming can manifest itself as heat, cool, precipitation, storms, drought, wind, or any other phenomenon, much like a shapeshifter. -- jim geraghty
pray to st. jude
i'm a sonic reducer
he was the gimmicky sort
fenchurch=mejusthavingfun=magwildwood=mmousefan=bkcollector=bradmajors=somethingtotalkabout: the fenchurch mpd collective
Of course, even feeling strongly that it's insensitive to exploit the event, I'd argue vehemently that it's any artist's right to do so. I'm not interested in blacklisting people for work that might be deemed socio-politically "wrong." If it does well -- and I betcha it does -- then it's up to the culture to have an intelligent dialogue about the merits of these works. Hey, maybe that's what we do here: intelligent dialogue.
I must say, I didn't feel WAR OF THE WORLDS offended in the quite same way, though in the film's narrative, the use of the poignant posters and makeshift memorials certainly invoked 9/11's aftermath (even if they made no sense in that film's apocolyptic context; if the world in toto in under life/death seige, who runs to the dime store for poster board and markers to create "Have You Seen?" posters? So yeah, Spielberg ripped that off rather blatently.)
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
That would be very controversial, DG, but I don't know if Cloverfield is meant to be an allegory, unless it's supposed to be about the horrors of deep-sea mining (the monster is supposed to have been awakened by a company mining for a secret ingredient for their drink "Slusho" at the bottom of the sea).
Updated On: 1/8/08 at 01:43 PM
"Volcano was one of the best movies, for that reason alone. (that and the fact that Anne Heche played it "straight" that year."
YES!! I actually live right down the street from the La Brea Tar Pits and LOVE watching that movie because it's my neighborhood going down in flames!
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
there go the deep thoughts. is the head of the company named apu?
r.i.p. marco, my guardian angel.
...global warming can manifest itself as heat, cool, precipitation, storms, drought, wind, or any other phenomenon, much like a shapeshifter. -- jim geraghty
pray to st. jude
i'm a sonic reducer
he was the gimmicky sort
fenchurch=mejusthavingfun=magwildwood=mmousefan=bkcollector=bradmajors=somethingtotalkabout: the fenchurch mpd collective
I'm becoming desensitized to the trailer, but the first few times I saw it I IMMEDIATELY thought of 9/11 and was disgusted by the lack of sensitivity. It's not about terrorists, so it's different - but the image of people standing on the streets of New York looking up as buildings are blowing up....too much.
"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy."-Charlie Manson
I guess my point is - where do you draw the line? Are 9/11 references insensitive because it was a terrorist attack? What about other disasters and tragedies? Drunk-driving accidents? Plane crashes? Can we never have a movie about a tsunami now?
Celebrate Life
Experience is what you get when you didn't get what you wanted.
- Randy Pausch
i have no problem with incidental parallels and similar imagery since they're bound to happen given the nature of the genre.
i do take offense at specifically aping iconic imagery of a tragedy merely for shock value without even the benefit of an allegory.
he's got every right to do it and i defend his right to do so. i personally am offended by it and won't be spending any of my money on the movie.
it'd be like setting a meteor movie in hiroshima or nagasaki and having the poster be a mushroom cloud over the city.
by all means do it if you want, but be forewarned that you're going to piss off upset some people. which is i'm sure their intention. use the controversy to heighten awareness and generate buzz. thanks, but i'll pass.
r.i.p. marco, my guardian angel.
...global warming can manifest itself as heat, cool, precipitation, storms, drought, wind, or any other phenomenon, much like a shapeshifter. -- jim geraghty
pray to st. jude
i'm a sonic reducer
he was the gimmicky sort
fenchurch=mejusthavingfun=magwildwood=mmousefan=bkcollector=bradmajors=somethingtotalkabout: the fenchurch mpd collective
Post 9/11 New York has become the new Tokyo in films. There are also the snips of people obviously on rooftops in Brooklyn watching lower Manhattan in flames with plumes of smoke.
Those Blocked: SueStorm. N2N Nate. Good riddence to stupid! Rad-Z, shill begone!
They also were filming the populace, dirty and injured trudging across the Brooklyn Bridge,(an image ingrained in my mind as I was one of the many people who had to escape Lower Manhattan that day on foot) one night when I was on my way home from work. It sort of brought back the feelings I had that day.
Those Blocked: SueStorm. N2N Nate. Good riddence to stupid! Rad-Z, shill begone!
I didn't immediately get the 9/11 imagery due to the fact that the dialogue in the trailer indicates it is an entirely different scenario and I simply decided to go along with the fictitious story being presented. That said, any film which shows the disastrous destruction of skyscrapers in Manhattan will have to live with the 9/11 stigma, not to mention the image of a plane hitting a skyscraper anywhere. At what point will it be acceptable to use such imagery again or is it deemed eternally offensive? Was there a lot of backlash from the openings of Dante's Peak, Earthquake or The Poseidon Adventure? I don't remember. Or perhaps there was enough distance from the distasters they resembled for it to be considered inoffensive.
Are all images of famous disasters equally sacred? My guess is no.
Speaking of famous disasters, I have always wanted an epic motion picture treatment of the Galveston hurricane of 1900. The biggest national disaster in the history of the country deserves a little more attention than the already-forgotten novel Isaac's Storm.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
I would like to see a movie made about the Iroquois Theatre Disaster of 1903.
Since I was working in the theatre on the 100th anniversary of the tragedy, I've been doing a lot of reading on it.
I think it would make a fascinating film.
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
'Timing' is certainly an interesting aspect. It took a few years for Viet Nam to truly get addressed - enough that for me they served as windows into something I was just young enough to have missed.
But then you have something like TITANIC - years after the fact - and the element of human tragedy took a back-seat.
Perhaps there's a point to tapping into the fresh feelings of pain, anger and hurt.
ummm, so wait, Was the Godzilla movie with Matthew Broderick cashing in on 9/11 imagery? What about Armageddon? The only reason people are saying this has 9/11 imagery is because 9/11 has happened. Pre-9/11 movies with similar imagery aren't offensive because well, you have no right to be offended by them (for having such imagery).
The moral of a the story, jsut because you have a right to be offended, doesn't mean you have to be offended. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.