>>I am sure everyone else just wants the film made regardless of >>the quality!
Uh, yeah. So you'd rather have a bad film than none at all? My feelings for Mr. Marshall notwithstanding, I just can't understand that position at all.
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers." Thomas Pynchon, GRAVITY'S RAINBOW
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Philip K. Dick
My blog: http://www.roscoewrites.blogspot.com/
Lighten up, elphabelle. I was asking a question about why someone would want a movie made "regardless of the quality" in a general sense. It isn't a position I understand and was asking for some clarity.
People get so threatened when someone disagrees round here.
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers." Thomas Pynchon, GRAVITY'S RAINBOW
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Philip K. Dick
My blog: http://www.roscoewrites.blogspot.com/
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers." Thomas Pynchon, GRAVITY'S RAINBOW
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Philip K. Dick
My blog: http://www.roscoewrites.blogspot.com/
I'll bet this shelves the whole production for a while, if not for good. The writer's strike killed it, and the timing was terrible. They would have been in production at the time Bardem won his Oscar, instead of just hearing the news that the strike had ended. So now, naturally, his phone is ringing off the hook. Everyone wants him, no doubt.
I'm wondering if it's really because he needs to rest though. Both Weinstein and Marshall had said they would wait to get the right stars in the picture. And it might even take years!
What happened to that idea?
On the other hand... if Iron Man hits this summer, it's going to make Robert Downey Jr. bankable again, and in that case, I would definitely test him for Guido. He certainly has the look, and if he can sing it well enough, I KNOW his acting would be great.
EDIT: I noticed a few weeks ago that IMDb.com had both Nicole Kidman and Judi Dench "rumored" for roles. I'm guessing Kidman would replace Zeta-Jones, and Dench would be Lillianne La Fleur.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
I don't think Iron Man will make Downey "bankable". Anyone could be playing that role. Did Batman make Michael Keaton bankable? No, but it made BATMAN bankable.
It made Keaton bankable, until he bowed of the third film and kissed his "interchangeable" big star career goodbye.
And from what I can tell, they are really showcasing Downey's acting in the film. I've seen some of it already. And it looks much better than I thought! I have high hopes.
EDIT: And I don't think all superhero films make their stars bankable. Some do, some don't. Christian Bale definitely became A-list from Batman Begins. But then there's that whats-his-name who played Superman recently?
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
"I think my point was that all these casting and production troubles are making me worry about the possible quality of the picture."
The quality? How about if there even WILL be a picture. I'm doubtful at this point.
"Nine" is a hard-sell to audiences anyway. The only way it might work is with big stars that people want to see/hear in a movie. Otherwise, it's just a really expensive indy art film.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
It's understandable that he's exhausted, but why did he take on the job in the first place? After seeing No Country, I can't imagine seeing him in this movie...but he is a pretty brilliant actor, so I'm sure he could pull it off.
One sad thing about his dropping out is that his current state of semi-exhaustion would probably have really helped him capture that same essence in Guido. Not that it would be fun to film in that state, but the performace might have been excellent.
I honestly don't think the picture will be made at all. That's why I don't get that they couldn't wait for Bardem. I mean he actually gave them a time when he would become available, and they said no. Honestly, out of all the stars they had lined up, Bardem was the most perfect one for the role and the one that I would have waited for. I just think the movie is dead by now and won't believe anything else until I am sitting at the theatre, eating my popcorn, and humming along to "A Call from the Vatican."
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
The problem is that they're not ready to go right now. They don't have a final script, which is why they had to stop during the strike in pre-production.
So, they're still writing the screenplay, with a start date that keeps pushing out, and they're trying to line up big stars whose "dance cards" fill up very quickly. Sometimes years in advance.
The only way this was going to work was if the entire creative team was completely flexible and catering to those stars' schedules. If they can't work around them, they don't stand a chance of getting their ideal heavy-hitting cast.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Lol, Barker, if "A Call from the Vatican" is cut. I'll just walk out...that's my favorite song from the score. Besty, you're just killing it more for me
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"