BWW, we need to talk.

Valentina3 Profile Photo
Valentina3
#1BWW, we need to talk.
Posted: 7/5/17 at 10:44am

I don't know the kind of editorial scrutiny BWW articles get, but I cringe everytime I read titles like "<so and so> reveals <this>". Revelations apply to things which are meant to be a secret, and not about things which no one had simply asked about before. Case in point - VIDEO: Julie Andrews Reveals Secrets of Iconic SOUND OF MUSIC Scene. I mean cm'mon.

This happens on TMZ-like articles as well, but I don't expect any standards from them. I might be expecting too much, but this is kinda ridiculous.


Caption: Every so often there was a rare moment of perfect balance when I soared above him.

Miss American Profile Photo
Miss American
#2BWW, we need to talk.
Posted: 7/5/17 at 11:12am

I think that the computer program that generates the articles was only programmed with a limited vocabulary. 

haterobics Profile Photo
haterobics
#3BWW, we need to talk.
Posted: 7/5/17 at 11:16am

Miss American said: "I think that the computer program that generates the articles was only programmed with a limited vocabulary. "

One that thinks tributes is a verb.

LizzieCurry Profile Photo
LizzieCurry
#4BWW, we need to talk.
Posted: 7/5/17 at 11:53am

Playbill headlines aren't much better.


"This thread reads like a series of White House memos." — Mister Matt

Valentina3 Profile Photo
Valentina3
#5BWW, we need to talk.
Posted: 7/5/17 at 1:07pm

VIDEO: Sutton Foster Reveals Her Most Challenging Broadway Role

 

smh


Caption: Every so often there was a rare moment of perfect balance when I soared above him.

DottieD'Luscia Profile Photo
DottieD'Luscia
#6BWW, we need to talk.
Posted: 7/5/17 at 1:28pm

Lately I just roll my eyes when I see those headlines.  They don't entice me to open the link either.


Hey Dottie! Did your colleagues enjoy the cake even though your cat decided to sit on it? ~GuyfromGermany

UncleCharlie
#7BWW, we need to talk.
Posted: 7/5/17 at 1:50pm

It's PEOPLE magazine for theater fans. We're not dealing with the New York Times here, folks.

10086Sundays
#8BWW, we need to talk.
Posted: 7/5/17 at 2:47pm

I'm far more irritated by the quote feature.  

Why does it add all that extra blank space at the bottom?  Especially since some people don't seem to realize it so their post ends up in italics so it's hard to tell where the quote ends and the new post starts.

Updated On: 7/5/17 at 02:47 PM

javero Profile Photo
javero
#9BWW, we need to talk.
Posted: 7/7/17 at 7:11pm

"I'm far more irritated by the quote feature."

This has easily become my favorite threaddevil


#FactsMatter...your feelings not so much.

Plannietink08 Profile Photo
Plannietink08
#10BWW, we need to talk.
Posted: 7/11/17 at 10:22am

I've seen the article "TIM RICE RESPONDS TO JOSEPH LYRIC CHANGE" appear three times on the site's main page and one as "ANDREW LLOYD WEBBER RESPONDS TO JOSEPH LYRIC CHANGE" despite them not quoting ALW at all!


"Charlotte, we're Jewish"

BroadwayConcierge Profile Photo
BroadwayConcierge
#11BWW, we need to talk.
Posted: 7/14/17 at 7:23pm

My two latest peeves:

1) https://www.broadwayworld.com/article/Breaking-Jackie-Burns-Will-Make-Long-Awaited-Return-to-WICKED-This-Summer-Amanda-Jane-Cooper-More-Also-Join-Cast-20170712

"Long-awaited"... really? I'm a big Burns fan myself, but was there really a crowd of people "awaiting" her return to the show?

2) https://www.broadwayworld.com/article/Is-Casting-a-Role-Correctly-an-Issue-for-Both-Broadway-and-Hollywood-20170714

Listen, I know this is BroadwayWorld, not the Wall Street Journal, but this article must have the worst lede I've ever read. Not only does it directly contradict the headline, but it reveals tons of authorial bias. 

Do better, BWW.