How, and why, is Denzel Washington playing Walter Lee Younger in Raisin in The Sun? He is three years older than me and I am 56! I might as well start auditioning for Matt in The Fantasticks! It's 30 years too old. 30 years!
And while we are on the subject... Orlando Bloom... he is 37 years old. Why is he playing Romeo who is supposed to be 17?
Anyone have any other insane bad casting because of age? I guess it could work for Denzel, I just don't see it.
I attended one of the well known acting schools in NYC. I did a scene from "Biloxi Blues" playing Eugene. The teacher said I was a bit too old to be playing that role. I was 25 at the time.
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
I really don’t understand people complaining about Denzel’s age or the importance of Poitier’s age in the original Broadway production. There is no evidence to establish that Lorraine Hansberry wrote the play as a vehicle for Sidney Poitier, or that he was cast because his age matched the age of Walter. Also, there is nothing implausible or strange about a 60 year old man being trapped in a low wage job, and clinging to dreams of a better life while living with his 78 year old mother.
There's I think one reference to Walter's age in the script. It's not necessarily the driving force of what makes the play work or not, or the only element as to what Raisin in the Sun is about. I don't know if they are attempting to have Denzel play the role as 35, but he certainly doesn't look like a 60 year old man either, and the stage is always more forgiving than TV or film. When the casting was announced, producer Scott Rudin intriguingly told Newsday that he sees the play as being about a grown man being infantilized by his mother. If that's the approach, it's a valid and interesting one, and I think no further justification for the casting is required.
Begin at the beginning and go on till you come to the end: then stop.
It makes no sense period. Walter Lee is not about to retire. What 60 year old man uses his sisters college money to invest in a liquor store? The whole point of the show is that Walter Lee is stuck in his life as a 30 year old man, who's wife is about to have a baby. He is desperate to leave his life as a chauffeur and buy a business.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I have read this play many times, I have seen several productions, and my opinion is it's insane, illogical, and does a great disservice to the play to let Denzel Washington play this role at this point in his life. I would think he would be embarrassed.
Travis is Walter's 10-year-old son, not his brother, lovebwy.
You can be stuck in your life at any age - and again, I'm not sure that Denzel's actual age means he'll read as 60 years old on stage. Sometimes, if you go to a show to have your understanding of a play challenged, it can be rewarding. And if you choose to sit it out, that's a fair choice as well. Embarrassing? Well, it's more embarrassing when a non-actor takes on the role.
Begin at the beginning and go on till you come to the end: then stop.
Exactly. Why are people complaining? Just don't see it. There are tons of people who will pay top premium prices just to be in the same room with him, he's a phenomenal talent. It's a play, it's pretend, he can act younger.
If we're gonna play that game, why do middle-aged sopranos play the roles of Butterfly (who is supposed to be 15 or 16) and Turandot (also supposed to be a teenager)? :-p
I'm almost 30, and was told by an agency that I'm not old enough to play the lead in Kinky Boots, yet they just added a cover who is actually 5 years younger than me. So, there ya go. It's all about how it looks on stage, not your actual age. I don't look my age, so therefore, no one is going to cast me as someone who is 30, even though I almost am.
I was actually surprised to find that Denzel was almost 60. I didn't realize that. And, I know it's terrible, but I don't know anything about the play, so I'm excited to see it with a blind eye.
On stage, he'll look 40...not a huge step. Do you thing that at some magic age, people suddenly do the "right" thing? They don't.
In this day and age of people returning to live at their parents....and moochers that never left, I think this may very well have a different tone.
He's a wonderful actor: if there is any "too old" actor for role, Denzel is about as good as it could get.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
I'm more surprised they cast a 41 year old Benethea!
"Carson has combined his passion for helping children with his love for one of Cincinnati's favorite past times - cornhole - to create a unique and exciting event perfect for a corporate outing, entertaining clients or family fun."
It's all about the money and greedy producers. Denzel has proved that he is a fine stage actor, but yes, it is embarrassing to see him taking on a role of a man who is half his age. No, Diddy was not good in the role (better in the TV version, where the cameras could cut away to the remarkable actresses and fill in the dramatic voids), and yes, Denzel will be much better (he was great in FENCES), but how do they explain Walter Lee having a very young son after, what, 30+ years of marriage? Why stretch a great play out of shape? Oh right, to make a buck.
To me, the biggest hitch in a 59-year-old Walter is that his younger sister, Beneatha, needs money for her education.
So... that'd be a 40-something year gap between siblings? Even if Denzel, as dramamama rightly points out, plays younger than he is (and he usually does), a 40-something Walter still has about 20 years on Beneatha if she's at the end of her school-age-appropriate casting.
They'll still very likely do a good job with the material outside of that age objection, and the production will roll in the dough, and really that's the bottom line. Does it bother me? Sight unseen, yes. Will it bother me during the show? Hopefully not, though if the production is flat and dead than it will be difficult to ignore. Has it happened before and will it happen again? As safe a bet as there is while there are still bankable stars and roles they want to play, age recommendation be damned.
Words don't deserve that kind of malarkey. They're innocent, neutral, precise, standing for this, describing that, meaning the other, so if you look after them you can build bridges across incomprehension and chaos. But when they get their corners knocked off, they're no good anymore…I don't think writers are sacred, but words are. They deserve respect. If you get the right ones in the right order, you can nudge the world a little.
Some people have shown great restraint (not me). Whenever age issues come up on this board, Barbra Streisand's Dolly is always mentioned. Followed by, Angela Lansbury (at 37) playing the mother of Laurence Harvey (at 34) in The Manchurian Candidate.