If ANY of those people take the role I will go nuts! I saw Azaria and I love him...but if I could see either one of those guys, that would be amazing to have seen both Azaria and his replacement.
"I love talking about nothing. It is the only thing I know anything about." - Oscar Wilde
Then again I can't get tickets to see the show now and I am press. What will happen if Robin goes in. I will never see Spamalot. I am pissed. I will have to see Spamalot in a year when people are bored with it.
At first I was upset when I found out that my tickets for the summer we're after Azaria had left. Mostly I was upset for my cousin, who I'm taking, because I've already seen Azaria do it and she hasn't. But now I'm thinking these tickets might have been well worth the purchase.
"I love talking about nothing. It is the only thing I know anything about." - Oscar Wilde
I've said this in another thread, and I'll say it again. Can Robin Williams do the role(s)? Absolutely. Can he do them without suddenly making the show all about *him*?? Not so sure about that. I hope if he *does* take the role, he remembers it was written as an ensemble show, not as a vehicle for a single star. I'm sure some people here would consider that an improvement...I disagree. Just my opinion. {shrug} I think of the group mentioned in Reidel's article, I'd most like to see Kevin Kline. Of course I'm unlikely to see *any* of them, so I suppose it's a moot point...
I agree with everything Lake of the Lake said--Robin Williams could upset the balance--and Kevin Kline would be amazing. Still remember his performance in Pirates of Penzance from years ago...
And I echo Corine--now the box office will be even more impossible! I don't have the desire to stand in line for that craziness!
I have to say I have the same concern as Lady. Williams is a brilliant comedian and certainly can handle the comical singing of Spamalot, but he definitely thrives on attention aimed squarely at HIM, and I just wonder if he can work as part of an ensemble without making a big mess. The show has room for adlibbing to be sure, but he is so freakin' out of control in live performance, that, well, let's just say it will be interesting to see.
"Do you know ChrisLovesShows?" "Yes. Why, yes he does!"
Why would the producers of a show that is sold out put someone of Williams marquee value into the show now? Why would Williams want to step into a role as a replacement for his Broadway Debut (his one man stand-up notwithstanding)? If the show is already sold out through the summer they could put anyone in that show and it would not matter.
Am I the only one who is wondering why Shandling is on that list? That makes NO sense at all. His comedic style is the exact opposite of Monty Python and he never does anything outside of his persona. I simply can't imagine him as the French soldier or the Knight of Ni. I could see Williams, Kline, Martin or even Seinfeld in this role. Oliver Platt? Not so much. Most likely the names are just to create buzz, though.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
I love Martin Short --but he's preparing his own show for Broadway next season (which I will see..)Michael McKean would be great...or Rick Moranis? (where has he been lately--anyone know?)
"Why would the producers of a show that is sold out put someone of Williams marquee value into the show now? Why would Williams want to step into a role as a replacement for his Broadway Debut (his one man stand-up notwithstanding)? If the show is already sold out through the summer they could put anyone in that show and it would not matter."
Don't jump to conclusions that people will be happy with whatever they get. A LOT of people are seeing the show because of the show itself. And A LOT of people are seeing it because of the actors. At this early stage in the show's life it's not a good choice to go 4 whole months without one of the main leads in the show. The audience, who paid a lot of money for their tickets, will not be satisfied with Azaria's understudy. So, of course they're going to try and cast the role with someone who has the same, or greater, star value to keep drawing the crowds and to prevent cancellations.
"I love talking about nothing. It is the only thing I know anything about." - Oscar Wilde
Well, I'm sure the Spamalot producers are thinking about the drop in sales for The Producers when Matthew and Nathan left and want to keep people interested when Hank leaves. I felt that The Producers was so wonderfully conceived and directed that it didn't need the names, but apparently the names made a BIG difference.
So why didn't they get Williams for the Producers? I personally can't stand him, but I would think he would be more attracted to that starring role than to the ensemble nature of Spam.
And am I mistaken that if the tickets are sold you can't get a refund or exchange if the "name" actor has actually left the show.(as opposed to just being out for one night?)So since Spamalot is sold out "forever" they have nothing to loose by putting in a lesser known actor.