Harry Reid: Bain Investor Told Me That Mitt Romney 'Did't Pay Any Taxes For 10 Years'- Page 1

[romantico]

Posted: 7/31/12 at 5:32pm

Does anyone find this difficult to believe? I mean, even Romney supporters have to see hints of truth in this.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/31/harry-reid-romney-taxes_n_1724027.html

[SNAFU]

Posted: 7/31/12 at 5:38pm

Doesn't surpprise me in the least. We people have all we need to know however.

[D2]

Posted: 7/31/12 at 6:08pm

YOU people. I need to know more.

[Mr Roxy]

Posted: 7/31/12 at 6:15pm

Geithner didn't pay his for a few and he is Treasury Secretary.

Amazing how it comes out now. The Obama machine is humming along nicely.

[SNAFU]

Posted: 7/31/12 at 6:17pm

It is called vetting the person who wants to be President Roxy.

[FindingNamo]

Posted: 7/31/12 at 6:18pm

Do you think it is a good thing that the man who wants to be president has paid no taxes?

[Jordan Catalano]

Posted: 7/31/12 at 6:22pm

Honestly, if he came out and just said he didn't pay any taxes and that he did it all through the current loopholes available now, I wouldn't care. I might roll my eyes for a second and say "Oh, the super rich..." but after that it wouldn't even register for me.

[FindingNamo]

Posted: 7/31/12 at 6:31pm

Roxy can't even comprehend a black guy being president, so I guess asking him to imagine his feelings if Obama had paid no taxes for a decade is what my illiterate old boss might have called a mute point.

[SNAFU]

Posted: 7/31/12 at 6:38pm

Well, if Obama had paid no taxes, why he'd be livin' off da gubment free o' charge! Not fit to hold office, right Roxy?

[Gothampc]

Posted: 7/31/12 at 6:47pm

"It is called vetting the person who wants to be President Roxy."

Which wasn't done in Obama's case.

[SNAFU]

Posted: 7/31/12 at 6:49pm

Goth, if true, who was responsible for that?
Oh, wait the same party that though Palin was a good choice for VP! LMFAO! LITERALLY!

Updated On: 7/31/12 at 06:49 PM

[romantico]

Posted: 7/31/12 at 8:46pm

I'm hoping the Democrats are gonna run with this and not back down. SO, it IS A FACT unless Mitt proves us wrong and releases his tax returns.Goth and Roxy are hypocrites. Nothing more. I'd have more respect for them if they just didn't respond but to pretend that they would NOT BE OUTRAGED if this were a Democrat really shows how unfair they are.

Republicans are even saying Mitt is committing political suicide by not releasing his records. I am hoping this does not go away until Election Day. Mitt has something SO BAD that he does not want released he is allowing Democrats to make claims against him that are probably true and yet he does not dare challenge them. A real Coward.

So, to all the Romney supporting idiots who DEMANDED OBAMA RELEASE HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE BECAUSE YOU WERE AFRAID HE WAS HIDING SOMETHING. WHERE IS YOUR OUTRAGE NOW? How can you defend and support such a sneaky bastard who OBVIOUSLY has something to hide? Oh wait, it's because he is NOT Obama. ANYONE BUT OBAMA!

Nothing more than racist cowards.

Updated On: 7/31/12 at 08:46 PM

[romantico]

Posted: 8/1/12 at 10:14am

Some great questions asked. Too bad Romney and his campaign are cowards who CAN NOT answer them.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3h3xrBGToXo

[Roscoe]

Posted: 8/1/12 at 10:18am

I heard some interesting speculation on one of the morning news programs, to the effect that the real reason Romney's being so stubborn on this issue is that revealing his tax returns will show that he is actually far richer than anyone had imagined -- a billionaire rather than a mere millionaire.

[Reginald Tresilian]

Posted: 8/1/12 at 10:23am

Goth, I'm genuinely curious: What vetting should have been done in Obama's case that wasn't? And who should have done it?

[doodlenyc]

Posted: 8/1/12 at 10:49am

Reg, silly boy! You'll never get an answer!

[Gothampc]

Posted: 8/1/12 at 11:35am

"Goth, I'm genuinely curious: What vetting should have been done in Obama's case that wasn't? And who should have done it?"

You know as well as I that the media (other than Fox News) should have been more critical of Obama rather than just be cheerleaders for him.

The media should have done in depth investigations into:

his ties with Bill Ayers,
his association with Rev Wright,
how Michelle Obama actually got a high paying no-show job she wasn't qualified for and what she was supposed to do in that job
his drug use
his lies in his autobiography
exactly how he got into Columbia and who was supporting him

The list goes on and on

Posted: 8/1/12 at 11:36am

Frankly I agree with Goth: I don't think Mitt avoided paying taxes for ten years. And I think he should prove that by releasing his returns.

[SNAFU]

Posted: 8/1/12 at 11:37am

Me too Joe, all he has to do is release them and it will be proven.

[Kad]

Posted: 8/1/12 at 11:47am

I don't really believe he avoided taxes altogether, either.

I do think there's something to the "he's richer than we thought" idea, and I'm sure his returns will show he's paying an absurdly low amount of tax legally, through loopholes and etc.

[Reginald Tresilian]

Posted: 8/1/12 at 11:53am

So the media should be vetting our presidential candidates?

I didn't know that.

Posted: 8/1/12 at 12:08pm

What I always find funny about this "he wasn't vetted!" meme is that Barack Obama has had hundreds of thousands of articles written about him. Maybe millions. It's not that he wasn't "vetted" it's that the reports didn't say what the right wing wanted them to say.

To pick one at random- Michelle Obama's "no show" job. I get over a MILLION hits by Googling "Michelle Obama Hospital job." A MILLION HITS. Obviously there is a cover-up here. It all grew out of a National Review piece that tossed a bunch of big numbers around- a $300K salary, Michelle Obama working 20 hours a week, Barack Obama running for president. Somehow that grew into "Michelle had a no-show job that paid $300K a year! And she wasn't even qualified for it!"

In fact, Michelle Obama (graduate of Princeton and Harvard) worked at Chicago's top law firm (among other jobs) before taking a job at University of Chicago in 1996 and was promoted repeatedly before landing a VP job at U of C Medical center in 2002. The idea that it was a "no show" job is beyond laughable- If you doubt me, suffice to say she landed the job YEARS before Obama was well-known as anything other than a handsome young lawyer and worked her way up the ladder. And when her husband ran for president, reduced her hours (and salary) to help with his campaign before leaving in 2007.

And if you are curious, pull up some of the MILLION stories on her- you will certainly find a few that parrot this absurd story she somehow got this job through the influence of her senator husband (who we all know had a time machine, so he could EASILY travel to 1996 and make them hire his wife!). Do the research.

[romantico]

Posted: 8/1/12 at 12:23pm

Goth, STOP WATCHING FOX NEWS!

Rev Wright and Bill Ayers were covered, more so on FOX (who still continues to LIE) The FACTS were out there and the American People were okay with it. Drug use? Puh-Lease! What about GW Bush's "Drug Use"? Or him going AWOL? See, our side can play this game as well Goth. "You People" Find it difficult to believe Obama could get into a school like Harvard or Columbia. 'You People' are not racist Goth. You just can't understand how 'someone like Obama' could get into such an expensive school. I mean on top of it being so expensive you have to be smart and 'people like you' Goth do not feel Obama is smart.......but you are not racist by suggesting it. (LOL)

Goth, your HATRED towards Obama says so much about you as a person. For you to focus on Obama and then give a moron like Sarah Palin a clear pass just shows how much you hate Obama and 'his kind'.

[YouWantitWhen????]

Posted: 8/1/12 at 12:33pm

I don't understand - doesn't the fact that Goth is raising all of those issues prove that Obama was in fact vetted?

[Reginald Tresilian]

Posted: 8/1/12 at 1:19pm

Joe, the president clearly made them hire his wife retroactively.