pixeltracker

Is the "Male COMPANY" leaseable?

Is the "Male COMPANY" leaseable?

Skip23 Profile Photo
Skip23
#1Is the "Male COMPANY" leaseable?
Posted: 12/7/21 at 9:43pm

Now that we have the official "Female COMPANY", will it be possible to lease the "Male COMPANY" to perform?

sng
#2Is the "Male COMPANY" leaseable?
Posted: 12/7/21 at 9:46pm

you have to reach out to the licensor, but I guess it's just like genderbending a role? no?

Kad Profile Photo
Kad
#3Is the "Male COMPANY" leaseable?
Posted: 12/7/21 at 9:51pm

This production is not (yet?) licensible nor was it ever meant to supplant the existing version of the show. 


"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."

Skip23 Profile Photo
Skip23
#4Is the "Male COMPANY" leaseable?
Posted: 12/7/21 at 10:39pm

Kad said: "This production is not (yet?) licensible nor was it ever meant to supplant the existing version of the show."

But will they both be available to license?

 

 

dramamama611 Profile Photo
dramamama611
#5Is the "Male COMPANY" leaseable?
Posted: 12/7/21 at 10:48pm

Right now, you would only be able to get the male Bobby  version.  I would expect that eventually, you would be allowed to choose.


If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it? These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.

Kad Profile Photo
Kad
#6Is the "Male COMPANY" leaseable?
Posted: 12/8/21 at 11:44am

Skip23 said: "Kad said: "This production is not (yet?) licensible nor was it ever meant to supplant the existing version of the show."

But will they both be available to license?
"

The show hasn't even opened yet, that's impossible to definitively answer at this time.


"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."

ErmengardeStopSniveling Profile Photo
ErmengardeStopSniveling
#7Is the
Posted: 12/8/21 at 11:56am

Skip23 said: "Kad said: "This production is not (yet?) licensible nor was it ever meant to supplant the existing version of the show."

But will they both be available to license?
"

I would expect both will be available to license eventually, but the producer would have to choose between each before buying the rights, as the profit participants will be divided differently (Elliott, new orchestrations/arrangements, etc) for the "revisal." Not unlike how you can license either version of THE ODD COUPLE, or different versions of CABARET.

This does not feel like a LA CAGE situation, where Jerry Herman and particularly Harvey Fierstein felt the 2010 revision of LA CAGE finally achieved what they wanted with the book and made the most sense for contemporary audiences, even if it meant losing the ability to license the original orchestrations. (The 1983 version of the show cannot be licensed anymore)

Updated On: 12/8/21 at 11:56 AM

dramamama611 Profile Photo
dramamama611
#8Is the
Posted: 12/8/21 at 12:27pm

I just popped over to MTI (holder of the rights) and there are no restrictions (at least published) about securing rights to the original version.  Usually, when a show is remounted, restrictions are only placed on anyone else doing the show within a certain radius of NYC.  I was denied rights to Grease because one of the tours was going to be in Boston within a month (or so) of our dates.  (actually, our previously granted rights were pulled.)

 

 


If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it? These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.