"Oh look at the time, three more intelligent plays just closed and THE ADDAMS FAMILY made another million dollars" -Jackie Hoffman, Broadway.com Audience Awards
The artwork is superb. I'm not immediately sold on Owen as Rene, but I'm hoping he surprises me. Will be interesting to see who they get to play Song: whether they go with a relative unknown (as they did with the original) or a more established actor.
"You travel alone because other people are only there to remind you how much that hook hurts that we all bit down on. Wait for that one day we can bite free and get back out there in space where we belong, sail back over water, over skies, into space, the hook finally out of our mouths and we wander back out there in space spawning to other planets never to return hurrah to earth and we'll look back and can't even see these lives here anymore. Only the taste of blood to remind us we ever existed. The earth is small. We're gone. We're dead. We're safe."
-John Guare, Landscape of the Body
A splendid actor and a brilliant director do a revival of a very bad play. Pass.
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers." Thomas Pynchon, GRAVITY'S RAINBOW
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Philip K. Dick
My blog: http://www.roscoewrites.blogspot.com/
Not sure about the casting but I am sure that the show has a director who is not known for being of much help to actors or to any storytelling that is not visual,in a show that needs both. I like the art though it is reminiscent of Mercury Fur for no particular reason.
That really is stunning art work , the best I've seen in years
Well I didn't want to get into it, but he's a Satanist.
Every full moon he sacrifices 4 puppies to the Dark Lord and smears their blood on his paino.
This should help you understand the score for Wicked a little bit more.
Tazber's: Reply to
Is Stephen Schwartz a Practicing Christian
Roscoe said: "A splendid actor and a brilliant director do a revival of a very bad play. Pass.
"
I meant to delete this because I'm trying to be nicer these days, but I think Roscoe is out of his mind on this one.
And what could be more timely than a play about how the West meets its downfall because it doesn't bother to understand Eastern cultures?
Please, God, please: save this exquisite play from Julie Taymor.
Absolutely agree that the artwork is cool and I'm sure Taymor approved it. But she'll find a way to f*** it up yet, I fear. She's of the school that confuses directing with painting: she makes images rather than telling stories.
1. Clive Owen is a good actor and will be a box office draw, and Gallimard is probably better played by a "romantic leading man" type than a John Lithgow type.
John Lithgow's performance as Gallimard is the best or one of the best performances I've ever seen in a drama. (His performance in Durang's BEYOND THERAPY is one of the funniest.)
With respect, Baritone, you are misreading the play (and forgetting a key scene). In the locker room scene (with John Getz in the original), Gallimard confesses that he has NEVER been a ladies' man, or even a man's man. He was a wimpy kid who married a plain woman.
And THAT is one of the main reasons he is "fooled" by Song: she plays to his unmet desire to be the "romantic leading man" you mention. (I write "fooled" in quotation marks because Gallimard eventually confesses that maybe he wasn't as clueless as he has told us and himself.)
This isn't to say I am writing off Clive Owen, though he isn't obvious casting to me. Owen isn't all that handsome IMO; his sexiness comes from within and may be tempered with his acting. I hope.
"Gallimard is probably better played by a "romantic leading man" type than a John Lithgow type."
I certainly disagree, but would like to hear why you think that. Gallimard (at least in productions I've seen) is something of a pompous buffoon, not a dreamboat. The film took all theatricality out of the piece, and made it into a rather dull romance, and Irons (I thought) couldn't have been more of a snooze. But Lithgow was riveting in the original rather flamboyant production.
Good call. I am not hugely familiar with the text - I just remember reading it in college and being blown away, and I have seen it on stage only once many years ago.
Maybe they'll give Clive Owen a dorky haircut and glasses? lol.
BTW, this seems like a good play for Taymor to direct. It's supposed to be theatrical and requires more of a Julie Taymor-style director than the kind of director who is basically a glorified acting coach.