Why No Tony

Phantom of London Profile Photo
Phantom of London
#1Why No Tony
Posted: 12/12/15 at 1:06am

tester day was meant to be yesterday, but my ipad changed that.

Anyway wiki states that the theatre holds 5,600, but I am suggesting the use here for an awards ceremony not a Broadway show, at an awards ceremony it's acceptable to use video wall.

This venue has to be better than the Beacon theatre?

I was at Elf tester day morning, bonus Friday matinee, enough said.

With the Tony awards evicted from Radio City and moving to the Beacon Theater.

Geographically it's excellent, all on one level, so people collecting awards can come straight down, alsl it's similar capacity to Radio City, so this alleviates the problem of the Beckon being too small.

So why not go here?

Updated On: 12/12/15 at 01:06 AM

TerrenceIsTheMann
#2Why No Tony
Posted: 12/12/15 at 1:08am

wut

ljay889 Profile Photo
ljay889
#3Why No Tony
Posted: 12/12/15 at 1:15am

???no

Mr Roxy Profile Photo
Mr Roxy
#4Why No Tony
Posted: 12/12/15 at 1:17am

The Beacon is about 2,700 plus seats whereas Radio City is about 6,000. 

 

This does not compute Captain Kirk.


Poster Emeritus

dramamama611 Profile Photo
dramamama611
#5Why No Tony
Posted: 12/12/15 at 1:29am

Using my impeccable investigative skills, I surmise the OP meant to suggest that the Tonys use the theater at MSG instead of the Beacon for the Tony Awards.

 

But.....ugh. 

 


If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it? These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
Updated On: 12/12/15 at 01:29 AM

Mr. Nowack Profile Photo
Mr. Nowack
#6Why No Tony
Posted: 12/12/15 at 1:31am

Isn't it a hideous venue?


Keeping BroadwayWorld Illustrated

Mr Roxy Profile Photo
Mr Roxy
#7Why No Tony
Posted: 12/12/15 at 1:44am

Yes it is . Sorta like watching a show in Hitler's bunker. Has all the ambiance of a bomb shelter. 


Poster Emeritus

Phyllis Rogers Stone
#8Why No Tony
Posted: 12/12/15 at 1:45am

This OP's post is indistinguishable from the spammy ones. 

c0113g3b0y
#9Why No Tony
Posted: 12/12/15 at 8:01am

Only if they disable that hideous criss cross lighting on the ceiling during the awards show


The thing is, besides being an utter toad of a human being, Riedel usually has the least knowledge of the topic in the room. He doesn't usually understand the content or approach of a show, and is always completely and unfailingly socially ignorant, which makes it really infuriating when Susan can't get a word in edgewise. A definitive mansplainer; it's always painful when he has female guests. I watch the show sporadically when I really want to see a guest, because it's the only theatre talkshow we have, but it would be so much better without this hateful clown in a dadcoat. (thanks ScaryWarhol)
Updated On: 12/12/15 at 08:01 AM