Click below to access all the grosses from all the shows for the week ending 1/15/2017 in BroadwayWorld.com's grosses section.
Also, you will find information on each show's historical grosses, cumulative grosses and other statistics on how each show stacked up this week and in the past.
How profitable are shows like Chicago and Phantom now? They recoup long ago, I'm just curious if they will ever fathom closing. Would it take In Transit attendance numbers?
The overall lack of shows over the next few weeks might help struggling shows like IN TRANSIT, JITNEY & ON YOUR FEET. We've gone from having 33 shows to now 22(OH, HELLO closes Sunday). No new shows arrive until February with SUNSET(Feb. 2), SUNDAY...PARK(Feb. 11) & THE GLASS MENAGERIE(Feb. 7) the next shows starting previews.
A Chorus Line revival played its final Broadway performance on August 17, 2008. The tour played its final performance on August 21, 2011. A new non-equity tour started in October 2012 played its final performance on March 23, 2013. Another non-equity tour launched on January 20, 2018. The tour ended its US run in Kansas City and then toured throughout Japan August & September 2018.
This New York Times article from 2012 says that Phantom's weekly nut was around $600,000. I can't imagine it has gone up too much since then. What worried me about Phantom closing was the Harry Potter show. I thought if those producers said they wanted the Majestic, that they would get it. Thankfully that's not the case. As for Chicago, as long as the Weisslers are still actively involved in producing it, it won't close.
I never saw anyone from the Harry Potter team say they wanted the Majestic. Whatever the next tenant is after Phantom, if there ever is one, that theater would have to be gutted anyway.
"As for Chicago, as long as the Weisslers are still actively involved in producing it, it won't close. "
If the show consistently loses money for a period of time, they will absolutely not keep it open notwithstanding how active they are. To this point they have cobbled out enough revenue to make it viable, but that could change, almost on a dime.
Do these grosses include performances from last night?
In our millions, in our billions, we are most powerful when we stand together. TW4C unwaveringly joins the worldwide masses, for we know our liberation is inseparably bound.
Signed,
Theater Workers for a Ceasefire
https://theaterworkersforaceasefire.com/statement
I'm so curious about financials. I'm surprised it took "Oh Hello" that long to recoup? It's been pulling in great numbers its whole run. It's only 2 actors - who are presumably working for fairly cheap - no big costume pieces, no need for a big crew, etc. No understudies. Why would it cost so much?
RippedMan said: "I'm so curious about financials. I'm surprised it took "Oh Hello" that long to recoup? It's been pulling in great numbers its whole run. It's only 2 actors - who are presumably working for fairly cheap - no big costume pieces, no need for a big crew, etc. No understudies. Why would it cost so much?
It is THEIR show. I'd think they'd come cheap. They also wrote it, so they are getting paid that way as well. But I can't imagine they're breaking the bank. Neither one of them are "bankable" stars in the vein of Blanchett.
I also doubt that Kroll and Mullaney are working for cheap; neither is what anyone would call wealthy, with limited television success up to now.
And although they wrote the show, it technically belongs to Patrick Catullo, Marcia Goldberg, Barbara Whitman, Marc Platt, Pierce Cravens, James G. Kernochan, Jonathan Reinis, Benjamin Simpson & Joseph Longthorne/Shira Friedman, Triptyk Studios, Bellanca Smigel Rutter, Nathan Vernon, Mike LaVoie and Comedy Central, the producers.
They're getting star salaries. And even if their weekly nut is only ~/300k on a sliding scale, it still takes a little bit of time to recoup the $2.9m if youre only grossing 500k/600k a week
RippedMan said: "It is THEIR show. I'd think they'd come cheap. They also wrote it, so they are getting paid that way as well. But I can't imagine they're breaking the bank. Neither one of them are "bankable" stars in the vein of Blanchett.
"
Doesn't matter if it's THEIR show. The show still has a team of producers, and in the world of comedy... yeah, they're pretty big names. Obviously they're no Blanchett, but I'm going to safely assume they were making a decent salary per week.
Many shows do not recoup. Impressive that this show did. No matter how long it took.
GreenGables said: "They're getting star salaries. And even if their weekly nut is only ~/300k on a sliding scale, it still takes a little bit of time to recoup the $2.9m if youre only grossing 500k/600k a week"
Some followups to this:
1. Based on those numbers the net gross minus the nut is roughly $3.3mil.
2. An announcement of recoupment is not something that is automatic or required, so under the best of circumstances (as with all financial announcements) there is some lead time. It is not (nor could it be) announced in real time.
3. Based on these numbers, it most likely would not have recouped before the last week.
4. There will likely be some additional funds flowing to the producers and investors post hoc when deposits, bonds and excess reserves are returned.