Latest Headlines View More Articles
Latest Headlines View More Articles
GETTIN (G) THE BAND BACK TOGETHER Previews |
Full disclosure. I had a death in the family this week so maybe I was looking for a two hour escape, but I kinda liked this.
After seeing Rock Of Ages, I said to my friend, "That was a lot of fun, but my IQ just dropped 20 points." I feel the same about this.
Is it great? No. Will it run? No. It's fine for a local who paid very little, but I can't imagine anyone paying full price for this or a tourist dying to see this.
It's way too long. It should be 100 minutes with no intermission. The second act is much better than the first. The songs are mostly generic, but not awful and one is downright hilarious.
I laughed a lot, but my companion intensely disliked the first act and contemplated leaving. But, he laughed a lot in the second act and after saying "this is really bad" at intermission, decided that it was amusing but would have been much better if it had been shorter.
Maybe being a child of the 80s and spending my Summers at the Jersey Shore, I appreciated how much it was just like the Jersey Shore. The cast is very talented and seem to be having a good time.
Maybe I just needed a laugh, but the audience seemed to laugh a lot, too.
They’ve changed up a bunch of stuff since George street. I know they had Kelly Devine and replaced her as choreographer. The women in the cast were all replaced (with much younger actresses). I think they have a few new songs

joined:8/14/05
joined:
8/14/05
That kind of grossses me out a bit. Like, they changed the actresses to "hotter" actresses? Ew. Why is this hot personal trainer hung up on this boring ass, pudgy lead guy? And the choreography to me is laughably bad. I honestly don't think this show even needs choreography.
But that said, yes it should be 100 mins, and the music needs to be PUMPED up. I need to feel like I'm at a rock musical. It's all too quiet. And too much acoustic guitar.
joined:6/11/07
joined:
6/11/07
SO MUCH FREAKING FUN.
I read through the previous posts saw some mentions about her but not tons.
I’ve never had any interest in seeing this show so I’m curious is it worth seeing just for her?
joined:6/11/07
joined:
6/11/07
Her role is relatively small. If the only reason you are going is to see her, but have no interest in the rest....you would be wasting your time.
Give the show a chance.

joined:8/14/05
joined:
8/14/05
As someone who doens't know why she's famous, she actually has a great singing voice. But I felt like her acting/delivery was wonky. Maybe it will sharpen in previews, but it felt messy.
HBBrock said: "Give the show a chance."
You think people aren't trying to? While the reports follow more of a "it's so awful that I enjoyed it" trend, what's obvious is that this show isn't that great, so telling people to give it a chance is kind of a stretch!
I’d say she’s most famous for the tv shows “taxi” and “evening shade”.
Shes actually done a bunch of broadway musicals - she was Marty in the original “grease!” Broadway production (also on tour), Pal Joey, Over Here! and she was the first Roxie replacement in the still running “Chicago”. She also headlined the national tour of the 90s “Annie get your gun”
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l2i-02W61sY Sorry if it’s not clickable.
In her autobiography there large parts with broadway and tour stories. It’s actually a fun and rather trashy read - like how her and one of her “grease!” tour costar used to find places to have quickie sex during intermission.
She was also in the movie version of “Noises Off”
RippedMan said: "As someone who doens't know why she's famous, she actually has a great singing voice. But I felt like her acting/delivery was wonky. Maybe it will sharpen in previews, but it felt messy."
I’d say she’s most famous for the tv shows “taxi” and “evening shade”.
Shes actually done a bunch of broadway musicals - she was Marty in the original “grease!” Broadway production (also on tour), Pal Joey, Over Here! and she was the first Roxie replacement in the still running “Chicago”. She also headlined the national tour of the 90s “Annie get your gun”
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l2i-02W61sY Sorry if it’s not clickable.
In her autobiography there large parts with broadway and tour stories. It’s actually a fun and rather trashy read - like how her and one of her “grease!” tour costar used to find places to have quickie sex during intermission.
She was also in the movie version of “Noises Off”
RippedMan said: "As someone who doens't know why she's famous, she actually has a great singing voice. But I felt like her acting/delivery was wonky. Maybe it will sharpen in previews, but it felt messy."
joined:12/4/07
joined:
12/4/07
Solipsist234 said: "HBBrock said: "Give the show a chance."
You think people aren't trying to? While the reports follow more of a "it's so awful that I enjoyed it" trend, what's obvious is that this showisn't that great, so telling people to give it a chance is kindof a stretch!"
You really need to stop attacking people's opinions.
Yes someone that loved the show - or even liked it it a lot - SHOULD be telling people to try it. Are they supposed to throw in the towel just because some dont like it? HBB was also responding to someone that asked a question ABOUT seeing it.
If you want YOUR opinion to be valued, you have to respect others' opinions, too.
https://thewickedstage.blogspot.com/2014/11/what-happened-to-stagegrade.html
Plus that whole truly sketchy fundraising drive for Spring Awakening to perform on the Tonys.
Edit: I just dug up the thread about this. It's some good, old-fashioned BWW- a mix of industry insight and bickering. This drama had everything.
The Sketchy Spring Awakening Kickstarter
joined:12/4/07
joined:
12/4/07
And the tweet seats.
dramamama611 said: "Solipsist234 said: "HBBrock said: "Give the show a chance."
You think people aren't trying to? While the reports follow more of a "it's so awful that I enjoyed it" trend, what's obvious is that this showisn't that great, so telling people to give it a chance is kindof a stretch!"
You really need to stop attacking people's opinions.
Yes someone that loved the show - or even liked it it a lot - SHOULD be telling people to try it. Are they supposed to throw in the towel just because some dont like it? HBB was also respondingto someone that asked a question ABOUT seeing it.
If you want YOUR opinion to be valued, you have to respect others' opinions, too."
Hey, I'm just going along with the overall consensus from the few reports we've gotten from this show. Besides, it's not like anyone's opinions on this board (maybe Whizzer's) matters in the long run for this show. I mean, people were already declaring that it was DOA before playing a single performance, so what gives you the right to criticize me after reading through this entire thread and trying to get an actual idea of what this show is like? Also, some of us don't live in New York; think about that for a second!
"Stop attack people's personal opinions!" - don't know when I've done that, but hey, it's not like my opinion actually matters, so who cares!
They were restaging and introducing a new song today on their instagram story so maybe there's some choreography improvements going on

joined:7/24/15
joined:
7/24/15
This kind of cheap, bland show lowers the standard for what Broadway should be. I am the biggest advocate of fun, silly, mindless shows—but this one crosses the line from a carefree time to the actual murder of your brain cells.
Hard pass.
“This kind of cheap, bland show lowers the standard for what Broadway should be. I am the biggest advocate of fun, silly, mindless shows—but this one crosses the line from a carefree time to the actual murder of your brain cells.
Hard pass.”
How is it a hard pass if you already saw it?

joined:7/24/15
joined:
7/24/15
Jordan Catalano said: "How is it a hard pass if you already saw it?"
I meant it as a word of caution for people deciding if they should see it or not. I could say "Take a pass" or "Don't do it" if you'd prefer!

joined:8/14/05
joined:
8/14/05
I think it had a lot of potential that just wasn't realized. Why Ken Davenport felt they needed to "improv" the book doesn't make much sense. Are all those improvers getting writing credits/money from this show? Also the score is pretty awful. The opening number should be...catchy...interesting...just anything...and it's not. Poor Rando is trying, but it's just not great material. It's fun if your'e paying $40, but for an actual Broadway ticket? No way. I thought "Best Day of My Life" was probably the best song in the show. The women have the best voices in the show and yet are so underused.

joined:7/24/15
joined:
7/24/15
RippedMan said: "I think it had a lot of potential that just wasn't realized. Why Ken Davenport felt they needed to "improv" the book doesn't make much sense. Are all those improvers getting writing credits/money from this show? Also the score is pretty awful. The opening number should be...catchy...interesting...just anything...and it's not."
Head Over Heels, right next door, is a show that I think has a lot of potential that isn't being fully realized in its current form. This show, however, has an incredibly generic, predictable premise (they even made a joke in the final scene how "surprising" it must be that we've made it to that moment) matched with dull tunes and some of the laziest writing I've seen on stage. I see no potential to begin with.
joined:12/22/14
joined:
12/22/14
Posted: 7/23/18 at 10:12pm