pixeltracker

Official Debate #1. Snark here.- Page 2

Official Debate #1. Snark here.

clever name Profile Photo
clever name
#25Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 10:40pm

I'm sad to say I think Romney did very well. Not what I was hoping for when the race seems so close.

Jungle Red Profile Photo
Jungle Red
#26Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 10:41pm

I want Rachel Maddow. If the debates ever get into womens' rights and gay marriage, she's the first one I'd go to.

strummergirl Profile Photo
strummergirl
#27Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 10:42pm

Romney is getting credit with the etch-a-sketch meme being used in his debate. Yup, let's drop his vague platform and then, as Chris Hayes said, piggy-back Obama on the popular things. So here's to the sociopathic stylings of Willard Romney!

Phyllis Rogers Stone
#28Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 10:43pm

God, all day on Facebook I saw a Right-wing meme about "Lib PBS anchor Jim Lehrer." Rachel Maddow moderating would make the Right collectively explode.

madbrian Profile Photo
madbrian
#29Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 10:47pm

The MSNBC pundits are furious with Obama, saying he let Romney off too easy and wasn't aggressive enough. Matthews and Schultz are beside themselves with rage.


"It does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are 20 gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket, nor breaks my leg." -- Thomas Jefferson

Reginald Tresilian Profile Photo
Reginald Tresilian
#30Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 10:49pm

I thought Romney did exactly what he needed to do. The fact that very little he said was true probably doesn't matter.

I thought Obama was too laid back.

FindingNamo
#31Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 10:52pm

"Matthews and Schultz are beside themselves with rage."

aka their go-to emotions...


Twitter @NamoInExile Instagram none

clever name Profile Photo
clever name
#32Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 10:54pm

I agree Reg. He was too reserved.

madbrian Profile Photo
madbrian
#33Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 10:55pm

I think Obama played this as a frontrunner, safe, perhaps to a fault. It'll be interesting to see if this moves the polls at all. It'll also be interesting to see how the far right responds - will they be thrilled that Romney won the debate, or pissed that he abandoned much of their talking points?


"It does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are 20 gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket, nor breaks my leg." -- Thomas Jefferson

FindingNamo
#34Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 10:55pm

There will be a 1.5% bump for Romney.


Twitter @NamoInExile Instagram none

strummergirl Profile Photo
strummergirl
#35Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 10:56pm

Yeah my twitter feed was exploding with people very upset "the 47%" was never mentioned. I am trying to think about in what specific way he could have used it without making it be a cynical 30 second soundbite ad.

I was on Chris Hayes' side on the MSNBC panel (though he had some critical tweets too). I didn't even have to see Tweety's reaction to know what it was. Him and Andrew Sullivan often share a brain and Andrew Sullivan had a nervous breakdown on twitter over this.

Updated On: 10/3/12 at 10:56 PM

Yawper
#35Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 11:01pm

I think Obama was overwhelmed, not reserved. It's obvious who of the two is used to presenting business plans and thinking on his feet. Obama didn't present well at all.

uncageg Profile Photo
uncageg
#36Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 11:02pm

I had to work. Caught the last 5 minutes and the wrap-up. Called some friends to hear how it went and the general consensus was that Obama kind of let Romney lecture him and didn't "fight back". They said je was too reserved.


Just give the world Love.

Jungle Red Profile Photo
Jungle Red
#37Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 11:03pm

I'm wondering how much these debates really matter. Most people I know are either staunch Obama supports or staunch Republican supports that can't be swayed.

doodlenyc Profile Photo
doodlenyc
#38Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 11:05pm

Obama did a terrible job...first, why was he looking down the whole time like a child being scolded?!

Romney was lying through his teeth and wasnt challenged at all! I'm angry!!


"Carson has combined his passion for helping children with his love for one of Cincinnati's favorite past times - cornhole - to create a unique and exciting event perfect for a corporate outing, entertaining clients or family fun."

"In Oz, the verb is douchifizzation." PRS

Yawper
#39Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 11:07pm

Most people I know are either staunch Obama supports or staunch Republican supports that can't be swayed.

Debates and campaigns aren't aimed at voters who hold staunch positions.

Phyllis Rogers Stone
#40Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 11:11pm

If I'm remembering correctly, people griped about the moderators in the last election year, too. I feel like the mods only have a certain amount of leeway in how much they're allowed to challenge the candidates. Does anyone know more about how it all works? Didn't the cast of Newsnight try so hard to change the format against odds that were ultimately insurmountable?

And even if it's not in the rules, anyone who comes down on one candidate without coming down equally on the other is going to be accused of bias, not that the moderators aren't accused of bias all the time anyway.

I was pretty neutral on Jim Leher, so I'm curious what others who were unhappy with him would have liked to see.

Yawper
#41Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 11:15pm

The only thing Lehrer didn't do was hold them to their time limits. The structure of this debate was to have some direct back and forth between the candidates after the opening response to each question. Lehrer's lack of time control lost them one of the six proposed 15 minute segments.

btw Obama got about 5 more minutes of time than Romney, but the difference in presentation made it seem otherwise

strummergirl Profile Photo
strummergirl
#42Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 11:18pm

Lehrer did not seem clear on each segment transition. I mean he let one of the tangents Romney and Obama were fighting about to segue in but I was not entirely sure what they were originally talking about in the first place.

Phyllis Rogers Stone
#43Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 11:19pm

I think you both make valid points. It did seem like both Romney and Obama were able to steamroll over him.

Jungle Red Profile Photo
Jungle Red
Jim Colyer Profile Photo
Jim Colyer
#45Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 11:27pm

According to the CNN poll, 67% thought Mitt Romney won the debate. Only 25% thought Obama won.

uncageg Profile Photo
uncageg
#46Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 11:43pm

So all over the place I am seeing "Mitt lied" and posts about PBS going away. Just throwing it out there....do you think it was Obama's strategy to just let Romney dig his own hole? Did Mitt really win this debate?


Just give the world Love.

strummergirl Profile Photo
strummergirl
#47Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 11:47pm

I think that maybe the instant-reactions in social media have already showed how nothing is in a vacuum. By tomorrow there will be more questions on the upcoming jobs report effecting the race than this debate.

Obama's campaign will have a lot of video evidence to take and use against Romney's own platform vis a vis his etch-a-sketch moment in the debate.

Jungle Red Profile Photo
Jungle Red
#48Official Debate #1. Snark here.
Posted: 10/3/12 at 11:48pm

My Republican friends are saying Romney won.
My Democratic friends are saying Obama won.

I say it's too early to tell. One of my huge Republican supporting friends had one post the entire night: "I'm staying away from political debates from now on and I'm not going to vote for either of these assholes."

I probably shouldn't put that in quotes, because that's not exactly what he said. When I went to find it, he had deleted it. But his page still shows he likes Romney and Ryan.