pixeltracker

What’s filling the Neil Simon, longacre, lyceum, neder, broadway theatre- Page 6

What’s filling the Neil Simon, longacre, lyceum, neder, broadway theatre

Hamilfan2
#125Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 12:03am

Isn’t Six all but confirmed for the Longacre in the Spring?

Clyde15
#126Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 1:39am

Someone posted Six was taking the Brookes after Waitress on another thread

Jordan Catalano Profile Photo
Jordan Catalano
#127Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 1:51am

That’s a very long time to hold a theatre dark for. I mean, “The Prom” is closing in the middle of summer and it sure won’t take the Fall and the Winter to get that house ready for something like “Six”.

sethepstein12
#128Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 7:57am

Hamilfan2 said: "Isn’t Six all but confirmed for the Longacre in the Spring? "

Someone posted in another thread that it's taking the Brooks Atkinson after Waitress closes

Mike Barrett  Profile Photo
Mike Barrett
#129Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 8:12am

If Six is at the Brooks this spring then id say whoever posted abut Secret Life of Bees this fall  at the Longacre is likely correct. 

JVJ93
#130Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 8:14am

Mike Barrett said: "If Six is at the Brooks this spring then id say whoever posted abut Secret Life of Bees this fall at the Longacreis likely correct."

I heard Secret Life of Bees will take the Booth 

OhHiii
#131Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 8:17am

BritCrit said: "Mike Barrett said: "Brooks Atkinson now available for Spring 2020 as well. Not sure what would play here. Seems like a potential nice house for The Secret Life of Bees."

I would personally choose a play or musical where most of the creative team are female. It would be a good way of showing that Waitress has succeeded in allowingfemale creative teams to flourish on Broadway. The Secret Life of Bees has a feamle book writer and lyricist, so it could be selected...
"

I'm not sure why this line of thinking always comes out in these sorts of threads...the creative team has literally zero say in the theatre any given show goes into. Just not how the real estate works. Sure, they can have requirements for their production (like stage size, wing space, etc.), but that's where it ends.

I've heard murmurings of a few of the houses getting filled.

Nederlander - Once Upon A One More Time

Longacre - Diana

Simon - Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough

Brooks - Maybe Dreamgirls?

Studio 54 - Six

If I had to guess, Secret Life of Bees would be a great fit in the Cort. Lehman Trilogy is still circling I'd imagine (maybe one of the open Nederlander houses?) and Blue which could in theory end up at the Lyceum. Not surprised no one is rushing to take the Lyceum for the Fall given the rest of the open houses popping up. I wouldn't be surprised if the Sondheim opens up shortly as well. 

Mike Barrett  Profile Photo
Mike Barrett
#132Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 8:27am

JVJ93 said: "Mike Barrett said: "If Six is at the Brooks this spring then id say whoever posted abut Secret Life of Bees this fall at the Longacreis likely correct."

I heard Secret Life of Bees will take the Booth
"

Oh id love this. 

OhHiii
#133Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 8:43am

I heard Secret Life of Bees will take the Booth"

Oh id love this.
"

 

Ohhhh I forgot about the Booth, but YES.

Mike Barrett  Profile Photo
Mike Barrett
#134Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 8:50am

Is Secret Life of Bees "commercial" enough to not play MTC? I believe the Friedman still has a spot open next spring. I remember some rumors of Lempicka playing there, that'd be AWESOME. 

JBroadway Profile Photo
JBroadway
#135Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 9:16am

Mike Barrett said: "Is Secret Life of Bees "commercial" enough to not play MTC?”

 

I’m confused by your phrasing. It sounds like you’re implying that Bees is not commercial enough to play anywhere except as part of MTC’s season, which I don’t think is true at all. It might not be the most commercial of musicals, but it will likely have enough power as a prestige piece to get attention - or at least that will be what investors are banking on. 

Also, this show is very unlike MTC’s usual programming. Mainly because they rarely ever do musicals. They could always make an exception for something like Lempicka, but dobutfully for something like Bees. It would be surprising to see them take on a show that already started at another NYC non-profit. I suppose they COULD rent the theatre out, but I’ve never known them to do that in the 5 or so years I’ve been following MTC. Plus they would only be able to lease it for a limited run, because MTC has to produce a full season for their subscribers. 

Mike Barrett  Profile Photo
Mike Barrett
#136Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 9:32am

Sorry, my point was not that I thought it Wasn't commercial enough, but I was just wondering if we should expect it to be part of MTC's season or not or if that has a chance to take its spring slot. Thats all. I know they often don't do muscials or more commercial productions if that makes sense so that was my reasoning. 

ErmengardeStopSniveling Profile Photo
ErmengardeStopSniveling
#137Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 9:59am

Secret Life Of Bees will not be playing MTC. It has commercial producers attached. (MTC has also only done 3 musicals in the past 25 years and two were brought to them by Hal Prince.)

VintageSnarker
#138Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 10:14am

inception said: "Interesting. The review in the New Yorker of Secret Life of Bees didn't make it sound Broadway ready. The writer especially mentions that set is "workshop-like.""

Aside from some little things that were mimed and would probably be done differently in a bigger production, I think the staging was intentionally "rustic." I liked having the band on stage and everything associated with the bees and that setting. What they need to do is work on those lyrics. As much as the performers were selling it, at times the lyrics approached Bright Star levels of bad. 

An usher at Hillary and Clinton mentioned Slave Play would be coming in so that seemed pretty set unless they decide to switch theaters. 

JSquared2
#139Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 1:17pm

VintageSnarker said: "An usher at Hillary and Clinton mentioned Slave Play would be coming in so that seemed pretty set unless they decide to switch theaters."

This was already announced a week ago.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/11/theater/slave-play-jeremy-harris-broadway.html

 

 

Dolly80
#140Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 7:26pm

A Christmas show is going to the Lyceum in November

inception Profile Photo
inception
#141Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 8:03pm

Dolly80 said: "A Christmas show is going to the Lyceum in November"

Reuben & Clay?

But seriously, I'm a bit curious about the Cique du Soleil x-mas show that will play MSG's Hulu theatre. 

Will the Stephen Sondheim be dark through the winter?  I'm guessing that the reason Beautiful is staying on through the end of October is that nothing else wants the space badly right away.


...
Updated On: 7/17/19 at 08:03 PM

MollyJeanneMusic
#142Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 8:14pm

inception said: "Dolly80 said: "A Christmas show is going to the Lyceum in November"

Reuben & Clay?

But seriously, I a bit curious about the Cique du Soleil x-mas show that will play MSG's Hulu theatre.

Will the Stephen Sondheim be dark through the winter? I'm guessing that the reason Beautiful is staying on through the end of October is that nothing else wants the space badly right away.
"

I know it's not a Shubert theatre, but I would love to see Company transfer there, or maybe that rumored revival of Assassins that always shows up on the chat boards every few months.  After all, what better to fill the Stephen Sondheim theatre than a Stephen Sondheim show?


"I think that when a movie says it was 'based on a true story,' oh, it happened - just with uglier people." - Peanut Walker, Shucked

DoTheDood Profile Photo
DoTheDood
#143Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 7/17/19 at 8:22pm

MollyJeanneMusic said: "...but I would love to see Company transfer there, or maybe that rumored revival of Assassins that always shows up on the chat boards every few months. After all, what better to fill the Stephen Sondheim theatre than a Stephen Sondheim show?"

Maybe the Doyle production happening next Spring? That's also probably wishful thinking, as I can't think of a Classic Stage Company transfer. I'm at least excited for a new Assassin's production coming back to NYC.

nemoran
#144Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 10/4/19 at 10:22pm

@Ledaero

I'm actually pretty excited about Don't Stop Til' You Get Enough coming in, and I think you all will be excited as well once you see it. From workshops, the show is really wonderful. And I HATE jukeboxes. Lynn Nottage is doing a brilliant job in constructing the narrative. It's not a typical bio-musical, and last draft I know of had it all structured within a single rehearsal for the Dangerous tour and most of it is focusing on the psychological/social/cultural issues Jackson was facing. Since the release of Leaving Neverland, they've gone deep into rewrites of how to refocus the story to be inclusive of the information presented in the documentary. And Nottage is a firm believer in the boys, so I'm sure everything will come out politically acceptable."

 

So politically acceptable means uncritically accept any and all allegations no matter who absurd, contradictory and provably false they are? Robson and Safechuck are not boys they are men. They are also proven serial liars (they repeatedly changed their stories since they decided to play the victim and claimed literally impossible things) who both only accused Jackson when they had financial problems and for 6 years they did everything they could to extort millions from Jackson's Estate. They are accusing MJJ Production of procuring kids for molestation and absolute nonsense that, notice, they did not mention in Leaving Neverland because if they had those people at MJJ Production could sue them for defamation. THey only claim this in court where their lies are protected by the litigation privilege. If this was true they would have mentioned it in the movie too. And if they are lying about that company why on earth do you think they won't lie about Michael Jackson too to get the money they want?

Their allegations are heavily based on Victor Gutierrez's sick fantasies and NAMBLA supporter pedophilia advocate whom Jackson successfully sued for defamation. Leaving Neverland has been debunked months ago but most of the media refuses to report the irrefutable evidence that their allegations cannot possibly be true.

Numerous documentaries came out to expose this fraud you can watch them on YouTube.

They will include "information" from a propaganda film but no information from the court documents which prove that film is a pack of lies?

Lies of Leaving Neverland

Leaving Neverland : Echoes of a Pedophilia Apologist

Debunking Leaving Neverland: The Gutierrez Factor

Michael Jackson And Wade Robson: The Real Story

Neverland Firsthand: Investigating the Michael Jackson Documentary

Leaving Neverland (Take Two) - Full Documentary

Michael Jackson - Chase the truth 2019 - New Documentary

Michael Jackson: Square One - Official Trailer

 

Some media had the guts to report the actual evidence that Robson Safechuck are brazen liars

 

Google "James Safechuck's Michael Jackson abuse claims 'exposed as pure fiction'"

Google "Wade Robson's Michael Jackson allegation timeline disproven by his mother "

Google "Leaving Neverland 'LIES' exposed: 'Wade Robson lied about more than Michael Jackson abuse'"

Google "Leaving Neverland shock: Director admits part of Michael Jackson abuse claim is 'WRONG'"


 Google "Leaving Neverland 'LIAR': 'These Michael Jackson claims are IMPOSSIBLE, here is the proof' "

Google "Leaving Neverland’ Director’s Attempt To Spin Reported Discrepancy Appears To Backfire"

Google "REPORT: ‘Leaving Neverland’ Discrepancy Found In Key Part Of Film Denouncing Michael Jackson"

Google "Michael Jackson accuser 'LIES': 'Wade Robson's own mother CONTRADICTED his testimony'"

Google "What You Should Know About the New Michael Jackson Documentary"

Google "Michael Jackson and why a jury would struggle to convict him of latest allegations"

Google "I don’t believe Michael Jackson’s accusers in ‘Leaving Neverland’"

Google "“Leaving Neverland” Weaves A Provocative Narrative But Is It Just One Big Lie?"

Google "Why is U.S. Media Silent on the Implosion of Leaving Neverland, While the U.K. Press is Pouncing?"

Updated On: 10/4/19 at 10:22 PM

n2nbaby Profile Photo
n2nbaby
#145Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 10/4/19 at 10:29pm

nemoran said: "@Ledaero

I'm actually pretty excited about Don't Stop Til' You Get Enough coming in, and I think you all will be excited as well once you see it. From workshops, the show is really wonderful. And I HATE jukeboxes. Lynn Nottage is doing a brilliant job in constructing the narrative. It's not a typical bio-musical, and last draft I know of had it all structured within a single rehearsal for the Dangerous tour and most of it is focusing on the psychological/social/cultural issues Jackson was facing. Since the release of Leaving Neverland, they've gone deep into rewrites of how to refocus the story to be inclusive of the information presented in the documentary. And Nottage is a firm believer in the boys, so I'm sure everything will come out politically acceptable."



So politically acceptable means uncritically accept any and all allegations no matter who absurd, contradictory and provably false they are? Robson and Safechuck are not boys they are men. They are also proven serial liars (they repeatedly changed their stories since they decided to play the victim and claimed literally impossible things) who both only accused Jackson when they had financial problems and for 6 years they did everything they could to extort millions from Jackson's Estate. They are accusing MJJ Production of procuring kids for molestation and absolute nonsense that, notice, they did not mention in Leaving Neverland because if they had those people at MJJ Production could sue them for defamation. THey only claim this in court where their lies are protected by the litigation privilege. If this was true they would have mentioned it in the movie too. And if they are lying about that company why on earth do you think they won't lie about Michael Jackson too to get the money they want?

Their allegations are heavily based on Victor Gutierrez's sick fantasies and NAMBLA supporter pedophilia advocate whom Jackson successfully sued for defamation. Leaving Neverland has been debunked months ago but most of the media refuses to report the irrefutable evidence that their allegations cannot possibly be true.

Numerous documentaries came out to expose this fraud you cant watch them on YouTube.

They will include "information" from a propaganda film but no information from the court documents which prove that film is a pack of lies?

Lies of Leaving Neverland

Leaving Neverland : Echoes of a Pedophilia Apologist

Debunking Leaving Neverland: The Gutierrez Factor

Michael Jackson And Wade Robson: The Real Story

Neverland Firsthand: Investigating the Michael Jackson Documentary

Leaving Neverland (Take Two) - Full Documentary

Michael Jackson - Chase the truth 2019 - New Documentary

Michael Jackson: Square One - Official Trailer



Some media had the guts to report the actual evidence that Robson Safechuck are brazen liars



Google "James Safechuck's Michael Jackson abuse claims 'exposed as pure fiction'"

Google "Wade Robson's Michael Jackson allegation timeline disproven by his mother "

Google "Leaving Neverland 'LIES' exposed: 'Wade Robson lied about more than Michael Jackson abuse'"

Google "Leaving Neverland shock: Director admits part of Michael Jackson abuse claim is 'WRONG'"


Google "Leaving Neverland 'LIAR': 'These Michael Jackson claims are IMPOSSIBLE, here is the proof' "

Google "Leaving Neverland’ Director’s Attempt To Spin Reported Discrepancy Appears To Backfire"

Google "REPORT: ‘Leaving Neverland’ Discrepancy Found In Key Part Of Film Denouncing Michael Jackson"

Google "Michael Jackson accuser 'LIES': 'Wade Robson's own mother CONTRADICTED his testimony'"

Google "What You Should Know About the New Michael Jackson Documentary"

Google "Michael Jackson and why a jury would struggle to convict him of latest allegations"

Google "I don’t believe Michael Jackson’s accusers in ‘Leaving Neverland’"

Google "“Leaving Neverland” Weaves A Provocative Narrative But Is It Just One Big Lie?"

Google "Why is U.S. Media Silent on the Implosion of Leaving Neverland, While the U.K. Press is Pouncing?"
"

 

If you could go back to the hole you crawled out from, that’d be great.

 

nemoran
#146Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 10/4/19 at 10:48pm

BJR said: "I find it hard to believe the Estate, which is only doing this for the cash, will allow child molestation allegations to be treated with validity in the show."

Given the amount of evidence that the allegations are bogus concocted by entitled families looking for a huge payout  it would be sheer insanity to treat them with validity.

Sondheimite Profile Photo
Sondheimite
#147Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 10/4/19 at 10:56pm

nemoran said: "@Ledaero

I'm actually pretty excited about Don't Stop Til' You Get Enough coming in, and I think you all will be excited as well once you see it. From workshops, the show is really wonderful. And I HATE jukeboxes. Lynn Nottage is doing a brilliant job in constructing the narrative. It's not a typical bio-musical, and last draft I know of had it all structured within a single rehearsal for the Dangerous tour and most of it is focusing on the psychological/social/cultural issues Jackson was facing. Since the release of Leaving Neverland, they've gone deep into rewrites of how to refocus the story to be inclusive of the information presented in the documentary. And Nottage is a firm believer in the boys, so I'm sure everything will come out politically acceptable."



So politically acceptable means uncritically accept any and all allegations no matter who absurd, contradictory and provably false they are? Robson and Safechuck are not boys they are men. They are also proven serial liars (they repeatedly changed their stories since they decided to play the victim and claimed literally impossible things) who both only accused Jackson when they had financial problems and for 6 years they did everything they could to extort millions from Jackson's Estate. They are accusing MJJ Production of procuring kids for molestation and absolute nonsense that, notice, they did not mention in Leaving Neverland because if they had those people at MJJ Production could sue them for defamation. THey only claim this in court where their lies are protected by the litigation privilege. If this was true they would have mentioned it in the movie too. And if they are lying about that company why on earth do you think they won't lie about Michael Jackson too to get the money they want?

Their allegations are heavily based on Victor Gutierrez's sick fantasies and NAMBLA supporter pedophilia advocate whom Jackson successfully sued for defamation. Leaving Neverland has been debunked months ago but most of the media refuses to report the irrefutable evidence that their allegations cannot possibly be true.

Numerous documentaries came out to expose this fraud you cant watch them on YouTube.

They will include "information" from a propaganda film but no information from the court documents which prove that film is a pack of lies?

Lies of Leaving Neverland

Leaving Neverland : Echoes of a Pedophilia Apologist

Debunking Leaving Neverland: The Gutierrez Factor

Michael Jackson And Wade Robson: The Real Story

Neverland Firsthand: Investigating the Michael Jackson Documentary

Leaving Neverland (Take Two) - Full Documentary

Michael Jackson - Chase the truth 2019 - New Documentary

Michael Jackson: Square One - Official Trailer



Some media had the guts to report the actual evidence that Robson Safechuck are brazen liars



Google "James Safechuck's Michael Jackson abuse claims 'exposed as pure fiction'"

Google "Wade Robson's Michael Jackson allegation timeline disproven by his mother "

Google "Leaving Neverland 'LIES' exposed: 'Wade Robson lied about more than Michael Jackson abuse'"

Google "Leaving Neverland shock: Director admits part of Michael Jackson abuse claim is 'WRONG'"


Google "Leaving Neverland 'LIAR': 'These Michael Jackson claims are IMPOSSIBLE, here is the proof' "

Google "Leaving Neverland’ Director’s Attempt To Spin Reported Discrepancy Appears To Backfire"

Google "REPORT: ‘Leaving Neverland’ Discrepancy Found In Key Part Of Film Denouncing Michael Jackson"

Google "Michael Jackson accuser 'LIES': 'Wade Robson's own mother CONTRADICTED his testimony'"

Google "What You Should Know About the New Michael Jackson Documentary"

Google "Michael Jackson and why a jury would struggle to convict him of latest allegations"

Google "I don’t believe Michael Jackson’s accusers in ‘Leaving Neverland’"

Google "“Leaving Neverland” Weaves A Provocative Narrative But Is It Just One Big Lie?"

Google "Why is U.S. Media Silent on the Implosion of Leaving Neverland, While the U.K. Press is Pouncing?"
"

Came out of exile to say that this is the second time I've seen pedophila defended on this site recently, as I lurk in the shadow.  Not a good look and abhorrent.  


Broadway World's Fireman.

HogansHero Profile Photo
HogansHero
#148Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 10/4/19 at 10:57pm

it is spelled with an "o"not an "a." 

nemoran
#149Opening up in dark houses
Posted: 10/4/19 at 11:16pm

n2nbaby said: " If you could go back to the hole you crawled out from, that’d be great."

Why ? Could you actually refute anything I said or you just don't like to hear what I said as it destroys what you want to believe?

Did you follow the Robson Safechuck court cases since 2013? I did. The two are the biggest frauds I have ever seen they are making a mockery of child sex abuse for financial gain.