"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle
I love Riedel, but his blatant ass-kissing of certain people is disgusting. Stephen Daldry is the best director working in theater today? Really? Also I see he's back on the Stro bandwagon.
As for Dumbo as a musical...I don't see how it will work without being corny. I'd love to be proven wrong, though.
"Last week, writing about the upcoming revival of 'Evita,' I asked readers to e-mail me their 'dream Che.' (The producers are out to get Ricky Martin, but he hasn't accepted yet.) The results are in, and the winner, although he's getting a little long in the diente for the part, is Antonio Banderas.
A close runner-up is Raul Esparza, followed by Hugh Jackman (Aussie Che), Cheyenne Jackson (Gay Che) and Justin Timberlake (Tacky Che)."
What a douche.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
I can see it now. A bunch of actors running around a stage with trunks hanging off the top of their heads. And naturally, Timothy the mouse will be exactly the same size as the elephants. The whole idea is pretty ridiculous. Every single thing does not have to be a musical. Didn't they learn their lesson from The Little Mermaid?
Also, at today's ticket prices of about $135.00 each, it would cost a family of four $540.00 just to see the show, and of course, at the rates prices are rising, by the time this thing gets developed and on the boards, top ticket prices will probably be around $200 each.
I don't see how this could be successful. If they want to do a Dumbo musical, they should do it at one of their theme parks.
I definitely see this more as a theme park show than a real Broadway production. And I'm sorry, but why are they doing this before any number of more viable alternatives? Um, Aladdin anyone? And maybe I'm extremely alone in this, but I'd much rather see a stage production of Pocahontas before Dumbo.
There are some people in the world who say that writing stories, or composing music or dancing sparkly dances is easy for them. Nothing interferes with their ability to create. While I celebrate their creative freedom, a little part of me just wants to punch those motherf*ckers in the teeth...[tos]
Butters, go buy World of Warcraft, install it on your computer, and join the online sensation before we all murder you.
--Cartman: South Park
ATTENTION FANS: I will be played by James Barbour in the upcoming musical, "BroadwayWorld: The Musical."
Why don't they just either put Holes off-Broadway (there is a play version available, which Disney Theatricals could probably buy out the Susan Schulzman Agency who owns it very easily), or try Bedknobs and Broomsticks? I know there's not much commercial appeal in the ladder, nor is the score/book amazing...but I think it could be done. Starting in the West End, transferring to Broadway...?
Hell, they already HAVE the rights to Mulan as a stage version. That would last longer. Or maybe The Emperors New Groove? I could see that one working.
But Dumbo? If we want a protagonist as an elephant, why don't we just revive Seussical?
On the note of revivals, Evita revival? Yuckkk.
Recent Broadway and Off-Broadway:: Carrie, Merrily, Ionescopade
Next On The List :: Clybourne Park, Once, Streetcar, BOM
Dumbo is nowhere near one of my favorites of the Disney animated feature films (I often forget it exists), but I wouldn't write it off, conceptually. I remember when Lion King was announced and there was so much laughing about how it would be just actors in animal suits like the theme parks. But Disney will have to get a new creative director to oversee the project with a bit more objectivity so we don't have another Tarzan or Little Mermaid.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
I agree that Aladdin is a much more viable option for a musical. Why they haven't continued to develop that (beyond the 40 minute show at California Adventure, which is closing this summer, by the way, to make room for Toy Story) is beyond me.
What a s#!!ty thing to say. There may be gay men who have trouble playing convincing straight-men on stage, but Cheyenne certainly isn't one of them. Why make a weak joke that exacerbates the notion that offstage sexuality affects onstage performance. Thanks for being a part of the problem, Michael.
That said, I don't know how you do another show about animals onstage without it feeling like a Lion King retread. And I really don't see the point of Disney launching anything on Broadway until they fix the internal politics of having 30 executives giving an endless stream of conflicting and sabotaging notes until all the edges of a piece are filed down to a homogenized blandness.
If the audience could do better, they'd be up here on stage and I'd be out there watching them. - Ethel Merman