I really like the show, its one of the few I actually look forward to watching.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
A year from now I'm going to have a very eloquent and reasoned response to your comment, the kind of response people should have had today.
And on that, Keith Olbermann and the Daily Show, to name only two examples, did the exact take on the stories they do on this show. So not only is the show armchair quarterbacking a year after the fact, there's nothing original about.
I think there's something about Sorkin stuff that makes people think they seem smart for liking it, but, god, it really is just nothing but smoke and mirrors.
One other question. Does Allison pill really move the way she does on the show all the time - that way she kind of juts her neck out while tilting her head down whenever she is required to move from one place to another - or is that a character thing?
I'm with Phyllis. As someone who managed to stick through all of Studio 60, I just find this show too painful, and seem to get more annoyed with each episode.
"The gods who nurse this universe think little of mortals' cares. They sit in crowds on exclusive clouds and laugh at our love affairs. I might have had a real romance if they'd given me a chance. I loved him, but he didn't love me. I wanted him, but he didn't want me. Then the gods had a spree and indulged in another whim. Now he loves me, but I don't love him." - Cole Porter
Yet another great episode. SO sad. Only 4 episodes left.
'There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently'
-Robert Evans-
So I get that Will was bullying the gay, black Santorum adviser and that it was supposed to be uncomfortable (which is was) but I was totally on Will's side the whole time. I don't care what your stance on abortion is, supporting a man who fundamentally thinks you are less than a man makes you a sap. And the final question really sent that point home, "Does Mr. Santorum think you are fit to be a teacher?" It was incredibly unsettling to watch but I never once felt sympathy toward Hall (I think that was the characters name).
It seemed to me that Will's problems with that interview were that
1) he was essentially doing what Santorum was doing: telling someone how to feel/what to do because of one or two things about them. Santorum: You should change because you're a gay. Will: You should be angry because you're a gay.
2) he was pushing too far. This is the biggest problem and Will knew it, too. The audience at home could plainly see that he should not back Santorum because of who he is and what Santorum says about who he is. Any viewer who could not see that would probably never have seen that. Even when the guy started to lose control and got so angry, Will still could not let that go without the last jab at him being a teacher.
It's not the place of a TV news anchor to shame them, especially not on the air and especially not one who is supposed to be Republican-aligned (even though clearly, he is not).
He was doing another "witch hunt" but this time, going after the people under the spell of the witch.
Updated On: 7/30/12 at 09:16 AM
And I didn't see the interview that way at all. If anything, I thought Will didn't hit him hard enough. I certainly didn't see any bullying in there and was confused at his remorse over it.
I think the reactor subplot was absolutely necessary in developing her character. It shows she's not just going to be the pretty girl in the office but a character capable of standing her ground (her yelling at Waterston was proof of that) with the best of them.
I don't think so. Either it shows that she can fly completely off the handle (which can make for good TV) or that she's a strong woman who doesn't like to take shlt from people (also good for TV). I think she could possibly be the most interesting character on the show as it goes on.
I felt it was pretty obvious the forcing her to lie on air to make things right is going to weigh heavily on her going forward. She also clearly lost a lot of respect for Will when he agreed. I expect some prickly-ness to come.
I just finished Louis Menand's 'New Yorker' review of Douglas Brinkley's recent Cronkite bio ("Cronkite"). One of the issues Menand raises is the mythology that has grown up around E.R. Murrow, Cronkite and the allegedly non-corporate, non-commerical "Golden Age" of network news. It's not a long article, but he makes a strong argument that there is a lot of mythology in that romantic belief. He ends the article by pointing out that Sorkin et.al. are perpetuating that myth with every episode of 'The Newsroom'.
I'm not sure if you can read NY'er articles online--I'm that guy you may have read about who still reads the actual print media version--it's in the July 9/16 issue.
You think, what do you want?
You think, make a decision...
I will, as a woman, say that Sloan is by far the best female character. Followed by Maggie in a distant second. Then that girl Neil was sleeping with. Then Maggie's friend. Mackenzie is somewhere about twenty miles away.
And I kinda really liked Don in this episode.
Cannot wait for what I presume the finale will be about. Last week, it was February. This week was April. Next week is May 2. That leaves three episodes to get it to September: the start of Occupy Wall Street.