So is the WSS Instagram account going to just leave their comments turned off forever, so that no one can comment about their casting on any of their posts? Feels like a&
yankeefan7 said: " I would love to see some show say nobody is doing the stage door and see the reaction."
I'm too lazy to Google it right now, but isn't this what happened with that play that Amy Schumer did, that some (all?) of the actors announced on social media before it even started that they would not be doing the stage door for the entire run of the play?
I didn't read that he was expecting (or that he got) the show to reimburse him for traveling to Philly to get his haircut? Just that he finally got the ok to not have to use the show's hair person, after two failed show hair people, and was allowed to do it with his own person when he was in Philly.
Mediamaven2 said: " It's not like the dancers uncomfortable with this haven't been heard or have any reason to fear repercussions. "
The women dancers here have been told here by their union that their union will fight for Ramasar's right to decimate nude photos of them without their consent, etc., versus their right to not have to work in that environment, as long as he does it "after hours." So who exactly are "the dancers
FactsAreFacts said: "Has anyone seen this yet? I'd love to hear what you thought, and more importantly (at least for logistical purposes) what the run-time is."
The confirmation email says 1hr 45, no intermission. I'd swear that two different ushers on my way in said two different runtimes, one saying 1hr 50, one saying 2 hours. Anyway, it was somewhere in this area; no intermission.
If only the union had gone to bat for the women who were violated. Where does this fall in revenge porn laws?"
The union feels that the right of a harassing dancer to remain employed supersedes the right of a woman to not be harassed while employed. And apparently spreading nude photos of your colleagues is a 'non-criminal personal life activity.'
As a ticket buyer I appreciate knowing this, so I know how to spend m
Nice to know that the dancers' union thinks that trading nude photos of your colleagues without their consent is a 'non-criminal activity in your private life,' and a victim of such harassment should be forced to keep working
zainmax said: "While being kind and courteous, I'm curious to know which Broadway performers are odd or have weird views in person. Ex: I've heard that Christine Ebersole is a 9/11 truther and conspiracy theorist."
Why the "I've heard" disclaimer, hasn't she done (and been quoted in) interviews talking about this?
My girlfriend said that she could see that the show itself is great, but did not at all enjoy the performance. I would love if we could either get a refund or get tickets for another evening. My coworker (who is in the industry) suggested I call the Shubert organization and post here, though he said my only "legit" complaints were the latter two. Is there anything else you folks suggest doing?
I don't know if there's a better thread here to post this on, but I was just (Thursday 1/3) walking by the theatre and they now have this sign up about rush.
There is no rush, and standing room is $79.50 each, for the rest of the run.
Audience participation mad libs is (or was, on Saturday) in Act II. It wasn't true audience participation, though, as the storyline was that they chose the person during intermission.
No offense, but, full offense: if you are "not a tech expert" and "don't 100% know how it works" and you "don't completely know if/how the Facebook information will be publicly displayed, or not" and you "don't know if this is where we end up long term or not" and "this is certainly not my area of expertise," etc etc etc, then why are you the moderator who is explaining this?
"
_/
