Why? Just like Ebersole, Donna got RAVES for Follies.
I am a firm believer in serendipity- all the random pieces coming together in one wonderful moment, when suddenly you see what their purpose was all along.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
You never know, Ljay, he may have Stacey's number.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
The revival was produced by Roundabout which is a non-profit organization so it couldn't have flopped/recouped. It just is considered the most lackluster, ill-conceived, miscast, misdirected, and terribly choreographed out of the major FOLLIES productions. In my opinion, it was a waste of a revival so it shouldn't stop them from bringing the Encores! production. And as much as I enjoyed Clark (I thought her Sally was fascinating), in my opinion, Murphy stole the show right from under her every time they had a scene together. I'll never forget the audience reaction after Murphy's reading of the line: "I never dip beneath the surface."
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
Well, I'm all for it, So I DO hope they bring it to Broadway!!!!!! I LOVE the score and own all "Follies" recordings; however I have yet to see a production of it; so I would LOVE to see this......as well as buy a Cast Recording of it!!!!!!
But I guess the fact that it was revived in 2001 shouldn't matter since "Gypsy" was revived in 2003.
I say bring them Both to Broadway. And my early tony prediction would be for Patti because I think voters will also want to reward her for "Sweeney Todd".
Well, Brian Stokes Mitchell himself says that his KISS ME KATE Tony was given to him because of RAGTIME and I personally believe that Chita Rivera's THE RINK Tony was given to her because she had been nominated a few times before without a win (everyone I know who saw both Rivera and Peters comment on the fact that Peters was the better actress that season). Murphy wasn't gonna get the Tony for WONDERFUL TOWN anyways, her run was too controversial, that should've been Tonya Pinkins' second Tony. Now, I'd have voted for her this past season, her Lenya was magnificent but nothing compares to her Phyllis. If she ever wins a Tony for Phyllis, it will be for that role alone.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
I personally believe that Chita Rivera's THE RINK Tony was given to her because she had been nominated a few times before without a win (everyone I know who saw both Rivera and Peters comment on the fact that Peters was the better actress that season).
- We've had this same exact discussion before. But I'll repeat myself. I really think Chita had the harder task that year. Not acting wise. But she had to shine in a mediocre show. Not many actresses do that. She took an okay role in an okay show and just created something spectacular. Granted, it was unfair she lost so many times before. I feel that was Chita's year. Bernadette was blessed with brilliant material... a role that was written to make her shine. Chita had to put even more effort into her role to rise above mediocre material.
Yo, americanboy. I'm saying that in those performances, in those shows, with those specific awards, that would be my... I dunno.
No reason to get pissy. Oy.
Even though I fully 'got' Ebersole's performance in Grey Gardens, and was entirely blown away, something moved me in a more profound way about Murphy's. I'm not necessarily saying one was better, I’m saying that one hit me deeper for any number of reasons (ex – my connection to the piece/character, her new take on the role, etc.).
If Donna Murphy was up for a Tony last season for Follies, I do not think she would have beaten Ebersole. This was Ebersole’s year, and there was absolutely no question about it (at least for me).
SondheimGeek: Is it slightly pathetic that you guys get to be Jedi bitches, and I'm Bitchy the Hutt?
LizzieCurry: No, you're more memorable
"But those two performances (she did win the Drama Desk for WONDERFUL TOWN...) may give her the slightest edge over Patti."
And could Patti's performances in ANYTHING GOES and SWEENEY TODD give her the slightest edge over Donna?
I am a firm believer in serendipity- all the random pieces coming together in one wonderful moment, when suddenly you see what their purpose was all along.
I agree that "Anything Goes" was a while ago and probably too long ago to get a "make up" award, but if anyone remembers it, it would probably be Tony Voters!