Watching CAT last night, I started to wonder if the very mean Big Daddy was also gay. His understanding and compassion towards his son when talking about the issue combined with his attitudes towards his wife got me thinking. I tried looking online to see if I could find any analysis that discussed this but didn't see anything.
I'd never thought of the character in this way before, and maybe it's just the way that Ciaran Hinds takes on the character, but is this common thinking or am I just reading too much into it?
"For example, in Sedgwick’s terms, Big Daddy may better exemplify homosexual panic than does Brick. Big Daddy is outwardly entirely unpanicked by possible homosexuality. He himself, he says, ‘‘knocked around in [his] time . . . slept in hobo jungles and railroad Y’s and flophouses in all the cities . . .’’ (Cat 85–86); he even implies that he had sexual relations with Straw and Ochello, who left the plantation to him. But Big Daddy’s knowingness about homosexuality and his implied comfort with it are also a strategy in dealing with double bind, also a mode of self-deception, since, in our culture, homosexuality and homosociality cannot, in fact, be distinguished. Male teenagers who attack some supposed evidence of homosexuality in a victimized boy in their group with the taunt ‘‘We Know What That Means!’’ (Sedgwick, Epistemology 204) are trying to draw a line between themselves and the homosexual and place themselves on the right side of it. In fact, any claim to know homosexuality is a lie, which, according to Sedgwick, ‘‘animates and perpetuates the mechanism of homophobic male self-ignorance and violence and manipulability’’ (Epistemology 204). Big Daddy may thus be in deeper denial than Brick, and his apparent comfort with homosexuality – which implies confidence in his heterosexuality – may be a deeper form of the ‘‘mendacity’’ than that he deplores. It is striking that, just before his scene with Brick, Big Daddy emphasizes his desire to find a woman and ‘‘strip her naked and choke her with diamonds and smother her with minks and hump her from hell to breakfast’’ (Cat 80) – a perhaps overstated display of heterosexual desire. Brick responds to Big Daddy’s forcing him to deal with his potential homosexuality by revealing to him that his family has lied to him and he is going to die shortly of cancer of the bowel. As several critics have noted, bowel cancer is associated in Williams’s writings with homosexuality; specifically, it is, as David Savran says, ‘‘the currency of moral debt in Williams’s homosexual economy’’ (101), the price that must be paid for a homosexual secret. Big Daddy’s panicked reaction to Brick’s revelation of his affliction could thus be viewed as a manifestation of – or perhaps a metaphor for – his fear of his own potential homosexuality, a fear that his urbane knowingness has only masked. Because this happens at a much deeper level of psychic symbolization than does Brick’s response to the homosexualization of his relationship with Skipper, it more accurately reflects the kind of role Sedgwick sees homosexual panic playing in our culture."
Arrell, Douglas (1), AUTHOR Source: Modern Drama; Spring2008, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p60-72, 13p
Sorry for the wonky formatting, but I was copying and pasting from a pdf.
And no one grew into anything new, we just became the worst of what we were."
^^^Formatting will be your last worry when Pal Joey catches you quoting Edie Sedgwick. And I must say, when Mr. Arrell suggests that dismay at a diagnosis of bowel cancer must mean one is a closet queen (as if straight men don't mind cancer), I see Joey's point.
The post-modernists quoted ignore the very simple fact that for Big Daddy's generation, hetero- and homosexuality were defined by sexual position (active/passive) not the sex of one's partner. As long as Big Daddy was the penetraTOR, he was secure in his normalcy. He also displays a surprisingly tolerant attitude toward penetraTEEs, such as his friends, the previous owners of the plantation, but they are the ones who are "different".
So did Big Daddy enjoy what WE would call "gay sex" when he was a young man? Apparently.
It's been a million years but I always thought Big Daddy screwed around with boys but "did his duty" and settled down with women. His anger at Brick is over Brick not being able to move on and do his duty with Maggie. It's time to put that aside and father some children, Brick.
That was just the first article that turned up when I searched my library's database... I didn't mean to imply an endorsement of either Arrell or Sedgwick, but rather to let Jordan know that he wasn't reading too much into it.
I'm sure there's more but I didn't have time to dig any deeper at that moment.
And no one grew into anything new, we just became the worst of what we were."
Jordan, according to Freud (and Williams was in Freudian analysis) almost EVERYONE is potentially bisexual.
Joe, you're right that Big Daddy implies homosexual behavior is a sort of fooling around that boys and young men try, and I'm sure he expects Brick to "grow up" and do his duty. But without rereading the play, I'm not sure that means Big Daddy prefers child play to adult heterosexual activity or that he has sublimated his own homosexuality out of "duty".
It was a pretty common attitude when I lived in the Deep South: boys fool around together and then stop when women become available to them. If that's what Daddy means, it may not even matter who penetrates whom. Age would be the defining factor rather than sexual position.
Okay, now *I'm* going to be in trouble with Joey, too.
Thank you, Joey. Yes, I meant Eve, not Edie. The former, by the way, was capable of writing an occasional page of brilliantly clear prose which she would then bury amidst many chapters of post-modernist jargon.
***
And FWIW, who among us, gay or straight, would NOT be repelled by Big Mama? I don't find that particularly significant. Updated On: 1/2/13 at 03:32 PM
Jordan, I know you don't cry in the corner because I (or anyone else) disagree with you; but I should have acknowledged that of course you are entitled to see CAT differently than I do. And differently than Williams does as well.
I think conversations bog down sometimes with too much "of course you're entitled to your opinion but" posts. But of course you are.
For the record and IIRC, Williams always insisted that Brick himself was heterosexual, that his problem is that others (his friend and his wife) fail to live up to his ideals. And that in turn causes him to question everything, including himself.
So if Williams wrote Brick as hetero, I doubt the playwright intended Big Daddy to be secretly gay. But that's just Williams' opinion. You and I are entitled to our own.
***
P.S. to Pal Joey: the irony is that I have read three books by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick. All I know about Edie is that she shot Andy Warhol. As Dan Quayle put it, "A mind is a terrible thing not to have one." Or maybe it was Antony Quayle...
Thank you, ghostlight. Yes, sometimes I'm joking. Just as often, I'm clueless. Alas, this thread appears to inspire the latter. I appreciate the correction.
Quite obviously, I don't know who the hell Edie Sedgewick is, so God only knows why I brought her up in the first place.
Updated On: 1/3/13 at 07:32 PM
I'm perfectly relaxed, Namo, and I had no problem keeping up with the actual topic of this thread.
I did make errors in a couple of flippant one-liners, which I readily admit. Doing so caused no detour in the actual discussion, however.
If you're saying that I should think twice before making wisecracks, I'll admit that you may have a point. Not saying I'll change, just that you are probably right.
"I don't know who the hell Edie Sedgewick is, so God only knows why I brought her up in the first place."
Oh, quite possibly because someone else quoted Eve Sedgwick, and the names are quite similar? Easy mistake to make. As to the rest, both Edie and Solanas had direct connections to Warhol, so you weren't totally off-base there, either.
"Maybe you should just relax and stop making such painfully visible struggles to keep up?"
And possibly you could be just a little more kind about a simple and understandable error? Consider just letting it go without making a comment that serves no other purpose than to be pointlessly nasty?
"The same way children in the South remain "babies" until they graduate from college. It's a different language."
As a Southerner all my life, I don't understand this. It's a different culture, and the language is sometimes used differently, but the heart of it is the same.
Of course to clean itself up, the film took the idea that Brick simply has to "grow up" and ran with it--instead of any specifically homosexual behaviour, Brick's problem is made one just of delayed adolescents.
It's true that in interviews Williams' maintained that Brick was straight (though he was much more vague about it after he himself publicly came out in the early 70s on TV)--but I don't buy it for a minute and I think he was just trying to twist people's perceptions and point out something by saying that. That's a massive presumption for me to make, but I think any reading of those interviews with Williams makes it pretty obvious he wasn't being fully serious.