Latest Headlines View More Articles
Latest Headlines View More Articles
Rocketman |
joined:4/14/12
joined:
4/14/12
FYI - the NY Times gave the movie a pretty good review. I am not sure I will see this movie, it does not seem like I will find out anything I really did not know about him and I have been fortunate to have seen him live three times. First time was in the 70's at MSG and the other two times were later in his career (one was with Billy Joel) in Charlotte NC. I read article that said movie is factually wrong a bunch of times when it has Elton singing songs years before they were written, that would spoil thing for me. Will be interested to see what people who see movie think about it.


joined:6/4/09
joined:
6/4/09
Spoiler Alert:
Rolling Stone notes the most glaring inconsistencies. https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/rocketman-fact-check-elton-john-biopic-842902/
I really enjoyed this film in terms of form. I think it was revelatory for the Jukebox genre and hope more creators look to it as a template - particularly in the theatre. We can do better than just splitting the titular role into three!
The acting is great, the singing is fine, I'm not a big fan of Elton and I was captive through the entire thing. I think I admired it more than loved it, but much better than Bohemian Rapsody - this has a star-making performance AND capable writing!
As a bit of an Elton John superfan, I was pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed this. The narrative musical structure worked very well and thankfully threw any sort of song chronology out the window.
It wasn't perfect obviously-- I would have liked more about the core band members and I think some lesser known songs would have fit perfectly in the story ("Ego," "Friends," "We All Fall in Love Sometimes"
But, for as much as I thought many of the details were going to be factually inaccurate, I was kinda shocked by how much it got right. No Elton didn't pick his name from John Lennon, and the relationships with Dick James and John Reid were much more complicated than that, but, compared the other music biopics, there's not much to nitpick.
I saw it last night and LOVED it. I like Elton John but I am not a big enough fan to have any inconsistencies ruin anything for me. I thought Taron Egerton was BRILLIANT and deserves an Oscar nom. The only person I wasn't a fan of was Bryce Dallas Howard (which seems to be the consensus). While I liked "Bohemian Rhapsody" I think this bio-pic is better.
I agree with most of the thoughts in this thread, and appreciated the innovative structure (for this kind of movie) - but I could not stop cringing at this lazy soap opera writing throughout, such as the family conflicts and some of the scenes with his writing partner. Maybe less innovative, but I thought Bohemian Rhapsody was executed in a much less cringeworthy way for me. Plus, Elton's music catalog doesn't quite match that of Queen's.
This film should NOT be compared to "Bohemian Rhapsody" in any way, shape or form. They tell two completely different stories about two different people. Rami Malek's performance was transformative and compelling as is Taron Egerton, but they both led different lives and had very different tribulations. Both films are very good and well made films. Taron will definitely be nominated for an Oscar next year...
I think those with historical accuracy issues should read this -
https://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a26911799/rocketman-songs-elton-john-biopic/
I saw the film yesterday and just adored pretty much every second of it. As a huge lifelong fan of his, it was kind of everything I hoped it would be.
Mike Barrett said: "Tbh, this could really excel on Broadway."
Agreed. The structure of the screenplay and the choice of songs to narrate particular moments in his life could be the foundation for a strong stage adaptation.
joined:4/14/12
joined:
4/14/12
"I think those with historical accuracy issues should read this -
https://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a26911799/rocketman-songs-elton-john-biopic/
I saw the film yesterday and just adored pretty much every second of it. As a huge lifelong fan of his, it was kind of everything I hoped it would be.
I was one of those with historical issue in the beginning but got over it and really enjoyed the movie. Taron Egerton was really good and I was impressed that he did all the singing. Bernie Taupin comes across as a really good guy as well as talented.


joined:4/22/07
joined:
4/22/07
Regarding the comments about Bryce Dallas Howard, I felt the problem was not so much the actress but the fact that hers was the only poorly-written character in the film. She seemed to take 180 degree turns from one scene to the next. Did she support her son? Was she simply enjoying his celebrity for her own selfish reasons? Was she strong in the face of cruelty by manipulative men? Was she the one doing the manipulating? I have no idea. Every scene told a different story.
To be clear, I loved the movie for the many reasons stated in this thread. I applaud their choice to tell the story with a perfect mix of truth, drama, and cinematic fantasy. I just wish the script doctors had sharpened the scenes with the mom.
Mike Barrett said: "Tbh, this could really excel on Broadway."
I am soooo sick and tired of bio jukebox musicals, but this would be my one exception because the trailers make this look campy as all hell and this would be fantastic on stage.
Considering Elton is doing the music for Devil's Wear Prada, he's clearly not afraid if being involved with Broadway. I really think we could see this one in the next 3-4 years. Could be adapted really well.









joined:6/4/09
joined:
6/4/09
Posted: 6/2/19 at 7:59am