"Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they've been given than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration. It's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing.”
~ Muhammad Ali
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
I love the history of Tom of Finland and their place in the history of gay culture. I even have a Tom of Finland bedspread in my linen closet (courtesy of a friend who used to work in a sex toy factory -- no joke), but does anyone actually find Tom of Finland artwork, I dunno, arousing? It always struck me as comical and bit silly, but I could never tell if the original artist intended the work to be so camp.
What do we think it says about Finland, gay marriage and Tom of Finland's homoeroticism that the first outlaws the second but celebrates the third with state-issued postage stamps?
Horse, I think they're seen as campy today. But back when I was young, there really was no easily accessible gay porn as it was illegal until the 70s. So your only option for arousal was hoping there would be a man with one of the girls in your father's Penthouse magazine. TofF was arousing because, in many cases, it was the ONLY access a young gay person had to anything remotely acknowledging what they were feeling. It was presented as beefcake back then, which was legal. It was homoerotic, but not overtly gay.
Different times...before that, everyone relied on the underwear section of the Sears catalog.
Art has a double face, of expression and illusion.
Horesetears, I find Tom of Finland's art extremely erotic and highly arousing. Artscallion, I think you might have limited exposure to Tom of Finalnd. Much of his art work is extremely graphic and, and given that it shows men having sex with each other, in all varieties (foreplay to intercourse to group sex to unconventional sex) definitely overtly gay.