Does anyone know what is used for the stage productions of Hairspray in the jail scene where a "can of hairspray" is used as a blow torch. Looks like some kind of sparkler effect coming from the can. Any info helpful. Thank you.
Are you asking out of curiousity or are you mounting a production? I only ask, because if you are doing the show, most local theaters (and likely ALL schools) won't let you light anything afire.
I know I cannot at my school.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
Have the actor hold a prop can, turn upstage, and use a sound effect. It's a split-second moment in the show. Not worth going for the fire permits and related expenses and hassle.
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle
eta: this might be very obvious, but assjb4ever's suggestion of "Go outside with a can of hairspray and a lit match. Spray. Boom there's your effect." is a really bad idea. Many people have been injured and even killed doing this. There's not only an out of control flame, but sometimes the can explodes, spraying flames and schrapnel.
Other than that, what Capnhook said. In Hairspray it was probably a pyro cartridge, not only expensive but dangerous. You'd need a pyro person and approval of the fire department.
Why is all this so tightly regulated? Many a nightclub fire has started by a band using special effects improperly. For example:
It's actually a spark wheel on a motor, built into a fake can. It only shoots sparks and doesn't shoot flames.
But that's not to say its still not a huge fire hazard.
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
That would have been my second guess and makes perfect sense, Diva - and you're right, it still has the huge potential of fire hazard, and would (or ought) involve a pyro pro and fire department inspection and approval.