GreasedLightning said: " I know. To be fair, I just read some more of his tweets and it seems he had his Exhibition show in Brooklyn today in between parts... but Istill feel“ugh” about the poor scheduling."
Oh wait THIS is why today's 4pm Black Exhibition started at just after 4:55pm? (No, that is not a typo; started just shy of an hour late.)
Glittergrrl said: "jbird5 said: "If you have a strong stomach, you could go see Our Dear Dead Drug Lord. I think it crosses the line into being sensational just for the sake of being “edgy”, but most critics - except Sarah Holdren and a few others - disagree."
Could someone please tell me in spoiler text, if there is any animal abuse? I’m kind of sensitive to animal stuff-particularly dog stuff. I want to see this, but I need to prepare
so for Erika Henningsen you want the 12noon - 12:50 hour, and you can get autographs from her and everyone else who is listed in that 12noon - 12:50 slot for your $35 donation.
So is the WSS Instagram account going to just leave their comments turned off forever, so that no one can comment about their casting on any of their posts? Feels like a&
yankeefan7 said: " I would love to see some show say nobody is doing the stage door and see the reaction."
I'm too lazy to Google it right now, but isn't this what happened with that play that Amy Schumer did, that some (all?) of the actors announced on social media before it even started that they would not be doing the stage door for the entire run of the play?
I didn't read that he was expecting (or that he got) the show to reimburse him for traveling to Philly to get his haircut? Just that he finally got the ok to not have to use the show's hair person, after two failed show hair people, and was allowed to do it with his own person when he was in Philly.
Mediamaven2 said: " It's not like the dancers uncomfortable with this haven't been heard or have any reason to fear repercussions. "
The women dancers here have been told here by their union that their union will fight for Ramasar's right to decimate nude photos of them without their consent, etc., versus their right to not have to work in that environment, as long as he does it "after hours." So who exactly are "the dancers
FactsAreFacts said: "Has anyone seen this yet? I'd love to hear what you thought, and more importantly (at least for logistical purposes) what the run-time is."
The confirmation email says 1hr 45, no intermission. I'd swear that two different ushers on my way in said two different runtimes, one saying 1hr 50, one saying 2 hours. Anyway, it was somewhere in this area; no intermission.
If only the union had gone to bat for the women who were violated. Where does this fall in revenge porn laws?"
The union feels that the right of a harassing dancer to remain employed supersedes the right of a woman to not be harassed while employed. And apparently spreading nude photos of your colleagues is a 'non-criminal personal life activity.'
As a ticket buyer I appreciate knowing this, so I know how to spend m
Nice to know that the dancers' union thinks that trading nude photos of your colleagues without their consent is a 'non-criminal activity in your private life,' and a victim of such harassment should be forced to keep working
"
