Could someone please clarify how the Tony nominating committee chooses the nominees for best orchestrations? What are they looking for? Any opinions on which musicals are likely to get nominated are welcome as well.
Is After Midnight eligible? I thought they were using original orchestrations (or close approximations done by transcribers) for the majority of the songs.
Aladdin-Danny Troob Beautiful: The Carole King Musical-Steve Sidwell The Bridges of Madison County-Jason Robert Brown Bullets Over Broadway-Doug Besterman A Gentleman's Guide to Love & Murder-Jonathan Tunick If/Then-Michael Starobin & Tom Kitt Les Miserables-Christopher Jahnke, Stephen Metcalfe, & Stephen Brooker Violet-Rick Bassett, Joseph Joubert, & Buryl Red
I agree about Danny Troob (and associates) being robbed last year.
I fear that the Tony people really don't know how to listen to or evaluate orchestrations. So often, it simply seems to go to Best Musical or Best Score, because they already decided that one sounds good, and they figure the orchestrations must be a part of that.
Many people involved in theatre don't even know what orchestrations are or what makes them good, so many (most) Tony voters probably don't know how to evaluate them. But I mean does Dakota Fanning, member of the Academy, know how to evaluate sound editing when filling out her Oscar ballot?
I still think it is pathetic that while the TonyTeam festoons awards for SOUND DESIGN and ORCHESTRATIONS, they've still come up with NO good reason to not honor MUSICAL DIRECTOR. Supposedly it is because "nobody realllllly knows what that artist DOES".... Huh? Orchestrators are a brilliant lot (well, some not so brilliant) and deserve recognition as long as the awards are being splattered about. But to not include the man or woman who first-off created the (honored) sound of the show, and made the (honored) music/lyric component come to life, and often night-after-night RUNS the show kinda makes the whole thing hypocritical. Cuz sometimes, the Musical Director makes even the orchestrations (nominated) sound better than they are!
"I still think it is pathetic that while the TonyTeam festoons awards for SOUND DESIGN and ORCHESTRATIONS, they've still come up with NO good reason to not honor MUSICAL DIRECTOR."
Up until 1964, the Tony's did have such an award: best conductor and musical director.
Well, that goes without saying that there should be an award for musical direction. Lots of MDs are running their own shows this season too. I've noticed some shows have even rightfully billed the musical director individually at the bottom with the director and choreographer. After all, the three make up the creative team.
I've done a little self-indulgent compiling of statistics.
The Orchestration award has been given 17 times since it was introduced in 1997. In 10 of those years it was given to the winner for Best Musical (Fosse, Millie, Once, Titanic, Producers, Spring Aw, In the Heights, Memphis, Book of M, Kinky; for all but the first three the show won Best Score as well).
In 3 years when that didn't happen, Best Orchestrations did coincide with Best Score (Ragtime, Piazza, Next to Normal). One can conjecture why it aligned that way rather than with the respective Best Musicals (Lion King, Spamalot, Billy Elliot), but I won't go that far afield.
So that leaves only four occasions when Orchestrations/Musical/Score went another way:
Kiss Me Kate's new Sebesky arrangements may have seemed more familiar-sounding than Aida's sound (while Contact wasn't admissible).
The new Sweeney Todd arrangements (played by the cast) were so highly publicized, the voters may have figured they were something noteworthy and award-worthy (over Jersey Boys/Chaperone).
With Movin' Out, the fact that Billy Joel shares credit for the orchestrations may well have gotten them the win (over Hairspray twice); nobody may know what orchestration really is, but hey, Bill Joel did them.
And the remaining instance, with Assassins winning (over Avenue Q twice)… who knows? Maybe it was a way to give something to Sondheim (via Starobin) for a show deemed a revival and hence ineligible as New Score or Best Musical, even though it was new to Broadway.
Or I could be full of it. But I would expect orchestrations to go to whatever wins Best Score, as that has happened 10 out of 17 times, and mostly the voters don't look beyond that.
Am I really the only one who really didn't like the Cinderella orchestrations? I liked the show, but the orchestrations sounded too thin and keyboard heavy to me.
Thank you for the correction, HeyMrMusic. I don't know how I messed that up. It doesn't undo the point I was making, but still I should get my facts straight.
Well, the tie awarded the shows that won Best Musical and Beet Score.
Cinderella too keyboard-heavy? Not to my ears at all! I thought it was a beautiful contemporary-classic sound and very lush. Like Troob's work in the earlier Disney films.
The best orchestration of the year is BRIDGES. But I am a musician who knows how to listen for what orchestration IS and DOES. Which most Tony voters sadly know nothing about.
What JRB has done with 10 musicians and using all strings and piano is stunning. There is nothing electronic in that pit - it's all acoustic. It's gorgeous.
Last year - it was a travesty that CINDERELLA did not win. KINKY BOOTS is a perfect example of voters not understanding what orchestration is.