Hello all, if you've been following this thread, you know that it has devolved into quite a bit of a mess over the past 12 hours. As some of you have noted, we have deleted all of the posts from that period that were not about the topic at hand, but were instead focused on arguing with a particularly antagonistic poster. While we would rather not delete that many posts, it had take the thread so far afield from the topic at hand, we felt it necessary.
We know our boards have the best detectives in the biz, so if you think you've got all the answers, you can enter to win our contest for tix to the next show at Paper Mill!
Hi all, while there is likely zero chance that "Dear Evan Hansen" will close any time soon, we don't see any reason to close the thread just yet. From our perspective, and as others have politely pointed out, the OP's question probably comes from at least a nugget of contractual truth, even if the likelihood of it happening is practically nonexistent.
As other posters continue to share insight as to explain how contracts, closings, etc. work, we think that there
goldenstate5, since you asked publicly, your message was not edited for the use of the word "jeeeeez," it was edited because of the personal insult that followed it about posters who had been vocal with their dislike of the show. We thought that since the remainder of your message did not violate the board's rules that this was a better option than deleting the entire post. I hope that clears up the confusion.
By the way, "jeeeeez" is a perfectly acceptable word
Mar 9
2019, 05:31:35 PM
Not sure what the issue was, but we cleared the cache on that part of the site, and it looks to be back to normal. Thanks for the heads up!
Thank you for your thoughts on the topic to all who have posted in this thread this morning. As we always have, we support and welcome everybody to review, comment on, and discuss shows, movies, songs, and performers' onstage work as long as those comments do not cross any lines into personal attacks, including statements that are demonstrably inaccurate for the purpose of negatively commenting on an individual.
As we have said in the past, discussing a performer's attendance is completely acceptable on the board, as it certainly serves the purpose of informing other theatregoers of important information. Obviously that will elicit a myriad of feelings from different people, and that is fine as well.
Where the problems come is when people without published or verifiable information start making statements as that the performer is purposely using health (m
Ok all, please return the conversation to the topic at hand, rather than the personal in-fighting. We would hate to have to lock the thread because the discussion devolved to bickering. Thank you so much.
Ok all, we are getting wildly far afield from the topic at hand, so we ask that you please dispense with the unnecessary personal entanglements, and get back to the "Alice By Heart" conversation. If that proves to not be possible, we will unfortunately have to lock the thread, as it will indicate to us that the discussion has reached its natural ending point. Thank you so much, and have a good day.
Ok, everybody. I think that it's time to get the conversation back on track. There's no need to bicker amongst ourselves. If that is the line of conversation that this thread continues to take, we will assume that the discussion has run its natural course, and we will lock the thread. Hopefully that won't be necessary.
A number of posts here have violated our rules on personal attacks, and as such we are going to lock overnight as it’s just impossible for us to monitor 24/7 - happy to open back up again in the AM and continue the discussion in a productive manner.
Please remember personal attacks are against our rules and are grounds for suspensions for repeat offenders.
Thank you, and we appreciate your cooperation. Our apologizes to everyone who was keeping this thread on
EDIT: Can whoever runs this app PLEASE fix the problems with typing on here? Every time I make a comment, itdeletes all my quotation marks and apostrophes right before posting, and it’s a bit annoying to have to go back and edit each time."
Thanks for letting us know, our programmer looked into it, and think they have gotten it fixed. If you run into the issue again, please feel free to email us at moderator[at]broadwayworld[
Alright, everybody, I think that this conversation has run it's course, and everyone has had their opinion heard. For the most part, it was civil (while still heated), and we only had to remove a couple of posts that crossed the line. For that, we are grateful!
To the OP, whether you feel that you took anything from the arguments that you had with other posters, I think that there were a number of earnest posters who game you their opinions that hopefully you found helpful.&n
Hi all, first, we want to thank you for keeping this discussion civil, despite it being pretty spirited. However, this thread is supposed to be about "A Star is Born," and it not winning at last night's Golden Globes. While the conversation of Lady Gaga (and other artists) and R. Kelly did arise organically, it's probably better to steer the discussion back to the film and the awards.
If you would like to continue this discussion in one form or another, it
Hi all - we'd appreciate if we could keep this discussion civil and about the show itself.
MassiveMeGo, all our users are entitled to their opinions on the quality of the show, and while you're free to share yours, replying to each repeatedly may not be the most productive way to do so.
_(•_&bull_/ said: "Patti Murin has discussed her Anexity in blog posts and national news have picked up on it.
We were never given the option to discuss it. The threads were deleted rather quickly. Even though, rude comments were said, they never happened that early as the threadw vaniashed very fast.
Why is it, that you said we can not discuss mental health, but with michelle we are al
_/ said: "Patti Murin has discussed her Anexity in blog posts and national news have picked up on it.
