Everything Michael Feingold writes is worth reading. Even his parenthetical comments are pure gold, like this one:
(What, for instance, became of Kay Twomey and Jacques Belasco, songwriters of the 12-performance thud The Girl From Nantucket [1945], about which the sharp-tongued New York Post critic Wilella Waldorf declared, "If the producers want a quote from us, they can have this: It lacks everything.")
Feingold neglects to mention that the true tragedy of LESTAT is that we still don't have a great score featuring the incomparable tenor of Hugh Panaro.
(Sorry, SIDE SHOW fans, it isn't a "great" score to me.)
I saw Hugh in Seattle productions of Company (using the original script and orchestrations!) and Sunday and he was *great* in both. I actually worried that, despite his great voice, he would suffer acting wise, but was not disappointed.
This was a fun read but I expected more insight--there was next to none. For example it's interesting that so many people (fans and non-fans) have said that Lestat was, while a mess, much better in San Francisco and that the changes made for NY were the wrong ones, etc.
Great insight re the original Anyone Can Whistle. I saw a preview and felt exactly the same way--moments of brilliance coupled with moments of bizarre wackiness. But the score, to my mind, is really remarkable---glad Feingold feels the same way.