Surprised there isn't a thread for this yet - thoughts? I was a little surprised to hear. Do we think the "star" would replace Scott or one of the prisoners?
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
I really enjoyed this off-Broadway and I'm glad that the material continues on. I think it could work if the celebrity is going into Scott's role. She was good in the role. The role is central to the show. The rest of the cast steals the show with the much more interesting and exciting material.
Is 2ST going to put this in the Hayes before the renovations happen?
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle
You could put lots of different actresses into the show and it would probably work. As long as they're funny and natural. It's really about the men. If they went Hollywood, Elizabeth Banks might be a good choice.
I think Scott is smart enough to realize that the place could make some money on Broadway if she gives up her role to someone more famous. I mean, she's originated the role, she wrote the damn thing. I can't imagine any of the prisoners being "names" as that would kind of ruin the whole idea.
TerrenceIsTheMann said: "I'm really wondering how anyone thinks this will sell.
"
Taking my above comment as the basis, I don't see it faring well. I certainly didn't dislike it, but it was perfect where it was....off Broadway. I cannot see the masses flocking to this
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
Usually, 2ST does great work. However, this show was a vanity project and was a bore from start to finish. Felt false and phony, and almost 2 hours with no intermission. A real torture to sit through.
Could this move with a "star" in a role other than Sherie's character? I love this Off-Broadway, and think with some fine-tuning, this show could be a great contender for major awards. Call me crazy, but I thought this type of material, combined with it's approach and political material, could be Pulitzer nominated. Even though the Pulitzer committee seems to get off to anything in that makes allusions to other well known pieces of art, theatre, literature, etc.