HARVEY Previews

[supersam1026]

Posted: 5/18/12 at 4:38pm

Who's going tonight? Would love to hear any reviews!! I'm a big Parsons fan and would love to know how he does with the role.

[themysteriousgrowl]

Posted: 5/18/12 at 4:45pm

I'm also looking foward to early reports. I've got tickets for the end of next month and have had a hard time imagining Parsons in this role since it was announced.

[macnyc]

Posted: 5/18/12 at 4:59pm

I'm going Saturday night. Would love to hear comments from the first preview tonight!

[showchoirguy]

Posted: 5/18/12 at 5:36pm

Going Sunday Afternoon and very excited! Been waiting since January for this!

[Marianne2]

Posted: 5/18/12 at 7:37pm

Going to tomorrow's matinee. Can't wait.

[Rainbow High2]

Posted: 5/18/12 at 9:09pm

Going to see it on Sunday and I'm dying to read some reviews! So so excited!

[dave1606]

Posted: 5/18/12 at 11:02pm

I saw the show tonight. I have mixed feelings, mostly toward the play. It seemed very silly and rather pointless to me. That said it was funny, and I thought Parsons was solid in the role. I LOVED Jessica Hect.

My problem is that many scenes just went on and on.

There was a cute bit of stagecraft, and I definitely laughed (though not as much as most of the audience), but I don't know if I could really give it a recommendation unless you were dead-set on seeing Jim Parsons on stage.

I will say this. There was a rare standing ovation tonight. Not that it means anything on Broadway these days, but it does count for roundabout productions, which are usually followed by polite clapping.

[WhizzerMarvin]

Posted: 5/18/12 at 11:10pm

I was there, and as expected Jessica Hecht walks away with the whole show. She doesn't even need a preview period; send the critics in and let her raves roll out.

The other star of the show is the set. It's large (on three turntables) and gorgeous. It rotated flawlessly and presented a pleasant backdrop for the action.

Parsons does well, but that's mostly because it felt like he was doing a Jimmy Stewart impersonation. It's hard to imagine anyone else in the role, and with this production you don't really have to. Hecht is so different from Josephine Hull, put Parsons doesn't make any attempt to deviate from his movie counterpart.

Charles Kimbrough is his usual reliable self and mines his part for all the laughs he can. Carol Kane is fine in her very small role. The rest of the featured cast has that normal Roundabout stock feel; Myrtle Mae was particularly annoying.

The play feels a little old, but not horribly so. I like the sweetness of the final scene. I paraphrase, but lines like, "My mother advised me to go through life either being very smart or very pleasant. I used to be smart. I recommend being pleasant," are still nice medicine to swallow. By Roundabout standards this production is a brilliant masterpiece- overall it was fine with a wonderful performance by Hecht.

[Vagabond Anarchist]

Posted: 5/19/12 at 12:18am

I actually didn't think Parsons was *enough* like the Stewart portrayal. It felt much more like we were watching the character of Sheldon from Big Bang Theory do an impersonation of Elwood.

I missed the sheer innocence, as Parsons' Elwood comes off as a little more sassy, and a lot more aware of when he's being funny.

I like Parsons on TV, so it was fun to see him... but just not totally feeling him as Elwood.

Agreed about the sets being gorgeous, though!

[Auggie27]

Posted: 5/19/12 at 7:46am

I'm fascinated to hear about Hecht. When I heard the casting, I thought she was dead wrong, lacking in the comic brio and necessary energy. Just goes to show, it's easy and unfair to pigeonhole. Good for her. The play is lovely but having just read it (last summer) I'm not surprised to hear that it feels overstuffed. Its charms are many, but nowadays it reads as potentially very talky, as does ARSENIC AND OLD LACE, another vintage piece that can overstay its welcome.

[whatever2]

Posted: 5/19/12 at 1:10pm

thanks for the posts.

what's the run-time?

[WhizzerMarvin]

Posted: 5/19/12 at 1:27pm

Auggie- Harvey very much reminds me of Arsenic and Old Lace too, though I prefer the latter. I had only seen Hecht in dramatic roles (View From a Bridge, Three Sisters), but she is so special I had a feeling she would make this work. Her scene at the top of act two got such nice exit applause that it was clear the audience didn't want her to leave the stage. I don't know if she can sing, but I'd love to see her do a MUFTI of Say Hello to Harvey! (What a terrible idea to reset Say Hello in the present btw.)

[Owen22]

Posted: 5/19/12 at 5:46pm

Wow, I thought Parsons's was a dramatic departure from Jimmy Stewarts's. There's charm there, but a completely different type of charm. More pragmatic, less genteel. But a worthy interpretation I thought, and he'll only get better. I have never seen Big Bang Theory but what clips I've seen seems unike what he's doing on the Studio 54 Stage.

Again, as all have said, Jessica Hecht, in a somewhat stylized performance, is magic. She's amazing. And the set is magnificent as well.

It IS an old fashioned play, but its sentiments (let alone its use of a supernatural entity) seems attuned to our times.

PLUS: Harry from "Mad Men" plays the orderly. How did I miss that? Was so pleasantly surprised when he walked onstage.

[Marianne2]

Posted: 5/19/12 at 9:12pm

I was at this afternoon's show. I don't know much about the show, movie, or Jim Parsons, so I didn't really have anything to compare it to. But, I did enjoy it. I totally agree with what everyone is saying about Jessica Hecht. She was great. I'm not sure if it had to do with timing or what, but I think it could be trimmed down a bit, if that is possible. Act 1 was good, but act 2 was better. It just felt like it was a tiny bit too long though for what it is.

[macnyc]

Posted: 5/19/12 at 11:10pm

I didn't see The Normal Heart last year, so the only other Jim Parsons role I'm familiar with is Sheldon on The Big Bang Theory. I saw a lot of Sheldon--probably too much Sheldon--in his portrayal of Elwood. I think that Parsons should avoid playing lovable eccentrics for a while. My husband thought he was terribly miscast, way too young for the part.

Jessica Hecht was a commanding presence, but I was detecting a Swedish or some kind of Scandinavian accent. That kind of threw me off a bit, as no one else in the play had one. And I was surprised that Rich Sommer took that role as the orderly. It was kind of an icky part, and all the lasciviousness reminded me of Harry, the jerky guy he plays on Mad Men. He would have done a lot better playing the young doctor.

So, to sum up: If someone wanted a vehicle for Jim Parsons, I have to think there was something more suitable out there for him.










Updated On: 5/20/12 at 11:10 PM

[choitoy]

Posted: 5/20/12 at 12:33am

Isn't Jim Parsons approaching 40? How old is Elwood supposed to be then?

[WhizzerMarvin]

Posted: 5/20/12 at 12:35am

Elwood is 39 in the script and Jim Parsons happens to be 39 so on paper his age is perfect. I agree that he plays younger than 39 on stage though.

[After Eight]

Posted: 5/20/12 at 5:30am

I thought the prouction was fairly flat, due mainly to the direction. Not enough get up and go. Jim Parsons struck me as a mite bland. Jessica Hecht commands a stage, but I too found her accent somewhat disconcerting. Larry Bryggman and Carol Kane succeeded best in capturing the spirit of the piece.

[jacobtsf]

Posted: 5/20/12 at 10:40am

I was afraid the show would feel very dated, but am happy to say that it did not. The revolving set was perfect for this production, and the few moments of stage magic were cute and not too much at all.

I know I am in the minority, but I thought Hecht's performance was beyond terrible last night. Maybe it was an off performance compared to the first preview, but the weird accent and the odd quirks (like waving her hands around, and talking to everyone like they were 2 years old) were just annoying and I longed for her to get off stage so I could see some real performances. When she got exit applause after her second act scene I was in absolute shock.

I also felt Parsons was nothing like Stewart (and I was expecting him to be). He was great, and I believe he can get even better (especially when interacting with Harvey, those were the only moments I feel he didn't have down perfectly). His Harvey is one who has been a part of the real world, and no longer wishes to be stuck into what society demands he be.

Poor Charles Kimbrough fumbled his way through his first act scene, not sure he got more than 3 lines right, but his second act was wonderful. And as someone who has never seen Mad Men I loved Rich Sommer's Harry.

Updated On: 5/20/12 at 10:40 AM

[everythingtaboo]

Posted: 5/20/12 at 1:01pm

I've never seen the anything Harvey, but I'm not sure why people are expecting Parsons to do a Stewart impersonation. Why would they even want to try to impersonate it, and why would Parsons want his Broadway leading debut to be that?

[jacobtsf]

Posted: 5/20/12 at 1:33pm

I won't speak for others, but I feel the role itself is written in a way that lends itself to a "Stewart style" of performance. That was why I was expecting it, and why I was pleasantly surprised that it was not the case.

[Buffyfan51]

Posted: 5/20/12 at 1:51pm

Any info on possible rush tickets or stage door info?

[Owen22]

Posted: 5/20/12 at 2:03pm

The main difference with Stewart and Parsons is you never for once believe Stewart's Elwood might be insane....eccentric, maybe, but mentally sound. Parsons you're never quite sure if he's gone mental (SPOILERS: until you realize Harvey is real), its a semi-idiot savant take on the role...

[Marianne2]

Posted: 5/20/12 at 2:10pm

Rush is probably the same as it is for all Roundabout shows. Jim Parsons did come out and sign autographs after the matinee yesterday. I don't think anyone else did. But then, I left as soon as Jim signed my playbill because I had to go catch my bus. It was a bit crowded, but nothing as insane as How to Succeed or other shows with big names. No idea if it will get worse or not. But, we were told Jim would not stop and pose for pictures, but we could take some as he was come down the line. However, I think he did do it for a few people.

[mamaleh]

Posted: 5/20/12 at 3:34pm

Saw yesterday's matinee, which was only the second performance. Yes, the play's a bit dated and some scenes went on a bit too long--especially those in the sanitarium. Not really fair to single out just Kimbrough's line flubs; Larry Bryggman also made a few "gaffes by Gaffney," as I called them. He's portraying Judge Gaffney but a couple of times referred to himself as "Doctor." Still, both very minor flubs and totally to be expected at such an early stage and didn't deter from my (mostly) enjoyment of the performance. Parsons and Hecht were amazingly spot-on. My only real demur was lack of projection at times, resulting in several laugh-worthy lines not heard by the rear mezz. Was it mic'd? I guess you can't have it both ways: Ah, the old conundrum--natural sound vs. audibility issues.

Updated On: 5/20/12 at 03:34 PM