I will be in NYC Labor Day weekend and have several things planned besides Broadway shows (US Open, Yankee Game). My family and I already have tickets for "Hamiliton" but now I have to make a choice between the two shows the family wants to see. The rest of my family will see both but due to other events I will only get one other show. I am trying to decide between "American In Paris" and "Something Rotten" I know I will love the dancing in "American In Paris" and you can't go wrong with Gerswhin. On the other hand, "Something Rotten" looks incredibly funny and I really like the cast. Looking for some opinions.
All my support goes to Something Rotten which is a frothy delight. I love the movie An American in Paris so much and think the show is a really pale imitation. I know many don't agree! I just found it well-danced but totally lifeless otherwise.
"People have their opinions and that doesn't mean that their opinions are wrong or right. I just take it with a grain of salt because opinions are like as*holes, everyone has one".
-Felicia Finley-
It just depends on what you like. American in Paris is more along the lines of a classic show, with beautiful dancing and whatnot. Something Rotten! appeals to a certian sense of humor and it may or may not be for you.
if you want to laugh your ass off, and see a newly crowned tony winner Christian Borle, along with some of the best comedic actors broadway has to offer, see Something Rotten.
if you want to take a nap, see Paris.
"I'm an American, Damnit!!! And if it's three things I don't believe in, it's quitting and math."
I liked them both - American in Paris better than Something Rotten. But choices are pretty subjective as you can tell from this thread - and all the posts on any show. I think, based on your history of posts, you would like both. I know your family is interested in dance so that might give the nod to American in Paris.
However, I think I would give the nod to American in Paris because they are both supposed to tour and I think Something Rotten will tour better than American in Paris.
I think it's also important to know what kind of humor you're getting into with Something Rotten. Most of the jokes in Something Rotten are one of these three things:
1. In-your-face Shakespeare puns/references
2. In-your-face Musical Theatre references
3. In-your-face sex jokes/puns
There are some miscellaneous, clever jokes as well, but I'd say 85% of the humor in Something Rotten is one of the above three things. If that sounds fun to you, then go for it. I personally found the humor extremely lazy and tiresome (in the way that it was WRITTEN, not in the way it was performed), but most of the audience was laughing their asses off.
It seems to me that the people who dislike AAIP are bored by heavy-dancing and/or Gershwin music. You've already said that you will enjoy those things, so I doubt you will be bored by AAIP.
"if you want to laugh your ass off, and see a newly crowned tony winner Christian Borle, along with some of the best comedic actors broadway has to offer, see Something Rotten.
if you want to take a nap, see Paris.
I saw Christian Borle in "Peter And The Starcatcher" and he was great (liked him in SMASH also). "Something Rotten" sounds like I would have a great time and a bunch of laughs, decision decisions - lol
What did you find so boring about "American In Paris". Was it the dancing, pace of the show, music ?
"I liked them both - American in Paris better than Something Rotten. But choices are pretty subjective as you can tell from this thread - and all the posts on any show. I think, based on your history of posts, you would like both. I know your family is interested in dance so that might give the nod to American in Paris"
Both my daughters majored in dance in college, younger one is dancing professionally. Due to that, I have always enjoyed dance of all types. I haved loved shows like "Moving Out" and "Billy Elliot" due to the dancing and liked the movie "American In Paris". "Something Rotten" seems like it would be very entertaining and good for a bunch of laughs. My general feeling is I can't go wrong with either so when the time comes I will with just go with my gut decision.
Thanks everyone for your opinions, enjoyed reading them. When your opportunity to see shows on Broadway is limited, you want to make sure you make wise decisions.
Yes AAIP is a gorgeous show to look at but like a Hollywood set their is nothing behind it. It seems very sterile compared to the film. The songs they jettisoned from the movie hurt it and the actors just seemed bland. It is like a box of chocolate - some you like and some you do not. I respect your opinion of it but disagree with the final analysis.
Something Rotten was entertaining fluff. I loved the cast and agree with your description.
But AAIP was entrancing. I was caught up with it the entire show. I did not think the actors were bland. I thought the cast was wonderful. And the dancing was great. Don't tell PalJoey, but I liked more than On The Town.
Agree with your analysis - liked AAIP better.
Yankee7 - I agree with your analysis. Go with your gut. You've seen enough shows that you'll know what you want to see. And in my opinion, you will enjoy either.
Another thing you might want to consider is how often you get to NYC. Do you come relatively often (one or twice a year)? Or is this a rare opportunity for you?
Even though I think AAIP is much better than Something Rotten, you might consider seeing Something Rotten instead if you come to NYC relatively often. Rotten probably won't stay open for as long, and even if it does, you'll want to see it with Borle and BDJ, etc. AAIP will be good with or without the original cast, and will probably run for a while.
Well I would argue that Robert Fairchild and Max von Essen are worth the price of admission to American in Paris alone, and that you wouldn't want to miss their performances. Honestly, while Borle is good in Something Rotten (as is d'Aarcy James), they both have done better work in other shows, and they will continue to do good work in future shows.