I'll likely end up seeing it because I adore Langella, but, this play has had so many productions (and honestly, most were bad), it leaves me asking 'why'?.
Michael Grandage production of King Lear at Bam in 2011 with Sir Derek Jacobi was excellent.
Why?
I think its one of the great plays so they can do it over and over. It will most likely sell out. I am always happy going to BAM to see productions. They always have interesting work.
I never understand when people say "they just did this" or "Why another production?" If a group of artist want to tell the story and there is an audience, why not?
My only issue is all this Shakespeare is wrecking havoc on my American Express.
I'm going to keep a list. From now on anyone who says that there's no issue with the same Shakespeare play coming back every five minutes (because its just that good) is no longer allowed to say anything when a new production of GYPSY is announced or anything like that.
Put my name on the list, with a star next to it. Why should I care how many Gypy's, or anything for that matter, they stage? If it's good fine. Long running productions are actually more tiring to me. Re-stage it with a new group of artist. If it's good, it's good.
I have always been impressed by Langella but I have to admit that reading his book left me with such a bad taste that I feel less enthusiastic about watching him. Maybe I will pass this one up - depending, of course, on the rest of the cast.
I devoured the book, too. It was well written. I just thought it was unnecessarily spiteful, especially towards a number of celebrated older women. Which says a lot about Langella's character. Speaking ill of the dead is rather a questionable way to make money. Not that he is alone in doing just that.
Some years ago, Frank Langella was on Theatre Talk and was asked about Christopher Plummer's Lear. Langella said that when he went backstage afterwards, he said to Plummer, "Thanks for f___ing it up for the rest of us." Guess he figures enough time has passed.
I have Angela Lansbury on the brain and so I read this as "Angela to play Lear" and thought, she's doing Lear and The Chalk Garden as well?
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
last night was the first performance at the Harvey. if you go try to get to in the front orchestra as voices don't carry (sorry Til Tuesday) and had trouble hearing dialogue in the back;especially the women. wasn't the only one as the man in front of me mentioned it as well.
'Take me out tonight where's there's music and there's people and they're young and alive.'
I always love a good Lear, it's one of my favorites - Plummer was terrific, but I've even enjoyed Kevin Kline and F. Murray Abraham. I bet Langella will give everyone their money's worth, it's right up his alley.
It's a solid production of a play I could see monthly without complaint. Langella is fine, but doesn't knock it out of the park, ditto for much of the remaining cast, with a few highlights and a few lowlights. Very well staged.
Interesting that the Theater For A New Audience across the street from BAM is doing their own production of King Lear starting in March (agree with Hogan on the staging)
Lear is a great text, regardless of which of the two variant versions is used as the basis. I do admit, however, that I have a soft spot for when Lears are cast a little younger and look less "wizard-haggard." I feel like there's a certain extra poignancy and tragedy when rather than being simply old and senile, Lear's descent feels like not only fate and circumstance, but the onset of dementia and Alzheimer's.
I saw Olivier and McKellan on television and they were both excellent Lears. I could kick myself for missing Christopher Plummer (LCT) and Kevin Kline (NYSF) in the role.
I've seen Lear at BAM three times now, as well as Plummer and Kline, several out of town, and that one I won't mention by name at the Public. I hate ranking these things, but I do believe I'd make it Plummer, Jacobi, McKellan (actually probably second but for the fact the overall production disappointed). Langella would rank next to last of them all, though its important to recognize the company he's in. As I said before, nothing wrong with it, just nothing astonishing either. I guess now we will sit and wait for Rylance to do it, and I hope it's not long. I really think something is lost when Lear is doddering from the get-go.
Oh, I’m sorry, HH! I even read that response, but I must not have been paying attention to your avatar. I’m with you on where Lear should be at the start of the play. That Public production was just an absolute disaster from top to bottom, wasn’t it?
In some alternate universe, there’s a great, entirely different LEAR built around Bill Irwin’s fool. And maybe we’ll get Bill Irwin’s Lear someday. I just re-watched the McKelle on “Great Performances,” and he truly is a joy.
CHURCH DOOR TOUCAN GAY MARKETING PUPPIES MUSICAL THEATER STAPLES PERIOD OIL BITCHY SNARK HOLES