With "La Cage.." posting their ticket prices, it is now clear that $132.50 is the NORM for a Broadway musical. I was never one to get on the "Broadway is too expensive" bandwagon, but this has put me over the edge. And, don't even get me started on the "holiday week" pricing. The lovely "Finian's" and "Ragtime" would have met a better fate with tickets even $15.00 less.
It's taught in business that businesses don't set the price of products, consumers do.
"If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn't help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition and then admit that we just don't want to do it." -Stephen Colbert
I am so f*cking sick of this song. If you think it's too much don't pay it. I cannot remember the last time I paid top price for a Theater ticket. I shop discounts, I sit in the back. I buy half price tickets the day of the show.
I wish ANY other item I purchased had so many chances for me to save.
Pricing is getting out of hand. Exactly 32 years ago today I saw my first Broadway musical. I still have the ticket stub - $15 for a front mezzanine ticket. Just two years later, I paid $30 to see Evita.
Hey Dottie!
Did your colleagues enjoy the cake even though your cat decided to sit on it? ~GuyfromGermany
Same thing with rent prices in Manhattan. I can't afford the going rate, but REALLY want to live there, so there should be special pricing for me. Same with those gorgeous flat screen tv's you hang on your wall. I WANT one, but they keep charging these ridiculous prices. HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO AFFORD THAT?
You mark my words: Broadway, Televisions, and Manhattan real estate are going to die soon because they charge WAY too much. They're all hurting those who love them the most.
If the audience could do better, they'd be up here on stage and I'd be out there watching them. - Ethel Merman
I don't know about the death of Manhattan, but does anyone really want to pay that much to see LA CAGE AUX FOLLES? I mean, if it was a full-out production of FOLLIES, or A LITTLE NIGHT MUSIC with a full orchestra, or something, but, really now, another revival of LA CAGE?
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers." Thomas Pynchon, GRAVITY'S RAINBOW
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Philip K. Dick
My blog: http://www.roscoewrites.blogspot.com/
I repeat what I said in the other thread. You people do not pay full price anyway. What do you pay, rush, student discount, lotto? You pay very little if anything. You have no right complaining.
There where only THREE times I have payed full price.
The Original Cast of RAGTIME. The Original Cast of WICKED
and Linda Eder's Christmas Concert on Broadway right after 9-11
"Whenever I get gloomy with the state of the world, I think about the arrivals gate at Heathrow Airport. General opinion's starting to make out that we live in a world of hatred and greed, but I don't see that. It seems to me that love is everywhere. Often it's not particularly dignified or newsworthy, but it's always there - fathers and sons, mothers and daughters, husbands and wives, boyfriends, girlfriends, old friends. When the planes hit the Twin Towers, as far as I know none of the phone calls from the people on board were messages of hate or revenge - they were all messages of love. If you look for it, I've got a sneaky feeling you'll find that love actually is all around."
It isn't a question of if prices are to high. It isn't even a question of if people will pay $130 to see La Cage. The issue is people thinking that Broadway is anything other than a business operating in a free market.
If people don't want to pay $130 to see La Cage, it will close. Plenty of people want to pay $130 and up to see Wicked so they do. So when the original poster uses a phrase like "too expensive," it is completely meaningless in any context other than just for them. And obviously, the price of tickets for an industry shouldn't be set by what a poster named lynnetoomey on BWW can afford.
Great shows sell at high prices. Bad shows try to sell at lower prices if they can. I've just never understood the argument I hear frequently applied to our industry that it should be "accessible." If you used that argument for consumer goods, you would be laughed at by your friends, but it's an argument that persists on these boards.
If the audience could do better, they'd be up here on stage and I'd be out there watching them. - Ethel Merman
I know people do not believe NIGHT MUSIC is worth $137. I don't feel it should be priced that high either. But most audiences seem to be paying that price for the two stars. I just don't think Grammer is going to be able to sell tickets on the same level as Zeta-Jones and Lansbury. But I wish the production the best!
You can get a great flat screen for a hell of a lot less than you could even a year ago this time. Plus you can shop for open box items to save even more.
The problem with Broadway ticket prices is that producers feel every show they put on is going to sell out and be the next WICKED so they need to charge as much as they can so they can make as much as they can. You'd think by now they'd learn that it's a fluke and their choice to do this only backfires on them and bites them in the ass.
With a show like RAGTIME, I guarantee that if they charged $35 for every seat in the house it would still be running and the houses would be full. More people go to see something if they can afford it obviously, but more importantly more people are willing to take a risk on something they're not sure about if it's affordable. $132 per person is a ridiculous amount of money to ask someone to spend for 2 hours of their time on something they don't really know anything about.
I really get aggravated now when people say "Oh well there's discounts and TKTS!" Those used to be wonderful and I used to take full advantage of them. I could spend $20 at TKTS and see a show and that was only about 10 years ago. Now the cost there is around $70 per ticket. Which is STILL a ridiculous amount of money to ask people to pay on something they don't know about and obviously even casting movie stars in a show isn't a guarantee people will pay it.
It really hits home when you have something wonderful like NEXT FALL that by just looking at it on paper right now doesn't stand a chance. I hope to God I'm wrong about this but there are no "names". Ticket prices at their cheapest at TKTS would be $70. This does nothing but a disservice to the show, the cast and everyone involved in it. And it's a real shame.
As for LA CAGE, ain't no way in hell Kelsey Grammer is going to sell out that theater. Maybe 10 years ago (and that's a big maybe) but today? Nuh Uh.
Brian you are so right. and yes, a large number of posters on this board do not understand the business of show, as much as they like to think they do.
^Jordan, I remember when I saw my first show 14 years ago, the top full-price ticket was $70! And now that's what you spend at TKTS? Ridiculous! But if people are willing to pay, by all means let them pay 132.50 or more! The more people who pay more money, the longer a show can run and the longer people can be employed. We should be happy that people can pay that much, and thank goodness for rush and SRO!
Brian, I think I did get your point. It wasn't hard to miss.
I was just wondering if there was anyone, really anyone, who'd want to shell out that much to see that tired old show.
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers." Thomas Pynchon, GRAVITY'S RAINBOW
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Philip K. Dick
My blog: http://www.roscoewrites.blogspot.com/
I remember getting upset in the early 70's when tickets hit $10......
And as for Jordan Catalano's comment "....$132 per person is a ridiculous amount of money to ask someone to spend for 2 hours of their time...." : people pay more than that all the time - ask the pricey call girls and rent boys!
2016 These Paper Bullets (1/02) Our Mother's Brief Affair (1/06), Dragon Boat Racing (1/08), Howard - reading (1/28), Shear Madness (2/10), Fun Home (2/17), Women Without Men (2/18), Trip Of Love (2/21), The First Gentleman -reading (2/22), Southern Comfort (2/23), The Robber Bridegroom (2/24), She Loves Me (3/11), Shuffle Along (4/12), Shear Madness (4/14), Dear Evan Hansen (4/16), American Psycho (4/23), Tuck Everlasting (5/10), Indian Summer (5/15), Peer Gynt (5/18), Broadway's Rising Stars (7/11), Trip of Love (7/27), CATS (7/31), The Layover (8/17), An Act Of God (8/31), The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time (8/24), Heisenberg (10/12), Fiddler On The Roof (11/02), Othello (11/23), Dear Evan Hansen (11/26), Les Liaisons Dangereuses (12/21) 2017 In Transit (2/01), Groundhog Day (4/04), Ring Twice For Miranda (4/07), Church And State (4/10), The Lucky One (4/19), Ernest Shackleton Loves Me (5/16), Building The Wall (5/19), Indecent (6/01), Six Degrees of Separation (6/09), Marvin's Room (6/28), A Doll's House Pt 2 (7/25) Curvy Widow (8/01)
"With a show like RAGTIME, I guarantee that if they charged $35 for every seat in the house it would still be running and the houses would be full. "
I would like to disagree. If a show like Ragtime had a top ticket price of $35 and all the other Broadway houses had their normal pricing, the general tourist theatre goer would believe something is wrong with Ragtime for being so cheap. Yes tickets are expensive and yes people will continue paying the high prices. It does not necessarily mean the shows are better but the consumer will think they are getting better theatre with the higher price. It becomes a status symbol.
Those Blocked: SueStorm. N2N Nate. Good riddence to stupid! Rad-Z, shill begone!
It is like when Disneyland raised the price to park a car to $14.00. I was outraged, but I bought a parking pass which has now payed for itself.
"I never had theatre producers run after me. Some people want to make more Broadway shows out of movies. But Elliot and I aren't going to do Batman: The Musical." - Julie Taymor 1999