So yesterday, the date of general ticket sales for Evita was announced, and along with it an announcement stating that Elena Roger will only be performing 6 shows a week due to Lloyd Webber's "vocally demanding score." What? This really confuses me - according to the article on playbill.com, it's typical for Evita productions to have the woman playing Eva only do 6 shows a week. Why is this a 'tradition' for Evita? Correct me if I'm wrong, but there are plenty of "vocally demanding" shows on Broadway right now, as there have been through history, and somehow other performers manage to do 8 shows a week, month after month. Why does the part of Eva Peron get a 2 show pass when other roles in other shows don't? Did Somebody, please enlighten me... (As an aside, I'm personally thrilled and hope they announce Roger's schedule so I can go on a day that she isn't performing. I'm sure she's authentic, etc, but my ears just cannot take her voice.)
Evita is a through-sung show with Eva on stage singing for nearly all of its 90 minutes. There is no other show on Broadway right now that demands that much of a singer.
I would argue that it's the most demanding role in history for a female singer on Broadway. Others may hit higher notes, but they don't sing nearly nonstop for 90 minutes.
The only comparison that can be made would be with operas and opera singers, and they don't perform eight shows a week either.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Phantom took possession of the 2-show alternate pass when Evita closed. That's why there's never been a revival of Evita. Now that they are both running and Evita was granted the pass, Phantom is going to have to close.
The tradition was obviously implemented by smart producers who in 1978 realized that the role would likely ruin the voice of any actresses attempting to sing the role 8 performances a week for more than a few months.
There have been, as Best12, points out other roles in the history of the musical theatre that may have been more difficult, but its perhaps been worth noting that this is becoming an increasingly common occurrence --
Though not a 'tradition' as is the case of EVITA, recent tours of MY FAIR LADY, WICKED and NEXT TO NORMAL have all, at one time or another, had alternate performers sharing the role to alieve vocal stress on the show's leading lady.
The tradition was obviously implemented by smart producers who in 1978 realized that the role would likely ruin the voice of any actresses attempting to sing the role 8 performances a week for more than a few months.
I thought it was implemented after Elaine Paige had already suffered some vocal damage/fatigue. Or am I mistaken?
When I see the phrase "the ____ estate", I imagine a vast mansion in the country full of monocled men and high-collared women receiving letters about productions across the country and doing spit-takes at whatever they contain.
-Kad
Per Playbill, Audra McDonald is only doing 2 performances every other 12 days with an alternate performance scheduled between performances 16-67 but only on even prime number dates and never matinees on odd number dates, excluding but not limited to dates not scheduled by the production which have the tight to perform without notice at any non scheduled performance of her choice.
Paige struggled with the role vocally early in rehearsals as did Patti LuPone, but I do think Susannah Fellows was always slated to do the two performances a week. I might be wrong, but I know people who saw the show very early in the run and who saw Fellows, so at the very least Paige didn't do the full 8 show schedule for more than a few weeks.
Fellows by the way is still a wonderful performer. Here is a recent clip of her singing (a non Evita number). She was famously much taller than Elaine Paige which apparently caused some interesting problems the first couple of times she went on.
Paige struggled with the role vocally early in rehearsals as did Patti LuPone, but I do think Susannah Fellows was always slated to do the two performances a week.
Ok, I just thought I read that her vocal troubles became more apparent when actually performing, but I guess I was misremembering.
Its also a smart marketing tool since all the gays will feel the need to pay twice to see both women play the role.
And then come back here and complain that the alternate is better and why isn't she playing the role 6 times a week.
When I see the phrase "the ____ estate", I imagine a vast mansion in the country full of monocled men and high-collared women receiving letters about productions across the country and doing spit-takes at whatever they contain.
-Kad
Speaking of understudies, I'm curious. When the main performer calls out for a performance they're scheduled to do, who goes on, the alternate or the understudy?
I always thought it was like this Lead Standby Understudy if the lead cannot go on, then the standby goes on. If standby can't go on, then understudy is on. However if its Lead Alternate/standby Understudy If lead can't go on alternate goes on then understudy? or does the alternate ONLY do her share of shows?
"Life in theater is give and take...but you need to be ready to give more then you take..."
Since Evita other shows adopted a shorter performance schedule. When Sarah Brightman did "Aspects of Love" she only did six shows a week. Lea Salonga during "Miss Saigon" only did certain performances (was it 6 or was she reduced to 5?)
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
It might be at the discretion of the management. I know at Phantom, usually when a Christine is out its the alternate that goes on. In the original production of EVITA I think the alternate was also the standby (Nancy Opel who was the original Broadway Eva understudy has said in interviews she waited over a year to get to go on, and LuPone missed a lot of performances).
Okay that makes sense. I think some shows really need to adapt the alternate system, it really does help keep the stars healthy while gives the standby/alternate/understudies chances to shine. Not saying that all parts need alternates, but some certainly do.
"Life in theater is give and take...but you need to be ready to give more then you take..."
I agree with OP. Look how well Alice Ripley did in Next to Normal, and then she took that baby out on tour!! Where are the professionals like that today?
Supposedly Jessica Lea Patty is the understudy for Eva in this revival. The alternate has apparently been cast but supposedly isn't a performer with a lot of Broadway credits or pedigree.
I agree with OP. Look how well Alice Ripley did in Next to Normal, and then she took that baby out on tour!! Where are the professionals like that today?
Yeah and she totally ruined her voice in the process and will probably never do a major role in a musical again.
Updated On: 10/28/11 at 12:48 PM