I love "The King and I" and look forward to seeing it in early May. I'm sure that I'm in a small minority, but I've often felt that the ballet, "The Small House of Uncle Thomas" has a tendency to drag and slow the show down. This is a long show, running about 2:50 now, and I'm wondering if the ballet seems to go on a bit too long. But, even if it does, I'm not sure how any of it could be trimmed.
CZJ at opening night party for A Little Night Music, Dec 13, 2009.
I saw the show this week and personally didn't find the ballet to drag at all. I have found it to drag in other productions, and especially in its detached non-contextual presentation in Jerome Robbins Broadway. But my partner, who had never seen King and I before, and who loved the production as a whole (actually, loved it more than I did), found the ballet to go on way too long.
It's so integral to the story. It tells [in metaphor] the King about Tuptim's love affair with Lun Tha; it foreshadows the death of kings, not just the death of a king. It sets up his rageful reaction after the waltz. For me, it's one of the most brilliant moments in musical theater history and a highlight in the show.
I admired loads of staging choices in this revival, but for me the ballet was one of the weakest passages in the show. Very old-school, very "proscenium" even though they could have opted to really take advantage of the vast depth of the Beaumont stage to reconceive it. Scenically barren but for a blue drape that opened to reveal a version of Mielziner's original ladder to heaven (Buddha). I also pity those audience members seating directly behind Anna or the King who view the performance from the downstage corners. Just made me impatient to get on with the show.