"Noel [Coward] and I were in Paris once. Adjoining rooms, of course. One night, I felt mischievous, so I knocked on Noel's door, and he asked, 'Who is it?' I lowered my voice and said 'Hotel detective. Have you got a gentleman in your room?' He answered, 'Just a minute, I'll ask him.'" (Beatrice Lillie)
There was a focus on how expensive it was to live in the city and the dearth of jobs for both ladies.
"Noel [Coward] and I were in Paris once. Adjoining rooms, of course. One night, I felt mischievous, so I knocked on Noel's door, and he asked, 'Who is it?' I lowered my voice and said 'Hotel detective. Have you got a gentleman in your room?' He answered, 'Just a minute, I'll ask him.'" (Beatrice Lillie)
The NYT piece linked above was the source of those other articles, PLFAN. And, yeah, it's a bit sad to read about how challenging things remain for Wiest, a wonderful actress. Makes me think of that Tina/Amy joke from last year's Golden Globes:
"(She's) so brilliant in 'August: Osage County,' proving that there are still great roles in Hollywood for Meryl Streeps over 60."
On a slightly related point -- although perhaps I should start a thread on this -- this is why I am on the fence about seeing "Skylight," because it annoys me how often plays and films present romantic pairings of older actors with much younger actresses, and how the mature actresses consistently get sidelined. I'm afraid that my annoyance will interfere with my appreciation for the script and performances.
"I hope this does well. I need it to extend a few days so I can see it during my March trip. Fingers crossed."
We should all hope it does well. Not so much for you, but for Ms. Wiest. If she is really about to move because she can no longer find enough work to pay for her apartment, that's pretty horrifying.
Don't see how it's any more sad for an actress than any other human.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
Dianne Wiest's apartment problems aside, I'd love to hear more about this play when it opens. The idea behind it is worth exploring, and the addition of Tonya Pinkins is definitely exciting.
I am a firm believer in serendipity- all the random pieces coming together in one wonderful moment, when suddenly you see what their purpose was all along.
My heart goes out to Ms. Wiest, one of my all time favorite actresses. It is incredibly depressing how the industry treats women over 50 who are not Meryl.
My devil's advocate response though would be why would she live in an expensive apartment all this time? The second it became a struggle, I'd consider downsizing.
Sorry, kitty. She's the only two-time Academy Award winner I can think of to whom it "literally" happens every day. Literally.
Hate to break it to you, but having an Oscar or two on your shelf does not equal financial security for life. And she is hardly the first celebrity to face these problems. Whether it's lack of work, bad investments, not saving properly, or living above your means for too long, there's any number of factors. Ms. Wiest's laissez-faire attitude towards work--if it happens, it happens, essentially--is telling. It's often the performers who have the best hustle, not necessarily the most talent, who end up with the most money.
That said, I'm looking forward to this play and to seeing these two very fine actresses work together. I wish them all the best.