SING STREET @ NYTW

[CarmenA3]

Meet (most) of the Cast:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/12/11/theater/sing-street-cast.amp.html

 

[CarmenA3]

macny: 

 

Click Here To Toggle Spoiler Content

I thought the same about Brendan being inside the house - it can't be very comfortable!

Now that you mention it, I too felt that the first band practice "disharmony" is more obvious - great update IMO. 

 

[Kad]

DoTheDood said: "CarmenA3 said: "Has a show ever announced a Broadway run before even ending their off-Bway run?"

The only exception I can find is Hamilton, but honestly nothing can beat that original Hamiltonhype obviously so we might not find out for Sing Street at least until the run is over.

Edit: More have as I've looked into it. Shows like Dear Evan Hansen, Fun Home, and Be More Chill did, but only near the end of their off-B'way run (probably at least until the off-B'way run was sold out)."

Another hit musical that originated at NYTW announced a Broadway transfer on its opening night and went on to be a hit: Once. 

[jonah3500]

CarmenA3 said: "macny:

 

Click Here To Toggle Spoiler Content

I thought the same about Brendan being inside the house - it can't be very comfortable!

Now that you mention it, I too felt that the first band practice "disharmony" is more obvious - great update IMO.

"

Actually if you look closely, it seems like there is no back to the house, making it a bit more comfy.

[Robbie2]

[CarmenA3]

jonah3500: Oh, yes, it's definitely backless, but still can't be comfortable to sit in that position for 30mins+ on a hard table. 

[CarmenA3]

Unexpected return to the show as it heads into press weekend for Monday's Opening.  A few things I noticed tonight:

-Conor has a new beanie for the opening scene, it's black/dark blue. I loved the tan one (I knit/crochet and it really caught my eye LOL)

-When the school crest is projected onto the screen background, it now has a 3-d/shadow effect. I like it, much better than the flat 2D look before.

-The curtain call has changed. Tonight they come out and stood in three rows from downstage to back, with Conor, Raphina, Brendan and someone else (blocked view) in the front row. They bow, criss-cross, bow again, and then take a bow as one line. Really liked it!

 

Click Here To Toggle Spoiler Content

-In the bathroom scene with Brother Baxter, the sponge is now in a holder and has some foam (I hope it's bubble gum flavored and not real soap!). When he wipes Conor's face, his face gets the foam. In a previous show, the sponge had fallen on the floor as the sink was being moved in, so Brother Baxter ended up wiping Conor's face with just his hand!

I didn't notice any story/plot changes and today was their final rehearsal per Zara's IG. There were press folks at the show tonight. Happy Opening to them on Monday!

[nicolep76]

Opening is tonight! Any guesses how this will fare with critics?

[CarmenA3]

nicolep76 said: "Opening is tonight! Any guesses how this will fare with critics?"

Excited for the cast and crew! I hope they're all positive, but one thing that will be (or should be) mentioned is the projections. To me, they didn't add much of anything except emphasize that we're on an island, and yes, a metaphor for being stuck, I understand, but could have easily gone without.

I expect mixed reviews - personally I love the show - but I can see where a critic could pick at things. Fingers crossed! 

[CoffeeBreak]

https://observer.com/2019/12/sing-street-musical-review-john-carney-80s-movie-loses-its-edge/

[nicolep76]

Interested to see how the rest of the reviews pan out....I don’t typically agree with David Cote’s reviews in general so was not surprised he basically hated it. I really enjoyed the show and am a fan of the movie but agree some things still need to be tweaked and refined for a Broadway run.

[raddersons]

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/16/theater/sing-street-review-off-broadway.html Times is mixed

https://www.vulture.com/2019/12/review-of-sing-street-at-new-york-theatre-workshop.html Vulture is mostly positive

[JBroadway]

I'm sad, but not especially surprised about the tepid reviews for this. 

And while I loved this show and I'm rooting for it, I'll say the same thing I said when Wrong Man reviews came out; for shows like Sing Street, Wrong Man, Secret Life of Bees, etc. reviews are very important to garnering the momentum to justify a transfer. So when people start predicting Broadway transfers for these shows right out of the gate, before we find out if the show is well-received by critics, it's really jumping the gun. Just because a show looks like Transfer-Bait on paper, and just because Michael Riedel says they want it to transfer, doesn't mean it'll happen. 

I hope these reviews don't prevent a Broadway transfer (and I guess they won't, if the Lyceum rumor is true - though I remain skeptical). But it can't help their chances. 

It's a real shame, because I really enjoyed - even loved - all 3 of the shows I named above. 

[VotePeron]

JBroadway said: "I'm sad, but not especially surprised about the tepid reviews for this.

And while I loved this show and I'm rooting for it, I'll say the same thing I said when Wrong Man reviews came out;for shows like Sing Street, Wrong Man, Secret Life of Bees, etc. reviews are very important to garnering the momentum to justify a transfer. So when people start predicting Broadway transfers for these shows right out of the gate, before we find out if the show is well-received by critics, it's really jumping the gun. Just because a show looks like Transfer-Bait on paper, and just because Michael Riedel says they want it to transfer, doesn't mean it'll happen.

I hope these reviews don't preventa Broadway transfer (and Iguess they won't, if the Lyceum rumor istrue - though I remain skeptical). But it can't help their chances.

It's a real shame, because I really enjoyed - even loved - all 3 of the shows I named above."

I appreciate the sentiment, but with the specific case of Sing Street, the transfer wasn’t a prediction on the boards behalf. It’s based off information from multiple sources involved with the production, and has been in the works since before previews began. Whether or not it happens now won’t be because it never was going to - it was, and has a theater reserved - but a matter of momentum. The run is still very well sold and word of mouth is stellar. Definitely will be interested to see how it plays out. 

[JBroadway]

Sorry if I was unclear - but I'm not just talking about predictions from the board. I'm saying that even if the production truly does intend to transfer, and has intended to transfer since day 1, their plans still could potentially be derailed by tepid reviews, if investors lose faith in it. Plus it slows the show's "momentum," to use your word. 

And I admit that if they really do have the Lyceum booked, then yeah, the reviews probably won't effect them much. Unless some key investors REALLY freak out and jump ship. But if they've already gone with the show this far, I'd be surprised if they don't see it through, especially since, as you pointed out, the reviews and word-of-mouth are far from disastrous. My skepticism on this point is mainly about whether or not the Lyceum rumor is actually true. Sure, some people on this board have been saying it with absolute, utter certainty. But at the end of the day, I'm inclined to wait until the official press release before I fully believe anything. 

[Wayman_Wong]

The Guardian: 'Sing Street' heads to stage with something missing

https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2019/dec/16/sing-street-review-new-york-theatre-workshop

[ACL2006]

Does this still go straight to Broadway in the Spring, or should they hold off and tweak the show and aim for next season?

[Daddy Warbucks]

Does this create the most ideal situation for the Shuberts, Sing Street and Beetlejuice? Shuberts have a good reason to tell Sing Street to hold off. Sing Street comes back next season retooled and is a legit contender for Best Musical. Shuberts capture political capital by helping Beetlejuice move into the Lyceum.

[JBroadway]

Daddy Warbucks said: "Does this create the most ideal situation for the Shuberts, Sing Street and Beetlejuice? Shuberts have a good reason to tell Sing Street to hold off. Sing Street comes back next season retooled and is a legit contender for Best Musical. Shuberts capture political capital by helping Beetlejuice move into the Lyceum. "
 

It’s just that Beetlejuice probably wouldn’t fit into the Lyceum. 

 

[wolfwriter]

The so-so reviews don’t surprise me. It seems, they didn’t work on anything substantive, during previews.

They should wait and work on it, but, if rumors are true and the papers are signed, it might transfer, as is.

That would be a shame. It has potential and they put an okay first draft on stage, but they need a different book writer or a different book and then go from there.

It seems like they want to rush a mediocre show to Broadway, rather than eventually move a great show to Broadway.

[ErmengardeStopSniveling]

Beetlejuice would have to be entirely reworked for the Lyceum. 950 seats is just so small for a musical to make its nut. Part of BJ's success has been its ability to sell a lot of moderately-priced tickets, because the Winter Garden is so big. At a tiny venue like the Lyceum, it would be relying much more heavily on premiums and full-priced tix.

Over the next few months, when every new venue becomes available, people will say "well what if Beetlejuice moved there!" when in reality most have been spoken for already (with backups) or wouldn't justify a $4 mil overhaul. A scale-down probably also means cutting 6-12 people from the 26-person cast, in addition to re-designing and re-orchestrating...which could irritate the fans. I don't think there will be any winning with a scaled-down BJ.

Sing Street would be smart to delay its move.

[SouthernCakes]

Sounds like they tried to strike gold twice with the same Once layout but didn’t work. I didn’t realize it wasn’t John Tiffany directing.

[Ado Annie D'Ysquith]

Re: SouthernCakes

I like Rebecca Taichman's body of work, but has she ever directed a musical before? Could that play into what you're implying?