PBS would also be on the chopping block. And yes, Newintown, the NEA serves functions other than as a symbol. It's vital, in fact.
"Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they've been given than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration. It's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing.”
~ Muhammad Ali
The NEA deserves to be eliminated. In the past, it has been too controversial.
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
And I'm sure you find it perfectly fine when the NEA Communications Director asks artists to specifically create works of art that support the agenda of Obama. Wink, wink, nudge, nudge, you'll get grants if you produce works of art that favorably portray national healthcare.
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
How to eliminate the NEA without cutting federal funding of the arts:
Simply take all the money the NEA gives out in grants, and divide it up to the states - the amount based on population (in other words, divide the total money by 435 and give it out based on how many congressional districts each state has). Then let the state art councils (I'm prety sure every state has one) decide who gets the money.
This way you eliminate the adminstrative costs of the NEA office in D.C., and you won't have the bible-thumping conserveatives from the South complaining about the federal government funding "obscene" art in new York.
Damn, Goth. You are pushin' the rectionary freakshow factor up to eleven lately. "Too controversial" is pretty nutty even for you. A big fan of Jesse Helms, are we?
"Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they've been given than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration. It's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing.”
~ Muhammad Ali
"Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they've been given than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration. It's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing.”
~ Muhammad Ali
Even though I love theater and the arts, I would be fine with seeing the NEA go. There are more important things for the government and tax payers to fund, like the military. Theater/arts seems so frivous compared to those things. It probalby would be best if the arts were privately funded.
Oh wait, Colle, are you being serious? How about we get out of the two dead-end wars, one of which we had no business starting, and then we can fund the NEA!
Colle, The budget for the Military for our country is necessary but what is also immediately necessary is that our economy get kick started. In many areas, arts organizations provide the only tourist revenue for local jobs, not just Broadway fare. Summer revenue in the Northeast is dependent on Williamstown, Tanglewood, Barrington Stage, Adirondack Theatre Festival, Stockbridge Theatre and any number of the arts programs that bring in tourists and money. It's show business and in many parts of our country right now, the only business that has not been out sourced. The NEA is start up money for the commerce of show business, it's not a luxury line item. The taxes I pay should provide not only for the military and the corporate seed money for banks but for the businesses of theatre. Theatre employs hundreds for the enlightenment and enjoyment of thousands.
This might be hyperbole, but to agree with eliminating the NEA as a poster on a theater website is like promoting deforestation policies on the World Wildlife Fund website.
-There's the muddle in the middle. There's the puddle where the poodle did the piddle."
I think one of the biggest failures of the NEA is that they should have taken up the task of creating a National Theater. The only real purpose of the NEA is to funnel taxpayer money to artists like the woman who smeared menstrual blood on her herself.
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
Goth, you are desperately pulling out material from 20 years ago. Nice try, though. Say a prayer for Mr. Helms for me.
"Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they've been given than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration. It's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing.”
~ Muhammad Ali
The categories available this year are down, with American Masterpieces being elimated completely. So we know what we are talking about, here are the actual categories for the NEA from last year and for this year:
2011 Access to Artistic Excellence I Literature Fellowships: Translation Projects NEA Mayors' Institute on City Design 25th Anniversary Initiative Literature Fellowships: Creative Writing (Poetry) Challenge America Fast-Track Grants
2010 Access to Artistic Excellence I Access to Artistic Excellence II American Masterpieces: Dance, Music, Musems, Presenting Literature Fellowships: Translation Projects Arts on Radio and Television Challenge America Fast-Track Grants Learning in the Arts for Children and Youth Literature Fellowships: Creative Writing (Prose) Partnerships (State and Regional)
I think arts funding in this country is something of a joke, especially compared to other countries. I'd hate to see the NEA go because it's something as opposed to nothing, but their funding is so minimal would it really effect the arts world that much? Perhaps it would. I am not an expert.
But as a symbolic gesture I hate giving validation to the notion that arts and culture are frivolous.
The government needs to fund the arts it's that simple. Art fosters creativity, imagination, innovation and critical thinking. It promotes the intellectual health of society and can also contribute to the economy. The simple fact that someone doesn't like the art produced is irrelevant and quite frankly a nonsensical argument.
I'd hate to see the NEA go because it's something as opposed to nothing, but their funding is so minimal would it really effect the arts world that much? Perhaps it would. I am not an expert.
Sure it would. I'll give you one example. An NEA grant funded much of the development and early work on a musical called Feelin' Electric.
Feelin' Electric eventually went on to become a Pulitzer Prize winning musical that we now know as next to normal.