I was there tonight (Saturday) as well. Of course KK is a genius creation and I felt that the set design and underscoring were really quite appropriate and exciting but as everyone has said the book and score were by turns adequate to atrocious. After three passes of creatives they settled for this mediocrity? I was most angry about the final moments.
After a couple of hiccups I just got my order of The Waverly Gallery through the gauntlet to an actual purchase. Im not sure that they ever needed to update their site but I gather that it's designed to work better for them on the backend which would be a credible reason for the upgrade. It sure doesn't bring anything new to the table for the costumer. I'm willing to give them some slack for another week or so to work the kinks out. It's a great organization that through the y
VotePeron said: "nycward said: "Saw this last night and although there is much to admire I found the 31/4 hour sit in the mezz ofthe Jacobs a bit of a chore.I kept on thinking that crossing over to union overtime seemed unnecessary for this production."
As the show ends before 11pm (all evening curtains are 7pm, ending at 10:15pm), there is no union overtime incurred, correct?
I believe that the union rules about overtime extend past three hou
Saw this last night and although there is much to admire I found the 31/4 hour sit in the mezz of the Jacobs a bit of a chore. I kept on thinking that crossing over to union overtime seemed unnecessary for this production. Yes there is much to admire but it is indeed over baked and it could have benefited by cutting 20 minutes from the show. Certainly to reduce the running costs by many thousand of dollars per week. God bless TDF though. $45 per ticket makes it all so much better co
actually since the theatre needs renovation I'm gonna guess that they will rip the **** out of the stage and orchestra to accommodate the production. A theatre in a bit of disrepair might just make the production a bit "site specific." Just my guess as to why they are taking this theatre for the run an not a larger one.
I'm sure that TV ratings are motivating this. Also, keep in mind that Hamilton is selling out in DC at the Opera House where the awards are being televised. It will be inexpensive to get the cast onstage to pull this off.
Sidebar here: I often hear that older people get upset that Doris Day who is now 96 has never received this honor. The truth is that she has been asked countless times over the past 25 years but she refuses to show up for the telecast. The sam
I found BS's (no editorial meant:) letter to be rather meaningful. I am a Stage Director who spent 20 years in the business with 60 Equity contracts to my credit who left to get his MSW and has since had a meaningful 20 year career as a Psychotherapist here in New York. I believe that second acts can be restorative and worth the work if we no longer find the joy in our current profession. I remember getting some guidance from AEA Actor's Work Program. The big gift I received from
Yes, like everyone else on this thread I extoll the praises of this production. After first seeing it I had a bit of trouble adapting the themes from depression era rural Spain to contemporary urban London, but with time I left realism behind and just appreciated the journey through obsession, compulsion and the ultimate collision of these two Id driven urges. (Yes, I am a Psychoshrinkacologist and former Stage Director) I really want to give a shout out to TDF. Everyone on this boa
I saw this show last evening and on the whole had a good time. I'm a Baby Boomer with only a distant memory of this film but a diehard millennial who loved the film accompanied me. It obviously played to its base audience and they went ballistic. The theatre was filled with adorable young women and gay boys all on a high. The production moved like clockwork and was well acted and written. Yes, the score feels a bit generic and repetitive but all production elements are firing on all cylin
The Loge is further away from the stage than the standard Mezzanine. I got tickets in the 100 section of the orchestra row G. I would prefer side orchestra first 10 rows to anywhere in the Loge. Decide if the full on perfect stage view is more important than being closer on a side angle. That should be your determining factor to consider.
The Lyric is now owned by the Ambassador group from London. Sonia Freidman has had a long relationship with them. Major concessions were made between them so this was a better arrangement for all parties. They are settling in for a looooooong run.
GeorgeandDot said: "Angels in America would suck if it were cut down to three hours."
It would suck if the playwright found a way to cut 30 minutes from part one and 45 minutes from part two? I have more confidence in Mr. Kushner's talents than to dismiss the task of careful pruning his opus. I'm just wondering what it would look like if he undertook that task.
I saw this production on the previous two Sundays via TDF. I found the cast to be extraordinary and the direction helped elevate the evening. I did find the physical production to be rather dark and unappealing but the quality of the work got me passed it. I always describe this play as a big, sprawling, fabulous mess. Seeing this reminds me of George S. Kaufman's famous adage that "nothing in life should be greater than two hours!" The writing is so good but I often wonder what
My Sunday at 6 seats are row K mezzanine. The house looked pretty full so I suspect that these performances offered less desirable seats than did the first and second preview tix.
considering Ms. Metcalf's Awards season buzz I'm not sure why they wouldn't wait till the following week to begin previews. What was the rush? Seems strange.
At Sunday's performance the ending was quite thrilling. There were sound effects during the blackout and the reveal of the Angel was quite striking. I think one needs to have a little patience during early previews. I'm sure the denouement of the first play will tighten with time.
I'm more concerned about the repetition of the three turntables of unattractive rooms during the first two acts, but I suspect that the staging of the second part will justifying the transition fr
theaterguy11 said: "I actually know quite a bit about the real Roy Cohn. I first saw Angels in America during the 03 HBO miniseries. The portrayal and the writing was so mean spirited and over the top that I looked into him to try and get a realistic view of him. I was left thinking that he was one of the greatest Americans of all time. A true believer that a small federal government was the best way for all Americans to prosper.I hope someday the Kushner estate is forced to pay dama
theaterguy11 said: "I cannot believe people like this play so much. I have always found it vapid, overly long, occasionally slanderous and downright mean spirited. It's shameful the way Kushner wrote the Roy Cohn character.
Cohn passionately believed in his politics as passionately as Kushner believes in his. Kushner makes no attempt to write Roy as anything other than a cartoon villain who's actively trying to ruin the world.
I just saw it on Amazon digital downloads for $8.99. I usually get my music on there cause its always cheaper than iTunes and they have many cast recordings to listen to for free with Amazon Prime. Check it out.
