BWW Reviews: The Jewish Museum Revisits Post-Modern Breakthroughs with OTHER PRIMARY STRUCTURES

By: May. 05, 2014
Get Access To Every Broadway Story

Unlock access to every one of the hundreds of articles published daily on BroadwayWorld by logging in with one click.




Existing user? Just click login.

Other Primary Structures at the Jewish Museum is a response to a history-making exhibition--the 1966 showcase Primary Structures: Younger American and British Sculptors, which also appeared at the Jewish Museum. It was Primary Structures that helped bring Minimalism masterminds such as Sol LeWitt, Donald Judd, Robert Morris, and Ellsworth Kelly to the fore of artistic discourse, even though that Minimalism category is blurry at best. To take a quotation from Kynaston McShine, who served as curator of painting and sculpture at the Jewish Museum in 1966, the artists on display were "not consciously allied in a school or in a specific movement, but they do share a stylistic tendency." That tendency involves "irony, paradox, mystery, ambiguity, even wit, as well as formal beauty"--valuable qualities all, even if they don't in the least help you visualize LeWitt's signature openwork cubes or Judd's totemic compartment blocks. That tendency to branch out and embrace paradox, though, matters: Art was broadening to new materials, new concepts, new modes of exhibition and interaction.


Yet for the present leadership of the Jewish Museum, Primary Structures didn't broaden out as much as could have. The show brought together artists from England, the United States, and... well, that's pretty much it. So it is that Other Primary Structures stretches far across the globe, drawing in artists from Brazil, South Korea, and the nations of Eastern Europe, to name but a few of the countries represented. To accommodate this, organizer Jens Hoffmann has split his offering into two distinct halves: Others 1 (on view right now) spotlights international artists who were working at the same time, and in the same conceptual vein, as the luminaries of Anglo American Minimalism; Others 2 (on view starting May 25) zeroes in on artworks that responded directly to Primary Structures.


Funny, how a show about formally reductive, quitessentially minimal art is so complicated. In his catalog introduction, Hoffmann emphasizes the historical burdens that Other Primary Structures must assume. The "other" in the title takes on a few different meanings: "One is literal: additional, or further works are shown. The second evokes the postcolonial 'other'--the many cultural, ethnic, and political groups that have been marginalized, suppressed, or underrepresented." This second "other" makes Other Primary Structures seem like a very solemn affair, which it isn't; it has a fair number of defects, but political preachiness isn't one of them. In fact, the spirit of this scattered yet lively show is exactly the opposite. Derivative, sure; disjointed, fine. But playful, endearing, heartwarming even if it falls far short of groundbreaking? Absolutely.


The approach to Minimalism that you'll find at Other Primary Structures is much like the approach to ecology or geology that you'll find at the Liberty Science Center. Make it quick, make it just informative enough, and above all make it fun. The installation uses close-to-lifesize photographs from the original Primary Structures as backdrops, adding an illusion of depth to the exhibition space. There is also a room featuring a scale model of the Jewish Museum, with the entries from Primary Structures reconstructed in miniature and visible through tiny windows.


It is impossible to resist walking gingerly around this large mock-up, peering through its windows, then walking around again and peering in yet again, just in case you missed anything the first time. This isn't the only time that Other Primary Structures encourages an exploratory approach. Consider, for instance, the entries by Sérgio Camargo: some of these are painted wood reliefs that group sliced cylinders into dynamic clusters (best viewed head-on, naturally), though Camargo's centerpiece is a creviced and compartmented marble tower (best viewed by from this side, then then that, then wander off, then come back and repeat). Virtual Pyramid with Exterior and Interior View by Noberto Puzzolo performs a different trick, drawing your gaze through a series of inverted-V arches and tempting you to walk right underneath.


Other works invite you to hands-on or almost-hands-on experiences. Even the best-behaved museumgoer will be unable to resist blowing on the bubbles in Cloud Canyons by David Medalla (and no, I couldn't resist). You may also feel an urge to manipulate three sheet aluminum contraptions by Lygia Clark. Give in; the accompanying caption advises you to pick up and re-arrange the works, which are quite sturdy. Elsewhere, watch out. A hanging iron fixture by Gego is positioned so low that you might smack right into it (which a number of visitors in fact do), and the sculpture Displacement by Noemí Escandel intrudes even more radically; the lower beams of this X-shaped construction stretch out like a prankster's legs, threatening to trip the unwary. An afternoon at the Jewish Museum won't make you an expert in any of the artists or artworks I've just mentioned, but you will get to know the sculptures and constructions on an almost personal level--the serious ones, the mischievous ones, the inscrutable ones, as many and as different personalities as you will find in a crowded subway car.


Though Other Primary Structures probably won't do much to reorient or revise the history of Minimalism, Hoffman's "show about a show" does hold one important lesson for both Minimalism's partisans and enemies. The fun factor in Clark's creations or Medalla's bubbles is quite obvious--perhaps more obvious than the interactive properties of a Sol LeWitt latticework. That fun factor is overlooked too often, and when it is glimpsed (as it is, amazingly, in Michael Fried's "Art and Objecthood") it is regarded as proof that all this stuff isn't really art. Sorry, but fun matters; who (other than Michael Fried) wants an art constructed purely of cold concept? Fortunately, Hoffmann has looked beyond the well-worn debates--looked even beyond his own exhibition's limitations and contrivances--to find art that is warm, welcoming, unworried, and at times quietly wise. For the first time in history, political correctness has given us something genuinely enjoyable.



Comments

To post a comment, you must register and login.

Vote Sponsor


Videos