Latest Headlines View More Articles
Latest Headlines View More Articles
Douglas Sills & Alexandra Socha To Lead Encores’ MACK AND MABEL? |
joined:10/11/11
joined:
10/11/11
I need to underline as someone who's done this show,
this is one of the WORST books of any musical. Truly.
The dialogue is awful. Like stunningly stilted and eyerolling.
It's just dull. The story is not engaging cause it's essentially a biopic.
I don't think there is saving it. What would a rewrite do? Better dialogue maybe, but it's still gonna be this plodding episodic thing.
There is not one engaging character. Mack is a sexist piece of **** and you're stuck with him the whole show.
It should always just be performed as a concert.
Also as a note, Samuel French doesn't give you a bound script. They give you a WORKING SCRIPT. There is no official libretto, like Michael Stewart threw up his hands and just said "whatever"
rattleNwoolypenguin said: "
Also as a note, Samuel French doesn't give you a bound script. They give you a WORKING SCRIPT. There is no official libretto, like Michael Stewart threw up his hands and just said "whatever""
That's weird, because I have the usual, published edition of M&M from Samuel French back in the late 1970s. I don't recall if it qualifies it as a "working script".
As I said above, Michael Stewart threw his opening night tix at me and said something about going back to France. (I don't mean to suggest he was unkind to me; he was just very upset with Ron Link's revisions and probably didn't mean to throw tickets AT me.) I think that's as close to "whatever" as you're likely to get.
A successful M&M is possible, IMHO, but would have to find a way to stretch the romantic tension through Act II. Maybe forget historical fact and invent additional romantic obstacles. Make Mack the person Mabel runs to during her later struggles with scandal, drugs and artistic failures.
As for this business of Mack Sennett being such an unlikeable character, I don't understand it at all. Yeah, he's gruff, but no more so than Henry Higgins, Billy Bigelow, or Georges Seurat. What's interesting is how his unacknowledged love for Mabel softens him a little and makes him more than just a tyrannical director. Keep THAT theme going through Act II and you'd have a chance at a successful show, even with the sad ending of Mabel's death.
Charley Kringas Inc said: "Because the book sorta sucks. Great tunes, but you’re never given much of a reason to pay attention to either of these increasingly crabby people as they swirl the drain. I like the concept but it really needs a firecracker rewrite to truly sell the disparity between the jubilant score and the agony of the plot."
Just passing along a little rumor...


joined:6/10/12
joined:
6/10/12
Posted: 7/10/19 at 9:53pm