Latest Headlines View More Articles
Latest Headlines View More Articles
M. BUTTERFLY Reviews |
This should be interesting
The Chicago Tribune seems mixed...
http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/theater/reviews/sc-ent-m-butterfly-review-1027-story.html
http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/theater/reviews/sc-ent-m-butterfly-review-1027-story.html"
“Seems” being the operative word... I didn’t follow that review at all No mention of the actors performances - good or bad?? The sets? Most bizzare.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/theater/reviews/sc-ent-m-butterfly-review-1027-story.html"
“Seems” being the operative word... I didn’t follow that review at all No mention of the actors performances - good or bad?? The sets? Most bizzare.
Matt Windman is negative...
https://www.amny.com/entertainment/m-butterfly-review-a-disastrous-broadway-revival-1.14636469
Daily Beast, Deadline and Newsday are positive
https://www.thedailybeast.com/sex-sexuality-and-spying-the-subtle-genius-of-m-butterfly-on-broadway
http://deadline.com/2017/10/clive-owen-m-butterfly-broadway-review-1202195506/
https://www.newsday.com/entertainment/theater/m-butterfly-review-1.14622484
WSJ, Daily News and Hollywood Reporter are negative
https://www.wsj.com/articles/m-butterfly-review-too-busy-to-take-flight-1509064201
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/theater-arts/julie-taymor-m-butterfly-clive-owen-lackluster-affair-article-1.3590902
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/m-butterfly-theater-review-1052046
joined:5/15/03
joined:
5/15/03


joined:7/24/15
joined:
7/24/15
His Anastasia review was a masterpiece of the genre.
BroadwayConcierge said: "Catty Brantley is always my favorite Brantley. “M. Moth.” LOL."
I despise him.
"Michael Riedel...The Perez Hilton of the New York Theatre scene"
- Craig Hepworth, What's On Stage
So Lion King was a fluke?
carnzee said: "BroadwayConcierge said: "Catty Brantley is always my favorite Brantley. “M. Moth.” LOL. "
His Anastasia review was a masterpiece of the genre."
I love the M. Moth opening sentence! I also found his Anastasia review to be quite amusing.
newintown said: ""So Lion King was a fluke?"
Only if you think it's good."
I think the first ten minutes is stunning beautiful, sadly what follows is 110 minutes of pure boring crap


joined:11/14/13
joined:
11/14/13
I love catty Brantley because even though he makes snide jokes, he brings up talking points that are still deep dives. Compared to Jesse Green, who says something is awful and then bashes it for a page.
"I think the first ten minutes is stunning beautiful, sadly what follows is 110 minutes of pure boring crap."
I agree. I think that may be what makes it so popular. There's nothing pesky, like content, to distract the audience from the colors, shapes, and movement.
I disagree with Brantley nearly completely, and think Chris Jones in the Chicago Tribune nails it.
There's little point pining for the original version, because I don't think it would play today. As Jones notes, the roles of East and West have changed and the metaphors for them in the play would seem outdated and pat. What's more, I'd argue the gender reveal would be insensitive and inappropriate today: it can't be the point of the play.
That said, the revisions do come with a price, namely the suspense of that reveal and the spell the audience falls under along with Gallimard.
And IMO Owen is underwhelming and has little stage presence and Ha is wonderful (hence why I completely disagree with Brantley.) And I found the physical production to be beautiful and expressive but had trouble giving clarity to the new complexities of the script.


joined:6/15/14
joined:
6/15/14
There is nothing wrong with a couple hours of "colors, shapes, and movement." The problem is one of genre; in the theatre we expect all of those things to be in the service of storytelling.








joined:6/21/06
joined:
6/21/06
Posted: 10/26/17 at 11:05am